Literature DB >> 27624117

Efficiency of genomic selection for breeding population design and phenotype prediction in tomato.

E Yamamoto1, H Matsunaga1, A Onogi2, A Ohyama3, K Miyatake1, H Yamaguchi1, T Nunome1, H Iwata2, H Fukuoka1.   

Abstract

Genomic selection (GS), which uses estimated genetic potential based on genome-wide genotype data for a breeding selection, is now widely accepted as an efficient method to improve genetically complex traits. We assessed the potential of GS for increasing soluble solids content and total fruit weight of tomato. A collection of big-fruited F1 varieties was used to construct the GS models, and the progeny from crosses was used to validate the models. The present study includes two experiments: a prediction of a parental combination that generates superior progeny and the prediction of progeny phenotypes. The GS models successfully predicted a better parent even if the phenotypic value did not vary substantially between candidates. The GS models also predicted phenotypes of progeny, although their efficiency varied depending on the parental cross combinations and the selected traits. Although further analyses are required to apply GS in an actual breeding situation, our results indicated that GS is a promising strategy for future tomato breeding design.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27624117      PMCID: PMC5234485          DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2016.84

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


  26 in total

1.  Accurate prediction of genetic values for complex traits by whole-genome resequencing.

Authors:  Theo Meuwissen; Mike Goddard
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  Breeding schemes for the implementation of genomic selection in wheat (Triticum spp.).

Authors:  Filippo M Bassi; Alison R Bentley; Gilles Charmet; Rodomiro Ortiz; Jose Crossa
Journal:  Plant Sci       Date:  2015-09-06       Impact factor: 4.729

3.  The impact of genetic relationship information on genome-assisted breeding values.

Authors:  D Habier; R L Fernando; J C M Dekkers
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions.

Authors:  P M VanRaden
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.034

5.  Genomic BLUP decoded: a look into the black box of genomic prediction.

Authors:  David Habier; Rohan L Fernando; Dorian J Garrick
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Genomic predictability of interconnected biparental maize populations.

Authors:  Christian Riedelsheimer; Jeffrey B Endelman; Michael Stange; Mark E Sorrells; Jean-Luc Jannink; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges.

Authors:  B J Hayes; P J Bowman; A J Chamberlain; M E Goddard
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.034

8.  Genomic prediction of trait segregation in a progeny population: a case study of Japanese pear (Pyrus pyrifolia).

Authors:  Hiroyoshi Iwata; Takeshi Hayashi; Shingo Terakami; Norio Takada; Toshihiro Saito; Toshiya Yamamoto
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 2.797

9.  Genome-wide association studies using single nucleotide polymorphism markers developed by re-sequencing of the genomes of cultivated tomato.

Authors:  Kenta Shirasawa; Hiroyuki Fukuoka; Hiroshi Matsunaga; Yuhko Kobayashi; Issei Kobayashi; Hideki Hirakawa; Sachiko Isobe; Satoshi Tabata
Journal:  DNA Res       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 4.458

10.  Genomic selection and association mapping in rice (Oryza sativa): effect of trait genetic architecture, training population composition, marker number and statistical model on accuracy of rice genomic selection in elite, tropical rice breeding lines.

Authors:  Jennifer Spindel; Hasina Begum; Deniz Akdemir; Parminder Virk; Bertrand Collard; Edilberto Redoña; Gary Atlin; Jean-Luc Jannink; Susan R McCouch
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  7 in total

1.  Multiple haplotype-based analyses provide genetic and evolutionary insights into tomato fruit weight and composition.

Authors:  Jiantao Zhao; Christopher Sauvage; Frédérique Bitton; Mathilde Causse
Journal:  Hortic Res       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 6.793

2.  Tomato genomic prediction for good performance under high-temperature and identification of loci involved in thermotolerance response.

Authors:  Elisa Cappetta; Giuseppe Andolfo; Anna Guadagno; Antonio Di Matteo; Amalia Barone; Luigi Frusciante; Maria Raffaella Ercolano
Journal:  Hortic Res       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 6.793

3.  Leveraging a graft collection to develop metabolome-based trait prediction for the selection of tomato rootstocks with enhanced salt tolerance.

Authors:  Chao Song; Tania Acuña; Michal Adler-Agmon; Shimon Rachmilevitch; Simon Barak; Aaron Fait
Journal:  Hortic Res       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 7.291

4.  Neighbor GWAS: incorporating neighbor genotypic identity into genome-wide association studies of field herbivory.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Sato; Eiji Yamamoto; Kentaro K Shimizu; Atsushi J Nagano
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  A Variational Bayes Genomic-Enabled Prediction Model with Genotype × Environment Interaction.

Authors:  Osval A Montesinos-López; Abelardo Montesinos-López; José Crossa; José Cricelio Montesinos-López; Francisco Javier Luna-Vázquez; Josafhat Salinas-Ruiz; José R Herrera-Morales; Raymundo Buenrostro-Mariscal
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 3.154

6.  IonBreeders: bioinformatics plugins toward genomics-assisted breeding.

Authors:  Eri Ogiso-Tanaka; Shiori Yabe; Tsuyoshi Tanaka
Journal:  Breed Sci       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 2.086

7.  Genomic Selection for Prediction of Fruit-Related Traits in Pepper (Capsicum spp.).

Authors:  Ju-Pyo Hong; Nayoung Ro; Hea-Young Lee; Geon Woo Kim; Jin-Kyung Kwon; Eiji Yamamoto; Byoung-Cheorl Kang
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 5.753

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.