Marcello Picchio1, Walter Elisei, Giovanni Brandimarte, Francesco Di Mario, Peter Malfertheiner, Carmelo Scarpignato, Antonio Tursi. 1. *Division of Surgery, "P. Colombo" Hospital, ASL RMH, Velletri †Division of Gastroenterology, ASL RMH, Albano Laziale ‡Division of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, "Cristo Re" Hospital, GIOMI Group, Rome §Department of Clinical & Experimental Medicine, Gastroenterology Unit ¶Department of Clinical & Experimental Medicine, Clinical Pharmacology & Digestive Pathophysiology Unit, University of Parma #Gastroenterology Service, ASL BAT, Andria (BT), Italy ∥Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease (SUDD) is a common gastrointestinal disease, because it affects about one fourth of the patient harboring colonic diverticula. GOAL: To assess the effectiveness of mesalazine in improving symptoms (namely abdominal pain) and in preventing diverticulitis occurrence in patients with SUDD. STUDY: Only randomized clinical trials (irrespective of language, blinding, or publication status) that compared mesalazine with placebo or any other therapy in SUDD were evaluated. The selected endpoints were symptom relief and diverticulitis occurrence at maximal follow-up. Absolute risk reduction (ARR, with 95% confidence interval) and the number needed to treat were used as measures of the therapeutic effect. RESULTS: Six randomized clinical trials enrolled 1021 patients: 526 patients were treated with mesalazine and 495 with placebo or other therapies. Symptom relief with mesalazine was always larger than that with placebo and other therapies. However, absolute risk reduction was significant only when mesalazine was compared with placebo, a high-fiber diet, and low-dose rifaximin. The incidence of diverticulitis with mesalazine was lower than that observed with placebo and other treatments, being significant only when compared with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Mesalazine is effective in achieving symptom relief and primary prevention of diverticulitis in patients with SUDD.
BACKGROUND: Symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease (SUDD) is a common gastrointestinal disease, because it affects about one fourth of the patient harboring colonic diverticula. GOAL: To assess the effectiveness of mesalazine in improving symptoms (namely abdominal pain) and in preventing diverticulitis occurrence in patients with SUDD. STUDY: Only randomized clinical trials (irrespective of language, blinding, or publication status) that compared mesalazine with placebo or any other therapy in SUDD were evaluated. The selected endpoints were symptom relief and diverticulitis occurrence at maximal follow-up. Absolute risk reduction (ARR, with 95% confidence interval) and the number needed to treat were used as measures of the therapeutic effect. RESULTS: Six randomized clinical trials enrolled 1021 patients: 526 patients were treated with mesalazine and 495 with placebo or other therapies. Symptom relief with mesalazine was always larger than that with placebo and other therapies. However, absolute risk reduction was significant only when mesalazine was compared with placebo, a high-fiber diet, and low-dose rifaximin. The incidence of diverticulitis with mesalazine was lower than that observed with placebo and other treatments, being significant only when compared with placebo. CONCLUSIONS:Mesalazine is effective in achieving symptom relief and primary prevention of diverticulitis in patients with SUDD.
Authors: Cesare Cremon; Marilia Carabotti; Rosario Cuomo; Fabio Pace; Paolo Andreozzi; Maria Raffaella Barbaro; Bruno Annibale; Giovanni Barbara Journal: United European Gastroenterol J Date: 2019-04-20 Impact factor: 4.623
Authors: Antonio Tursi; Walter Elisei; Marcello Picchio; Gabriella Nasi; Angela Maria Mastromatteo; Francesco Di Mario; Enrico Di Rosa; Maria Alessandra Brandimarte; Giovanni Brandimarte Journal: Ann Transl Med Date: 2017-08
Authors: Johan Friso Lock; Christian Galata; Christoph Reißfelder; Jörg-Peter Ritz; Thomas Schiedeck; Christoph-Thomas Germer Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2020-08-31 Impact factor: 5.594