Literature DB >> 27623783

Vertebral artery and osseous anomalies characteristic at the craniocervical junction diagnosed by CT and 3D CT angiography in normal Czech population: analysis of 511 consecutive patients.

P Vaněk1, Ondřej Bradáč2, P de Lacy3, R Konopková4, J Lacman5, V Beneš1.   

Abstract

There are numerous indications for stabilization using instrumentation of the upper cervical spine. This area is comprised of sophisticated anatomy. There is no study describing bony and vascular anomalies of this area in the middle European population. The main aim of this study was to investigate prevalence of any vertebral artery (VA) variations and osseous anomalies in the region of the craniocervical junction in a large sample of Czech patients based on three-dimensional computed tomographic angiography (3D CTA). The VA has a variable course through C2 before it passes above its groove on the posterior arch of C1. The artery can course more medially, more posteriorly or more superiorly, thus limiting the diameter of the bony elements used as landmarks for the safe insertion of metalwork. This is known as a high-riding VA (HRVA). The VA was considered HRVA in this study if the thickness of the C2 isthmus was less than 5 mm and/or the C2 internal height was less than 2 mm and/or the width of the C2 pedicle was less than 4 mm. The prevalence of ponticulus posticus (PP) was also identified. Following the VA variations in the V3 segment of the artery were persistent first intersegmental artery (FIA), fenestration (FEN) of the VA, and the posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) branch originating from the C1/2 part of VA. Records of 511 patients from our institution were analyzed. The mean age of the patients was 63.6 years. One hundred and twenty-three (24.1 %) patients were identified to have HRVA, 30 (6 %) present on both sides. The age of patient over 70 years and female sex were found to be significant risk factors for HRVA presence. The prevalence of a nearby PICA branch was 4 %, FIA was 0.4 %, and FEN was 0.2 %. The presence of PP was identified in 14.3 % of patients. The HRVA and PP are common anomalies in the Czech population, and routine preoperative high-resolution CT evaluation is mandatory to prevent the VA injury when C1-C2 instrumentation is planned. The female sex and age over 70 years were found to be the most important factors for HRVA presence. The FIA and the FEN VA were rare in our study contrary to reports published from Asia, showing as many as a 10 % the VA presence over the starting point for C1 lateral screw. On the basis of the infrequent occurrence of these anomalies, we do not recommend routine CT angiography when upper cervical spine instrumentation in the normal population is planned.

Entities:  

Keywords:  C2 vertebra; High-riding vertebral artery; Ponticulus posticus; Surgical anatomy; Vascular anomaly

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27623783     DOI: 10.1007/s10143-016-0784-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Rev        ISSN: 0344-5607            Impact factor:   3.042


  20 in total

1.  Anatomic study of the axis for surgical planning of transarticular screw fixation.

Authors:  Tamaki Igarashi; Shinichi Kikuchi; Katsuhiko Sato; Satoru Kayama; Koji Otani
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Comparison of the anatomical risk for vertebral artery injury associated with the C2-pedicle screw and atlantoaxial transarticular screw.

Authors:  Makoto Yoshida; Masashi Neo; Shunsuke Fujibayashi; Takashi Nakamura
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Vertebral artery injury with transarticular screws.

Authors:  A Goel; S Gupta
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 5.115

4.  CT analysis of the axis for transarticular screw fixation of rheumatoid atlantoaxial instability.

Authors:  Sung Soo Chung; Chong Suh Lee; Hye Won Chung; Chang Seok Kang
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2006-06-27       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Ipsilateral arcuate foramen and high-riding vertebral artery: implication on C1-C2 instrumentation.

Authors:  Hossein Elgafy; Frank Pompo; Ryan Vela; Haitham M Elsamaloty
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 6.  Anomalous vertebral arteries in the extra- and intraosseous regions of the craniovertebral junction visualized by 3-dimensional computed tomographic angiography: analysis of 100 consecutive surgical cases and review of the literature.

Authors:  Masashi Yamazaki; Akihiko Okawa; Takeo Furuya; Tsuyoshi Sakuma; Hiroshi Takahashi; Kei Kato; Takayuki Fujiyoshi; Chikato Mannoji; Kazuhisa Takahashi; Masao Koda
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Cerebellar infarction: natural history, prognosis, and pathology.

Authors:  R A Macdonell; R M Kalnins; G A Donnan
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1987 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  Is rheumatoid arthritis a risk factor for a high-riding vertebral artery?

Authors:  Masahiko Miyata; Masashi Neo; Hiromu Ito; Makoto Yoshida; Koichi Miyaki; Shunsuke Fujibayashi; Takeo Nakayama; Takashi Nakamura
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Vertebral artery variations and osseous anomaly at the C1-2 level diagnosed by 3D CT angiography in normal subjects.

Authors:  Norimitsu Wakao; Mikinobu Takeuchi; Manabu Nishimura; K Daniel Riew; Mitsuhiro Kamiya; Atsuhiko Hirasawa; Katsuhisa Kawanami; Shiro Imagama; Keiji Sato; Masakazu Takayasu
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 2.804

10.  Vertebral artery anomalies at the craniovertebral junction in the US population.

Authors:  Courtney M OʼDonnell; Zachary A Child; Quynh Nguyen; Paul A Anderson; Michael J Lee
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  8 in total

1.  Atlas posterior arch and vertebral artery's groove variants: a classification, morphometric study, clinical and surgical implications.

Authors:  Konstantinos Natsis; Evangelia-Theophano Piperaki; Moschos Fratzoglou; Nikolaos Lazaridis; Parmenion P Tsitsopoulos; Αlexandros Samolis; Michael Kostares; Maria Piagkou
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  The computed tomographic evaluation of bony bridge of C1 as bleeding risk factor at the screw placement.

Authors:  Murat Golpinar; Erdal Komut; Hande Salim; Figen Govsa
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  [The effect of axis pedicle and intra-axial vertebral artery on C 2 pedicle screw placement].

Authors:  Fan Wu; Hong Li; Shengyu Wan; Tao Gao; Haigang Hu; Xu Lin; Zeli Zhong; Jun Zeng; Chao Wu; Lun Tan
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2022-07-15

Review 4.  Prevalence of Vertebral artery anomaly in upper cervical and its surgical implications: a systematic review.

Authors:  Xi Lin; Hou-Jun Zhu; Yang Xu; Ting Zheng; Fei-Yue Lin; Xiao-Ming Yin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-10-03       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Proposing a new algorithm for premanipulative testing in physical therapy practice.

Authors:  Brent Harper; Daniel Miner; Harrison Vaughan
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2020-11-11

6.  A Computed Tomographic Study of Vietnamese C1-C2 Morphology for Atlantoaxial Crew Fixation Techniques.

Authors:  Nguyen Duy Hung; Nguyen Minh Duc; Le Viet Dung; Than Van Sy; Le Thanh Dung; Nguyen Duy Hue
Journal:  J Clin Imaging Sci       Date:  2020-10-13

Review 7.  Risk of the high-riding variant of vertebral arteries at C2 is increased over twofold in rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tomasz Klepinowski; Jagoda Cembik; Leszek Sagan
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 3.042

8.  Prevalence of high-riding vertebral arteries and narrow C2 pedicles among Central-European population: a computed tomography-based study.

Authors:  Tomasz Klepinowski; Natalia Żyłka; Bartłomiej Pala; Wojciech Poncyljusz; Leszek Sagan
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 3.042

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.