| Literature DB >> 27624874 |
Caren E Smith1, Oscar Coltell2,3, Jose V Sorlí3,4, Ramón Estruch3,5, Miguel Ángel Martínez-González3,6, Jordi Salas-Salvadó3,7, Montserrat Fitó3,8, Fernando Arós3,9, Hassan S Dashti1, Chao Q Lai1, Leticia Miró3,10, Lluís Serra-Majem3,11, Enrique Gómez-Gracia12, Miquel Fiol3,13, Emilio Ros3,14, Stella Aslibekyan15, Bertha Hidalgo15, Marian L Neuhouser16, Chongzhi Di16, Katherine L Tucker17, Donna K Arnett15, José M Ordovás1,18,19, Dolores Corella3,4.
Abstract
Controversy persists on the association between dairy products, especially milk, and cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Genetic proxies may improve dairy intake estimations, and clarify diet-disease relationships through Mendelian randomization. We meta-analytically (n ≤ 20,089) evaluated associations between a lactase persistence (LP) SNP, the minichromosome maintenance complex component 6 (MCM6)-rs3754686C>T (nonpersistence>persistence), dairy intake, and CVD biomarkers in American (Hispanics, African-American and Whites) and Mediterranean populations. Moreover, we analyzed longitudinal associations with milk, CVD and mortality in PREDIMED), a randomized Mediterranean diet (MedDiet) intervention trial (n = 7185). The MCM6-rs3754686/MCM6-rs309180 (as proxy), LP-allele (T) was strongly associated with higher milk intake, but inconsistently associated with glucose and lipids, and not associated with CVD or total mortality in the whole population. Heterogeneity analyses suggested some sex-specific associations. The T-allele was associated with higher CVD and mortality risk in women but not in men (P-sex interaction:0.005 and 0.032, respectively), mainly in the MedDiet group. However, milk intake was not associated with CVD biomarkers, CVD or mortality either generally or in sub-groups. Although MCM6-rs3754686 is a good milk intake proxy in these populations, attributing its associations with CVD and mortality in Mediterranean women to milk is unwarranted, as other factors limiting the assumption of causality in Mendelian randomization may exist.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27624874 PMCID: PMC5021998 DOI: 10.1038/srep33188
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Population Characteristics, stratified by sex or race*.
| Boston Puerto Rican Health Study (BPRHS) | P1 | Genetics of Lipid Lowering Drugs and Diet Network (GOLDN) | P1 | Prevención con Dieta Mediterránea (PREDIMED) | P1 | Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) | P1 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Men (n = 371) | Women (n = 873) | Men (n = 404) | Women (n = 413) | Men (n = 3065) | Women (n = 4120) | African American Women (n = 7498) | Hispanic American Women (n = 3345) | |||||
| Age, yrs | 56.7 ± 8.0 | 57.4 ± 7.7 | 0.164 | 49 ± 16 | 49 ± 16 | 0.363 | 66.0 ± 6.5 | 67.7 ± 5.8 | < 0.001 | 61.1 ± 6.8 | 60.0 ± 6.6 | <0.001 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 29.7 ± 5.1 | 32.7 ± 7.0 | <0.001 | 28.6 ± 4.7 | 28.4 ± 6.2 | 0.180 | 29.3 ± 3.3 | 30.4 ± 4.1 | <0.001 | 30.9 ± 6.3 | 28.8 ± 5.5 | <0.001 |
| Plasma glucose, mg/dL | 122 ± 54 | 121 ± 54 | 0.617 | 106 ± 22 | 99 ± 16 | 0.000 | 124 ± 41 | 117 ± 41 | <0.001 | 108 ± 36 | 103 ± 29 | 0.006 |
| Total cholesterol, mg/dL | 174 ± 43 | 190 ± 39 | <0.001 | 190 ± 39 | 194 ± 43 | 0.236 | 201 ± 39 | 217 ± 39 | <0.001 | 221 ± 43 | 221 ± 39 | 0.932 |
| LDL-C, mg/dL | 101 ± 35 | 112 ± 35 | <0.001 | 124 ± 31 | 124 ± 35 | 0.093 | 128 ± 35 | 132 ± 35 | <0.001 | 139 ± 39 | 132 ± 35 | 0.018 |
| HDL-C, mg/dL | 38.7 ± 11.6 | 46.4 ± 11.6 | <0.001 | 42.6 ± 7.7 | 50.3 ± 15.5 | <0.001 | 50.3 ± 11.6 | 58.1 ± 15.5 | <0.001 | 58.1 ± 15.5 | 54.2 ± 15.5 | <0.001 |
| Triglycerides, mg/dL | 177 ± 142 | 159 ± 106 | 0.115 | 151 ± 115 | 124 ± 80 | <0.001 | 142 ± 89 | 133 ± 71 | 0.011 | 124 ± 62 | 159 ± 71 | <0.001 |
| Total energy, kcal/day | 2687 ± 1321 | 2093 ± 1068 | <0.001 | 2500 ± 1500 | 1780 ± 817 | <0.001 | 2446 ± 623 | 2150 ± 560 | <0.001 | 1598 ± 914 | 1660 ± 957 | 0.010 |
| Total fat intake, %energy | 32.2 ± 5.3 | 30.8 ± 5.1 | <0.001 | 35.8 ± 6.7 | 35.1 ± 6.9 | 0.010 | 38.79 ± 6.8 | 39.59 ± 6.8 | <0.001 | 34.8 ± 8.2 | 33.7 ± 8.2 | <0.001 |
| Saturated fat intake, %energy | 9.8 ± 2.4 | 9.3 ± 2.2 | 1.3 × 10−3 | 12.1 ± 2.7 | 11.5 ± 2.6 | <0.001 | 9.9 ± 2.2 | 10.0 ± 2.2 | 0.135 | 11.0 ± 3.1 | 10.9 ± 3.1 | 0.264 |
| Carbohydrate intake, %energy | 50.0 ± 7.4 | 52.4 ± 7.5 | <0.001 | 47.5 ± 8.6 | 50.3 ± 8.1 | <0.001 | 41.1 ± 7.4 | 42.5 ± 6.9 | <0.001 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Total dairy intake, g/day | 413 ± 320 | 403 ± 304 | 0.562 | 413 ± 445 | 352 ± 315 | 0.002 | 345 ± 211 | 412 ± 227 | <0.001 | 136 ± 204 | 195 ± 241 | <0.001 |
| (0.754) | (0.006) | (<0.001) | (<0.001) | |||||||||
| Milk intake, g/day | 355 ± 301 | 340 ± 273 | 0.306 | 368 ± 427 | 305 ± 306 | 0.001 | 236 ± 182 | 278 ± 3 | <0.001 | 103 ± 187 | 155 ± 223 | <0.001 |
| (0.629) | (0.001) | (<0.001) | (<0.001) | |||||||||
| Yogurt intake, g/day | 22.2 ± 53.2 | 40.2 ± 69.6 | <0.001 | 15.4 ± 33.0 | 28.1 ± 40.4 | <0.001 | 66.6 ± 80.2 | 93.1 ± 92.5 | <0.001 | 27.3 ± 61.6 | 33.4 ± 66.9 | <0.001 |
| (<0.001) | (<0.001) | (<0.001) | (<0.001) | |||||||||
| Cheese intake, g/day | 35.3 ± 39.2 | 23.6 ± 24.7 | <0.001 | 29.8 ± 28.3 | 18.9 ± 15.8 | <0.001 | 29.1 ± 26.3 | 30.5 ± 26.6 | 0.030 | 4.8 ± 8.0 | 6.5 ± 11.9 | <0.001 |
| (<0.001) | (<0.001) | (0.010) | (<0.001) | |||||||||
| Diabetes,% | 39.5 | 39.5 | 0.849 | 6.0 | 8.7 | 0.225 | 53.7 | 44.4 | <0.001 | 11.9 | 7.4 | <0.001 |
| Current smoker,% | 34.1 | 20.8 | <0.001 | 8.2 | 8.2 | 0.911 | 25.2 | 5.7 | <0.001 | 4.3 | 2.0 | <0.001 |
| Current drinker,% | 49.9 | 35.6 | <0.001 | 48.8 | 50.4 | 0.676 | 83.6 | 48.1 | <0.001 | 20.7 | 18.2 | 0.003 |
| MCM6-rs3754686 Genotype (%)** | ||||||||||||
| CC (LNP) | 37.2 | 36.1 | 0.716 | 6.7 | 7.0 | 0.972 | 23.6 | 22.6 | 0.618 | 56.3 | 31.8 | <0.001 |
| CT(LP Heterozygote ) | 45.6 | 45.7 | 40.6 | 41.0 | 49.1 | 49.6 | 36.2 | 49.5 | ||||
| TT(LP Homozygote ) | 17.2 | 18.2 | 52.7 | 52.0 | 27.3 | 27.8 | 7.6 | 18.7 | ||||
*Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation for continuous variables or as % for categorical variables.
**The rs3754686 SNP was determined in the PREDIMED Study and imputed in the BPRHS. The proxy SNP rs309180 was used in GOLDN and WHI studies.
1P-values for differences in sex and differences in race. Chi-squared tests were used to test differences in percentages. We used t-test to compare means of continuous variables. The P-values without parentheses refer to the untransformed continuous variables (except for log-transformed Triglycerides), whereas values in parentheses refer to square-root transformed variables for dairy products.
LNP Lactase Non-persistence; LPHeterozygote: Lactase Persistence as heterozygote genotype; LPHomozygote: Lactase Persistence as homozygote genotype.
***Some variables (biomarkers and dietary intake) included missing data points.
Figure 1Flow-chart in BPRHS, GOLDN, PREDIMED and WHI studies.
We meta-analyzed four populations including n = 20,031 subjects for the associations between the MCM6- rs3754686 polymorphism and dairy intake. N = 10,223 for the associations with CVD biomarkers, and n = 7,185 for the associations between the proxy for milk intake and incidence of CVD and total mortality.
Associations of MCM6-rs3754686 with dairy and nutrient intake*.
| BPRHS | P | GOLDN | P | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whole population | Whole population | |||||||
| CC (490) | CT (558) | TT (196) | CC (56) | CT (333) | TT (428) | |||
| Total dairy, | 372 ± 14 | 426 ± 13 | 407 ± 21 | 0.030 | 246 ± 28 | 358 ± 20 | 377 ± 16 | 4.2 × 10−3 |
| g/day | (0.031) | 0.0028 | 2.80E-03 | (2.8 × 10−3) | ||||
| Milk intake, | 315 ± 12 | 366 ± 12 | 342 ± 20 | 0.025 | 199 ± 26 | 316 ± 19 | 331 ± 15 | 2.2 × 10−3 |
| g/day | (0.037) | 0.0011 | 1.10E-03 | (1.1 × 10−3) | ||||
| Yogurt intake, | 32.8 ± 3.0 | 35.0 ± 2.8 | 36.3 ± 4.6 | 0.747 | 23.2 ± 5.8 | 18.7 ± 1.6 | 22.6 ± 1.9 | 0.494 |
| g/day | (0.663) | (0.515) | ||||||
| Cheese intake, | 23.8 ± 1.2 | 24.6 ± 1.1 | 28.4 ± 1.8 | 0.071 | 24.9 ± 2.8 | 22.7 ± 1.1 | 22.5 ± 1.0 | 0.268 |
| g/day | (0.142) | (0.165) | ||||||
| Calcium, mg/day | 1043 ± 27 | 1092 ± 25 | 1078 ± 42 | 0.337 | 828 ± 57 | 934 ± 29 | 942 ± 27 | 0.218 |
| Total energy intake, kcal/day | 2099 ± 40 | 2112 ± 38 | 2191 ± 63 | 0.177 | 2073 ± 106 | 2077 ± 46 | 2003 ± 49 | 0.210 |
| Total fat, %energy | 31.3 ± 0.2 | 31.1 ± 0.2 | 31.1 ± 0.4 | 0.980 | 37.1 ± 1.1 | 35.3 ± 0.4 | 35.5 ± 0.4 | 0.225 |
| Saturated fat, %energy | 9.3 ± 0.1 | 9.5 ± 0.1 | 9.6 ± 0.2 | 0.210 | 11.9 ± 0.4 | 11.8 ± 0.2 | 11.8 ± 0.1 | 0.866 |
| PREDIMED | WHI | |||||||
| Whole population | Whole population | |||||||
| CC (1642) | CT (3518) | TT (1967) | P | CC (5282) | CT (4368) | TT (1193) | P | |
| Total dairy, | 359 ± 5 | 386 ± 3 | 399 ± 5 | 1.3 × 10−6 | 127 ± 3 | 177 ± 3 | 211 ± 6 | 1.2 × 10−46 |
| g/day | (1.9 × 10−6) | 3.4E-66 | 3.4E-66 | (3.4 × 10−66) | ||||
| Milk intake, | 241 ± 4 | 261 ± 3 | 272 ± 4 | 9.8 × 10−6 | 94.5 ± 2.8 | 141.2 ± 3.1 | 169.3 ± 5.8 | 2.3 × 10−44 |
| g/day | (4.0 × 10−6) | 1.22E-65 | 1.2E-65 | (1.2 × 10−65) | ||||
| Yogurt intake, | 77.0 ± 2.1 | 82.6 ± 1.5 | 84.5 ± 2.1 | 0.131 | 27.5 ± 0.9 | 30.3 ± 1.0 | 36.1 ± 1.8 | 0.078 |
| g/day | (0.171) | 0.001859 | 1.9E-03 | (1.9 × 10−3) | ||||
| Cheese intake, | 29.7 ± 0.6 | 29.9 ± 0.5 | 30.1 ± 0.6 | 0.206 | 5.0 ± 0.1 | 5.7 ± 0.1 | 5.7 ± 0.3 | 3.8 × 10−3 |
| g/day | (0.266) | 2.86E-08 | 2.9E-08 | (2.9 × 10−8) | ||||
| Calcium, mg/day | 1019 ± 8 | 1046 ± 6 | 1065 ± 8 | 3.3 × 10−5 | N/A | |||
| Total energy intake, kcal/day | 2253 ± 14 | 2276 ± 10 | 2296 ± 14 | 0.009 | 1611 ± 11 | 1651 ± 12 | 1662 ± 23 | 0.057 |
| Total fat, %energy | 39.5 ± 0.2 | 39.2 ± 0.1 | 38.8 ± 0.2 | 0.298 | 34.7 ± 0.1 | 34.6 ± 0.1 | 33.9 ± 0.2 | 0.158 |
| Saturated fat, %energy | 10.0 ± 0.1 | 10.0 ± 0.0 | 9.9 ± 0.1 | 0.661 | 10.9 ± 0.0 | 11.1 ± 0.0 | 11.0 ± 0.1 | 0.010 |
*Values are means ± Standard Error of Mean. P-values adjusted for sex, age, field center or ancestry (BPRHS, WHI), family (GOLDN), BMI, smoking, drinking, physical activity, diabetes, medication and total energy intake. The rs3754686 SNP was determined in the PREDIMED Study and imputed in the BPRHS. The proxy SNP rs309180 was used in GOLDN and WHI studies.
**General Linear Regression models with multivariable adjustment for the indicated covariates were fitted for each population.
***Variables for dairy were used untransformed as well as square-root transformed to improve normality. The P-values without parentheses refer to the untransformed continuous variables, whereas values in parentheses refer to square-root transformed variables for dairy products.
Figure 2Meta-analysis of the association between the MCM6-rs3754686 polymorphism and total milk intake according to sex in BPRHS, GOLDN, PREDIMED and WHI studies.
Forest plots: (A) total milk in men, and (B) total milk in women, show adjusted regression coefficients and 95% CI (expressed in g/d and estimated per one copy of the T-allele; LCT genotypes coded as 0, 1 and 2 according to the number of T-alleles) for the corresponding intake in each study. The diamond shows the meta-analyzed associations in a fixed-effects model. The I2 statistic was calculated for heterogeneity. Pmeta-analysis indicates the P-value obtained in the meta-analysis including all populations. P’meta-analysis indicates the P-value for the meta-analysis obtained in the sensitivity analysis excluding the WHI AA women. In both cases, results for raw data and square-root transformed data (values in parentheses) for milk are presented. P and P’ for sex differences indicate the P-values for heterogeneity by sex in the total (P) and the sensitivity (P’) meta-analysis.
Figure 3Longitudinal effect of the MCM6-rs3754686 polymorphism on total milk intake over a 5-y follow-up period in the PREDIMED study in men and women combined.
Adjusted means of milk intake are expressed in g/d yearly depending on the genotype in all subjects having data for all the measurements (n = 2087). Error bars indicate the standard error of means. P-values for the overall effect of the polymorphism as well as the P-values for the interaction term between the MCM6 SNP and sex, were estimated from a repeated-measures ANOVA model adjusted for sex, age, field center, diabetes, smoking, drinking, and total energy intake. The P-values without parentheses refer to the untransformed continuous variables, whereas values in parentheses refer to square-root transformed variables for milk.
Associations of MCM6-rs3754686 proxy for milk intake with fasting glucose and lipids*.
| BPRHS | GOLDN | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CC (485) | CT (553) | TT (194) | P1 | P2 | CC (56) | CT (333) | TT (428) | P1 | P2 | |
| Glucose, mg/dL | 127 ± 3 | 120 ± 2 | 115 ± 4 | 0.036 | 0.032 | 103 ± 2 | 103 ± 1 | 101 ± 1 | 0.479 | 0.091 |
| Total cholesterol, mg/dL | 181 ± 2 | 181 ± 2 | 179 ± 3 | 0.914 | 0.968 | 197 ± 5 | 195 ± 2 | 191 ± 2 | 0.225 | 0.216 |
| LDL-C, mg/dL | 105 ± 2 | 105 ± 2 | 105 ± 3 | 0.981 | 0.939 | 127 ± 4 | 125 ± 2 | 123 ± 2 | 0.518 | 0.470 |
| HDL-C, mg/dL | 43.8 ± 0.6 | 44.3 ± 0.5 | 41.7 ± 0.9 | 0.038 | 0.041 | 46.9 ± 1.7 | 46.0 ± 0.7 | 45.9 ± 0.7 | 0.855 | 0.827 |
| Triglycerides, mg/dL | 168 ± 6 | 163 ± 5 | 169 ± 9 | 0.637 | 0.859 | 144 ± 11 | 142 ± 6 | 142 ± 5 | 0.894 | 0.827 |
| PREDIMED | WHI | |||||||||
| CC (1594) | CT (3399) | TT (1927) | P1 | P2 | CC (600) | CT (518) | TT (124) | P1 | P2 | |
| Glucose, mg/dL | 121 ± 40 | 123 ± 42 | 120 ± 41 | 0.421 | 0.793 | 106 ± 1 | 106 ± 2 | 103 ± 3 | 0.562 | 0.923 |
| Total cholesterol, mg/dL | 211 ± 38 | 211 ± 38 | 212 ± 42 | 0.763 | 0.722 | 222 ± 2 | 218 ± 2 | 220 ± 4 | 0.277 | 0.159 |
| LDL-C, mg/dL | 131 ± 34 | 130 ± 34 | 131 ± 38 | 0.922 | 0.551 | 138 ± 2 | 134 ± 2 | 135 ± 3 | 0.219 | 0.153 |
| HDL-C, mg/dL | 53.3 ± 13.5 | 53.9 ± 14.0 | 54.2 ± 14.7 | 0.045 | 0.044 | 57.0 ± 0.6 | 57.2 ± 0.6 | 58.0 ± 1.3 | 0.765 | 0.756 |
| Triglycerides, mg/dL | 139 ± 85 | 136 ± 75 | 138 ± 82 | 0.989 | 0.591 | 136 ± 3 | 135 ± 3 | 130 ± 6 | 0.828 | 0.429 |
*Values are means ± Standard Error of Mean. The rs3754686 SNP was determined in the PREDIMED Study and imputed in the BPRHS. The proxy SNP rs309180 was used in GOLDN and WHI studies.
**General Linear Regression models with multivariable adjustment for the indicated covariates were fitted for each population.
1P adjusted by sex, age, field center or race.
2P adjusted for sex, age, field center or ancestry (BPRHS, WHI), family (GOLDN), BMI, smoking, drinking, physical activity, diabetes, medication and total energy intake.
In PREDIMED, some variables (glucose, LDL-C, HDL-C and triglycerides) included missing data point. Biochemical data were available for fasting glucose (n = 6801 participants) total cholesterol (n = 6920 participants), HDL cholesterol (n = 6837 participants), LDL cholesterol (n = 6782 participants), and triglycerides (n = 6881 participants).
Figure 4Meta-analysis of the association between the MCM6-rs3754686 polymorphism and fasting glucose according to sex in BPRHS, GOLDN, PREDIMED and WHI studies.
Forest plots: (A) men, (B) women, show adjusted regression coefficients and 95% CI (expressed in mg/dL and estimated per one copy of the T-allele; LCT genotypes coded as 0, 1, and 2 according to the number of T-alleles) for the corresponding intake in each study. The diamond shows the meta-analyzed associations in a fixed-effects model. The I2 statistic was calculated for heterogeneity. Pmeta-analysis indicates the P-value obtained in the meta-analysis including all populations. P’meta-analysis indicates the P-value for the meta-analysis obtained in the sensitivity analysis excluding the WHI AA women. P and P’ for sex differences indicate the P-values for heterogeneity by sex in the total (P) and the sensitivity (P’) meta-analysis.
Incidence and hazard ratios (HR) for cardiovascular diseases (CVD) and total mortality depending on the MCM6-rs3754686 proxy for milk intake after 4.8 years of median follow-up in the PREDIMED trial.
| CVD incidence (men + women): n = 7,185 | Model 3 | Model 4 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cases | Non-cases | person-y | Incidence rate* | Model 1 | Model 2 | |||||||
| HR | 95% CI | P-value | HR | 95% CI | P-value | P-value | P-value | |||||
| TT | 74 | 1908 | 8612 | 8.6 | 1.00 | (reference) | 1.00 | (reference) | ||||
| CT | 136 | 3410 | 15361 | 8.9 | 1.04 | (0.79–1.39) | 0.768 | 1.02 | (0.77–1.36) | 0.890 | 0.941 | 0.945 |
| CC | 57 | 1600 | 7016 | 8.1 | 0.94 | (0.66–1.33) | 0.733 | 0.95 | (0.69–1.35) | 0.764 | 0.981 | 0.815 |
| TT (ref.)*** | 1.00 | (reference) | 1.00 | (reference) | ||||||||
| (CC + TC) vs TT | 1.01 | (0.77–1.33) | 0.932 | 1.00 | (0.76–1.31) | 0.989 | 0.928 | 0.969 | ||||
| Per variant allele (T)**** | 1.03 | (0.87–1.22) | 0.767 | 1.02 | (0.86–1.22) | 0.785 | 0.792 | 0.829 | ||||
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | |||||||||
| TT | 104 | 1878 | 8622 | 12.1 | 1.00 | (reference) | 1.00 | (reference) | ||||
| CT | 139 | 3407 | 15375 | 9.0 | 0.73 | (0.58–0.97) | 0.029 | 0.75 | (0.58–0.97) | 0.028 | 0.028 | 0.030 |
| CC | 79 | 1579 | 7027 | 11.2 | 0.89 | (0.86–1.19) | 0.424 | 0.89 | (0.66–1.21) | 0.464 | 0.455 | 0.549 |
| TT (ref.)*** | 1.00 | (reference) | 1.00 | (reference) | ||||||||
| (CC + CT) vs TT | 0.80 | (0.63–1.01) | 0.057 | 0.79 | (0.62–1.01) | 0.058 | 0.057 | 0.068 | ||||
| Per variant allele (T)**** | 1.08 | (0.92–1.26) | 0.338 | 1.07 | (0.92–1.26) | 0.378 | 0.371 | 0.446 | ||||
*Crude incidence rates were expressed per 1000 person-years of follow-up.
**Codominant model. ***Recessive model.****Additive model.
We used multivariable Cox regression models with length of follow-up as the primary time variable. Separate models were fitted for CVD and total mortality to estimate the corresponding HRs depending on the model.
Model 1: Adjusted for sex, age, field center and dietary intervention group.
Model 2: Model 1 adjusted for variables in model 1 plus BMI, diabetes, drinking, smoking, physical activity, medication (hypertension, dyslipidemia and glucose) and total energy intake at baseline.
Model 3: Model 2 adjusted for variables in model 2 plus total milk intake. Model 4: Model 3 additionally adjusted for total fat and carbohydrates at baseline.
§P-value for interaction sex*MCM6 polymorphism in determining CVD incidence, obtained in Model 2. Further adjustments did not change the statistical significance.
§§P-value for interaction sex*MCM6 polymorphism in determining mortality, obtained in Model 2. Further adjustments did not change the statistical significance.
Figure 5Kaplan Meier curves of cumulative CVD-free survival or mortality free survival depending on the MCM6-rs3754686 polymorphism and sex in the PREDIMED participants.
N = 3065 men and n = 4120 women were analyzed: (A) CVD incidence in men, (B) CVD incidence in women, (C) total mortality in men and (D), total mortality in women. Multivariable Cox regression models with outcome of CVD incidence or total mortality were fitted as indicated in methods. HR and 95% CI were obtained in the multivariable adjusted models: HR1: Model 1 (adjusted for sex, age, field center and dietary intervention group) and HR2: Model 2 (adjusted for variables in model 1 plus BMI, diabetes, drinking, smoking, physical activity, medication (hypertension, dyslipemia and glucose) and total energy intake at baseline). For these estimations, as well for the interaction terms, a recessive model was computed. P for interactions between the MCM6 SNP and sex in the corresponding multivariable adjusted Cox regression model were P = 0.005 for CVD, and P = 0.032 for total mortality in Model 2.