Literature DB >> 27624468

Estimation of myocardial strain from non-rigid registration and highly accelerated cine CMR.

Jonathan E N Langton1, Hoi-Ieng Lam2, Brett R Cowan2, Christopher J Occleshaw3, Ruvin Gabriel3, Boris Lowe3, Suzanne Lydiard3, Andreas Greiser4, Michaela Schmidt4, Alistair A Young5,6.   

Abstract

Sparsely sampled cardiac cine accelerated acquisitions show promise for faster evaluation of left-ventricular function. Myocardial strain estimation using image feature tracking methods is also becoming widespread. However, it is not known whether highly accelerated acquisitions also provide reliable feature tracking strain estimates. Twenty patients and twenty healthy volunteers were imaged with conventional 14-beat/slice cine acquisition (STD), 4× accelerated 4-beat/slice acquisition with iterative reconstruction (R4), and a 9.2× accelerated 2-beat/slice real-time acquisition with sparse sampling and iterative reconstruction (R9.2). Radial and circumferential strains were calculated using non-rigid registration in the mid-ventricle short-axis slice and inter-observer errors were evaluated. Consistency was assessed using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) and bias with Bland-Altman analysis. Peak circumferential strain magnitude was highly consistent between STD and R4 and R9.2 (ICC = 0.876 and 0.884, respectively). Average bias was -1.7 ± 2.0 %, p < 0.001, for R4 and -2.7 ± 1.9 %, p < 0.001 for R9.2. Peak radial strain was also highly consistent (ICC = 0.829 and 0.785, respectively), with average bias -11.2 ± 18.4 %, p < 0.001, for R4 and -15.0 ± 21.2 %, p < 0.001 for R9.2. STD circumferential strain could be predicted by linear regression from R9.2 with an R2 of 0.82 and a root mean squared error of 1.8 %. Similarly, radial strain could be predicted with an R2 of 0.67 and a root mean squared error of 21.3 %. Inter-observer errors were not significantly different between methods, except for peak circumferential strain R9.2 (1.1 ± 1.9 %) versus STD (0.3 ± 1.0 %), p = 0.011. Although small systematic differences were observed in strain, these were highly consistent with standard acquisitions, suggesting that accelerated myocardial strain is feasible and reliable in patients who require short acquisition durations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Iterative reconstruction; Non-rigid registration; Strain; Ventricular function

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27624468     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-016-0978-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  17 in total

1.  Reconstruction of dynamic image series from undersampled MRI data using data-driven model consistency condition (MOCCO).

Authors:  Julia V Velikina; Alexey A Samsonov
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Generalized spatiotemporal myocardial strain analysis for DENSE and SPAMM imaging.

Authors:  Alistair A Young; Bo Li; Robert S Kirton; Brett R Cowan
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  In-line automated tracking for ventricular function with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Bo Li; Yingmin Liu; Christopher J Occleshaw; Brett R Cowan; Alistair A Young
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-08

4.  Sparse MRI: The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging.

Authors:  Michael Lustig; David Donoho; John M Pauly
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  New noninvasive method for assessment of left ventricular rotation: speckle tracking echocardiography.

Authors:  Thomas Helle-Valle; Jonas Crosby; Thor Edvardsen; Erik Lyseggen; Brage H Amundsen; Hans-Jørgen Smith; Boaz D Rosen; João A C Lima; Hans Torp; Halfdan Ihlen; Otto A Smiseth
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Left ventricular mass and volume: fast calculation with guide-point modeling on MR images.

Authors:  A A Young; B R Cowan; S F Thrupp; W J Hedley; L J Dell'Italia
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Comparison of magnetic resonance feature tracking for strain calculation with harmonic phase imaging analysis.

Authors:  Kan N Hor; William M Gottliebson; Christopher Carson; Erin Wash; James Cnota; Robert Fleck; Janaka Wansapura; Piotr Klimeczek; Hussein R Al-Khalidi; Eugene S Chung; D Woodrow Benson; Wojciech Mazur
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-02

8.  Left ventricular mass and volume with telmisartan, ramipril, or combination in patients with previous atherosclerotic events or with diabetes mellitus (from the ONgoing Telmisartan Alone and in Combination With Ramipril Global Endpoint Trial [ONTARGET]).

Authors:  Brett R Cowan; Alistair A Young; Craig Anderson; Robert N Doughty; Rungroj Krittayaphong; Eva Lonn; Thomas H Marwick; Chris M Reid; John E Sanderson; Roland E Schmieder; Koon Teo; Angela K Wadham; Stephen G Worthley; Cheuk-Man Yu; Salim Yusuf; Garry L Jennings
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Statistical notes for clinical researchers: Evaluation of measurement error 1: using intraclass correlation coefficients.

Authors:  Hae-Young Kim
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2013-05

10.  Global and regional left ventricular myocardial deformation measures by magnetic resonance feature tracking in healthy volunteers: comparison with tagging and relevance of gender.

Authors:  Daniel Augustine; Adam J Lewandowski; Merzaka Lazdam; Aitzaz Rai; Jane Francis; Saul Myerson; Alison Noble; Harald Becher; Stefan Neubauer; Steffen E Petersen; Paul Leeson
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 5.364

View more
  4 in total

1.  Cardiovascular imaging 2017 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Johan H C Reiber; Amer Alaiti; Hiram G Bezerra; Johan De Sutter; Paul Schoenhagen; Arthur E Stillman; Nico R L Van de Veire
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Compressed sensing acceleration of cardiac cine imaging allows reliable and reproducible assessment of volumetric and functional parameters of the left and right atrium.

Authors:  Sebastian Altmann; Moritz C Halfmann; Ibukun Abidoye; Basel Yacoub; Michaela Schmidt; Philip Wenzel; Christoph Forman; U Joseph Schoepf; Fei Xiong; Christoph Dueber; Karl-Friedrich Kreitner; Akos Varga-Szemes; Tilman Emrich
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Feasibility of one breath-hold cardiovascular magnetic resonance compressed sensing cine for left ventricular strain analysis.

Authors:  Xiaorong Chen; Jiangfeng Pan; Yi Hu; Hongjie Hu; Yonghao Pan
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-08-12

4.  Comparison between conventional and compressed sensing cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance for feature tracking global circumferential strain assessment.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Kido; Kuniaki Hirai; Ryo Ogawa; Yuki Tanabe; Masashi Nakamura; Naoto Kawaguchi; Akira Kurata; Kouki Watanabe; Michaela Schmidt; Christoph Forman; Teruhito Mochizuki; Teruhito Kido
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 5.364

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.