Literature DB >> 27624557

Initial foot contact and related kinematics affect impact loading rate in running.

Bastiaan Breine1, Philippe Malcolm1, Ine Van Caekenberghe1, Pieter Fiers1, Edward C Frederick2, Dirk De Clercq1.   

Abstract

This study assessed kinematic differences between different foot strike patterns and their relationship with peak vertical instantaneous loading rate (VILR) of the ground reaction force (GRF). Fifty-two runners ran at 3.2 m · s-1 while we recorded GRF and lower limb kinematics and determined foot strike pattern: Typical or Atypical rearfoot strike (RFS), midfoot strike (MFS) of forefoot strike (FFS). Typical RFS had longer contact times and a lower leg stiffness than Atypical RFS and MFS. Typical RFS showed a dorsiflexed ankle (7.2 ± 3.5°) and positive foot angle (20.4 ± 4.8°) at initial contact while MFS showed a plantar flexed ankle (-10.4 ± 6.3°) and more horizontal foot (1.6 ± 3.1°). Atypical RFS showed a plantar flexed ankle (-3.1 ± 4.4°) and a small foot angle (7.0 ± 5.1°) at initial contact and had the highest VILR. For the RFS (Typical and Atypical RFS), foot angle at initial contact showed the highest correlation with VILR (r = -0.68). The observed higher VILR in Atypical RFS could be related to both ankle and foot kinematics and global running style that indicate a limited use of known kinematic impact absorbing "strategies" such as initial ankle dorsiflexion in MFS or initial ankle plantar flexion in Typical RFS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Foot strike pattern; loading rate; midfoot strike; rearfoot strike; running style

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27624557     DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2016.1225970

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci        ISSN: 0264-0414            Impact factor:   3.337


  10 in total

1.  Impact Sound Across Rearfoot, Midfoot, and Forefoot Strike During Overground Running.

Authors:  Ivan Pui Hung Au; Leo Ng; Paul Davey; Marco So; Brian Chan; Pinky Li; Will Wong; Tania Althorpe; Sarah Michelle Stearne; Roy Cheung
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Effect of the Innovative Running Shoes With the Special Midsole Structure on the Female Runners' Lower Limb Biomechanics.

Authors:  Fengqin Fu; Lianming Guo; Xunfei Tang; Jiayu Wang; Zhihao Xie; Gusztáv Fekete; Yuhui Cai; Qiuli Hu; Yaodong Gu
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-06

3.  What are the Benefits and Risks Associated with Changing Foot Strike Pattern During Running? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Injury, Running Economy, and Biomechanics.

Authors:  Laura M Anderson; Daniel R Bonanno; Harvi F Hart; Christian J Barton
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Running speed-induced changes in foot contact pattern influence impact loading rate.

Authors:  Bastiaan Breine; Philippe Malcolm; Samuel Galle; Pieter Fiers; Edward C Frederick; Dirk De Clercq
Journal:  Eur J Sport Sci       Date:  2018-11-03       Impact factor: 3.980

5.  Measurement agreement between a newly developed sensing insole and traditional laboratory-based method for footstrike pattern detection in runners.

Authors:  Roy T H Cheung; Winko W An; Ivan P H Au; Janet H Zhang; Zoe Y S Chan; Alfred Man; Fannie O Y Lau; Melody K Y Lam; K K Lau; C Y Leung; N W Tsang; Louis K Y Sze; Gilbert W K Lam
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Twelve-Week Gait Retraining Reduced Patellofemoral Joint Stress during Running in Male Recreational Runners.

Authors:  Baofeng Wang; Yang Yang; Xini Zhang; Junqing Wang; Liqin Deng; Weijie Fu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Implications of sample size and acquired number of steps to investigate running biomechanics.

Authors:  Anderson Souza Oliveira; Cristina Ioana Pirscoveanu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  One hundred marathons in 100 days: Unique biomechanical signature and the evolution of force characteristics and bone density.

Authors:  Pieter Van den Berghe; Bastiaan Breine; Ella Haeck; Dirk De Clercq
Journal:  J Sport Health Sci       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 13.077

9.  Duty factor and foot-strike pattern do not represent similar running pattern at the individual level.

Authors:  Aurélien Patoz; Thibault Lussiana; Bastiaan Breine; Cyrille Gindre; Davide Malatesta
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 4.996

10.  PIMP Your Stride: Preferred Running Form to Guide Individualized Injury Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Cyrille Gindre; Bastiaan Breine; Aurélien Patoz; Kim Hébert-Losier; Adrien Thouvenot; Laurent Mourot; Thibault Lussiana
Journal:  Front Rehabil Sci       Date:  2022-05-31
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.