OBJECTIVE: Determine how very-remote Indigenous community (RIC) food and beverage (F&B) turnover quantities and associated dietary intake estimates derived from only stores, compare with values derived from all community F&B providers. METHODS: F&B turnover quantity and associated dietary intake estimates (energy, micro/macronutrients and major contributing food types) were derived from 12-months transaction data of all F&B providers in three RICs (NT, Australia). F&B turnover quantities and dietary intake estimates from only stores (plus only the primary store in multiple-store communities) were expressed as a proportion of complete F&B provider turnover values. Food types and macronutrient distribution (%E) estimates were quantitatively compared. RESULTS: Combined stores F&B turnover accounted for the majority of F&B quantity (98.1%) and absolute dietary intake estimates (energy [97.8%], macronutrients [≥96.7%] and micronutrients [≥83.8%]). Macronutrient distribution estimates from combined stores and only the primary store closely aligned complete provider estimates (≤0.9% absolute). Food types were similar using combined stores, primary store or complete provider turnover. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Evaluating combined stores F&B turnover represents an efficient method to estimate total F&B turnover quantity and associated dietary intake in RICs. In multiple-store communities, evaluating only primary store F&B turnover provides an efficient estimate of macronutrient distribution and major food types.
OBJECTIVE: Determine how very-remote Indigenous community (RIC) food and beverage (F&B) turnover quantities and associated dietary intake estimates derived from only stores, compare with values derived from all community F&B providers. METHODS: F&B turnover quantity and associated dietary intake estimates (energy, micro/macronutrients and major contributing food types) were derived from 12-months transaction data of all F&B providers in three RICs (NT, Australia). F&B turnover quantities and dietary intake estimates from only stores (plus only the primary store in multiple-store communities) were expressed as a proportion of complete F&B provider turnover values. Food types and macronutrient distribution (%E) estimates were quantitatively compared. RESULTS: Combined stores F&B turnover accounted for the majority of F&B quantity (98.1%) and absolute dietary intake estimates (energy [97.8%], macronutrients [≥96.7%] and micronutrients [≥83.8%]). Macronutrient distribution estimates from combined stores and only the primary store closely aligned complete provider estimates (≤0.9% absolute). Food types were similar using combined stores, primary store or complete provider turnover. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Evaluating combined stores F&B turnover represents an efficient method to estimate total F&B turnover quantity and associated dietary intake in RICs. In multiple-store communities, evaluating only primary store F&B turnover provides an efficient estimate of macronutrient distribution and major food types.
Authors: Anne Magnus; Linda Cobiac; Julie Brimblecombe; Mark Chatfield; Anthony Gunther; Megan Ferguson; Marj Moodie Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-09-27 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Thomas P Wycherley; Jolieke C van der Pols; Mark Daniel; Natasha J Howard; Kerin O'Dea; Julie K Brimblecombe Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-05-31 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Tiff-Annie Kenny; Matthew Little; Tad Lemieux; P Joshua Griffin; Sonia D Wesche; Yoshitaka Ota; Malek Batal; Hing Man Chan; Melanie Lemire Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-11-27 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: J Brimblecombe; R Bailie; C van den Boogaard; B Wood; S C Liberato; M Ferguson; J Coveney; R Jaenke; J Ritchie Journal: SSM Popul Health Date: 2017-06-23