R M Neagoe1, I T Cvasciuc2, M Muresan3, D T Sala4. 1. University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Second Department of Surgery, Targu Mures, Romania. 2. Leeds Teaching Hospitals, Dept. of Endocrine Surgery, Leeds, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. 3. University of Medicine and Pharmacy, General Surgery, Targu Mures, Romania. 4. Emergency Mures County Hospital, Second Department of Surgery, Targu Mures, Romania.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Postoperative hypocalcemia after thyroid surgery has a high prevalence ( 16-55% in different series). Incidental parathyroidectomy (IP) is a less discussed complication of thyroidectomy with consequences not properly defined. The aim of our study was to find incidence, risk factors and how to prevent IP. METHODS: Extensive search of English literature publications via PubMed was performed and 73 papers from 1980 to 2017 were analysed using the GRADE system/classification, quality of evidence was classified as "strong" when the result is highly unlikely to change existing recommendation and "weak" when opposite. RESULTS: Incidence of IP is 3.7-24.9%, while prevalence of permanent hypoparathyroidism is less frequent 6-12%. Direct relation between IP and hypoparathyroidism/hypocalcemia remains controversial. Female patients, ectopic parathyroids, small thyroids, Graves', malignancy, redo surgeries and total thyroidectomy favour IP. Routine visualization of parathyroids, new hemostatic devices, magnifying instruments and fluorescence can prevent incidental removal of parathyroids. Incidence of IP during videoassisted or robotic thyroidectomies was similar to open procedures. High volume, experienced and younger surgeons have lower complication rates (including hypoparathyroidism). CONCLUSIONS: Incidental parathyroidectomy is more frequent than we might have expected. It should be avoided and parathyroid glands should be kept in situ. Majority of studies are retrospective (low degree of evidence according to previous mentioned GRADE classification) and further meta-analysis or randomized control studies are welcome in order to define the impact of incidental removal of parathyroids on postoperative outcome.
BACKGROUND: Postoperative hypocalcemia after thyroid surgery has a high prevalence ( 16-55% in different series). Incidental parathyroidectomy (IP) is a less discussed complication of thyroidectomy with consequences not properly defined. The aim of our study was to find incidence, risk factors and how to prevent IP. METHODS: Extensive search of English literature publications via PubMed was performed and 73 papers from 1980 to 2017 were analysed using the GRADE system/classification, quality of evidence was classified as "strong" when the result is highly unlikely to change existing recommendation and "weak" when opposite. RESULTS: Incidence of IP is 3.7-24.9%, while prevalence of permanent hypoparathyroidism is less frequent 6-12%. Direct relation between IP and hypoparathyroidism/hypocalcemia remains controversial. Female patients, ectopic parathyroids, small thyroids, Graves', malignancy, redo surgeries and total thyroidectomy favour IP. Routine visualization of parathyroids, new hemostatic devices, magnifying instruments and fluorescence can prevent incidental removal of parathyroids. Incidence of IP during videoassisted or robotic thyroidectomies was similar to open procedures. High volume, experienced and younger surgeons have lower complication rates (including hypoparathyroidism). CONCLUSIONS: Incidental parathyroidectomy is more frequent than we might have expected. It should be avoided and parathyroid glands should be kept in situ. Majority of studies are retrospective (low degree of evidence according to previous mentioned GRADE classification) and further meta-analysis or randomized control studies are welcome in order to define the impact of incidental removal of parathyroids on postoperative outcome.
Authors: Oliver Thomusch; Andreas Machens; Carsten Sekulla; Jörg Ukkat; Michael Brauckhoff; Henning Dralle Journal: Surgery Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Mario Testini; Michele Nacchiero; Giuseppe Piccinni; Piero Portincasa; Beatrice Di Venere; Germana Lissidini; G Martino Bonomo Journal: Microsurgery Date: 2004 Impact factor: 2.425
Authors: Kevin M Higgins; David L Mandell; Satish Govindaraj; Eric M Genden; Jeffrey I Mechanick; Donald A Bergman; Edward J Diamond; Mark L Urken Journal: Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2004-01
Authors: E Spaziani; A R Di Filippo; C Di Cristofano; G Caruso; M Spaziani; S Orelli; F Fiorini; M Picchio; A De Cesare Journal: Acta Endocrinol (Buchar) Date: 2021 Apr-Jun Impact factor: 0.877
Authors: D T Sala; M Muresan; S Voidazan; T Cvasciuc; R Darie; V Danielopol; S Muresan; I Pascanu Journal: Acta Endocrinol (Buchar) Date: 2019 Apr-Jun Impact factor: 0.877