| Literature DB >> 27625085 |
Qing-Qing He1, Jian Zhu1, Da-Yong Zhuang1, Zi-Yi Fan1, Lu-Ming Zheng1, Peng Zhou1, Lei Hou1, Fang Yu1, Yan-Ning Li1, Lei Xiao1, Xue-Feng Dong1, Gao-Feng Ni1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A large proportion of the patients with papillary thyroid microcarcinoma are young women. Therefore, minimally invasive endoscopic thyroidectomy with central neck dissection (CND) emerged and showed well-accepted results with improved cosmetic outcome, accelerated healing, and comforting the patients. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of robotic total thyroidectomy with CND via bilateral axillo-breast approach (BABA), compared with conventional open procedure in papillary thyroid microcarcinoma.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27625085 PMCID: PMC5022334 DOI: 10.4103/0366-6999.189911
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chin Med J (Engl) ISSN: 0366-6999 Impact factor: 2.628
Figure 1Drawing instrument arm trajectory lines and working area.
Figure 2Each of the four trocars was docked with a robotic arm.
Figure 3Identifying and protecting parathyroid glands and the recurrent laryngeal nerve.
Figure 4Robotic total thyroidectomy with central neck dissection showing the course of the ipsilateral (right) recurrent laryngeal nerve and the superior parathyroid gland.
Figure 5Identifying and exposing recurrent laryngeal nerve, the negative development of parathyroid glands by Carbon Nanoparticles.
Clinical data and postoperative outcomes between robotic and conventional open approach groups
| Items | Robotic group ( | Conventional open approach group ( | Statistical values | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 40.9 ± 9.8 | 41.5 ± 11.7 | 0.278* | >0.05 |
| Male/female, | 9/41 | 8/42 | 0.071† | >0.05 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.9 ± 3.5 | 23.8 ± 3.1 | 1.664* | >0.05 |
| Primary tumor size (mm) | 5.07 ± 3.3 | 4.96 ± 3.1 | 0.172* | >0.05 |
| Multicentricity/multifocality, | 7 | 8 | 0.078† | >0.05 |
| Type of surgery, | ||||
| Total thyroidectomy with CND | 44 | 43 | 0.088† | >0.05 |
| Total thyroidectomy with bilateral CND | 6 | 7 | 0.120† | >0.05 |
| Parathyroid gland autotransplantation, | 10 | 16 | 1.871† | >0.05 |
| Total number of removed lymph nodes | 6.7 ± 2.0 | 6.8 ± 2.1 | 0.268* | >0.05 |
| Central lymph node metastasis, | 19 | 16 | 0.396† | >0.05 |
| Operating time (min) | 118.8 ± 16.5 | 90.7 ± 10.3 | 10.215* | <0.05 |
| Estimated blood loss (ml) | <20 | <20 | ||
| Postoperative hospital stay (days) | 5.1 ± 1.4 | 5.3 ± 1.6 | 0.665* | >0.05 |
| VAS scores (24 h) | 2.1 ± 1.0 | 3.8 ± 1.2 | 7.696* | <0.05 |
| NSS scores | 8.9 ± 0.8 | 4.8 ± 1.7 | 15.108* | <0.05 |
| Total drain volume (ml) | 189.9 ± 48.3 | 195.7 ± 50.4 | 0.588* | >0.05 |
| Mean drain days (days) | 4.4 ± 2.4 | 5.1 ± 3.7 | 1.122* | >0.05 |
| Postoperative complications, | 2.486† | >0.05 | ||
| Postoperative bleeding | 0 | 0 | ||
| Subcutaneous emphysema | 0 | 0 | ||
| Pneumomediastinum | 0 | 0 | ||
| Temporary hypoparathyroidism | 10 | 17 | ||
| RLN paralysis (temporary) | 1 | 0 | ||
| Seroma | 1 | 0 | ||
| Skin burn | 0 | 0 | ||
| Flap necrosis | 0 | 0 | ||
| Hematoma | 0 | 0 | ||
| Wound infection | 0 | 0 | ||
| Chyle leakage | 0 | 0 | ||
| Postoperative Tg level (ng/ml) | 1.0 ± 0.2 | 0.9 ± 0.2 | 1.000* | >0.05 |
| Postoperative cosmetic result, | 92.165† | <0.05 | ||
| Not at all | 0 | 0 | ||
| Normal | 0 | 3 | ||
| Fairly | 1 | 46 | ||
| Extremely | 49 | 1 |
The data were shown as mean ± standard deviation unless otherwise indicated. *t value; †Chi-square value. BMI: Body mass index; CND: Central neck dissection; RLN: Recurrent laryngeal nerve; VAS: Visual analog scale; NSS: Numerical score system; Tg: Thyroglobulin.
Figure 6Scar cosmesis 1 month after robotic total thyroidectomy with central neck dissection, which could be covered by bra.