BACKGROUND: In lung transplantation (LTx), patients with thoracic muscle sarcopenia may have to require longer to recovery. We measured thoracic muscle volume by using the cross sectional area (CSA) and assessed its effect on early outcomes after LTx. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted to evaluate the effect of thoracic sarcopenia in patients undergoing LTx between January 2010 and July 2015. The lowest CSA quartile (Q1) was defined as sarcopenia. RESULTS: In total, 109 patients were enrolled. The mean CSA was 58.24±15.82 cm(2). Patients in the highest CSA quartile were more likely to be male (92.6% vs. 17.9%, P<0.001), older (55.2±10.1 vs. 43.2±14.9 years, P=0.001), to have a higher body mass index (BMI) (22.3±4.0 vs. 19.4±3.7 kg/m(2), P=0.007), and to have pulmonary fibrosis (85.2% vs. 35.7%, P=0.003) compared with the lowest CSA quartile. Early outcomes including ventilator support duration [32.9±49.2 vs. 24.5±39.9 days, P= not significant (ns)], intensive care unit (ICU) stay duration (28.4±43.7 vs. 24.4±35.9 days, P= ns) and hospital stay duration (61.4±48.2 vs. 50.8±37.2 days, P= ns) tended to be longer in Q1 than Q4, but the difference was not significant. However, the 1-year survival rate was better in Q1 compared with Q4 (66.6% vs. 46.0%, P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Although patients with thoracic sarcopenia seem to require a longer post-operative recovery time after LTx, this does not compromise their early outcomes. By contrast, patients with larger thoracic muscle volume (Q4) showed poorer survival times.
BACKGROUND: In lung transplantation (LTx), patients with thoracic muscle sarcopenia may have to require longer to recovery. We measured thoracic muscle volume by using the cross sectional area (CSA) and assessed its effect on early outcomes after LTx. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted to evaluate the effect of thoracic sarcopenia in patients undergoing LTx between January 2010 and July 2015. The lowest CSA quartile (Q1) was defined as sarcopenia. RESULTS: In total, 109 patients were enrolled. The mean CSA was 58.24±15.82 cm(2). Patients in the highest CSA quartile were more likely to be male (92.6% vs. 17.9%, P<0.001), older (55.2±10.1 vs. 43.2±14.9 years, P=0.001), to have a higher body mass index (BMI) (22.3±4.0 vs. 19.4±3.7 kg/m(2), P=0.007), and to have pulmonary fibrosis (85.2% vs. 35.7%, P=0.003) compared with the lowest CSA quartile. Early outcomes including ventilator support duration [32.9±49.2 vs. 24.5±39.9 days, P= not significant (ns)], intensive care unit (ICU) stay duration (28.4±43.7 vs. 24.4±35.9 days, P= ns) and hospital stay duration (61.4±48.2 vs. 50.8±37.2 days, P= ns) tended to be longer in Q1 than Q4, but the difference was not significant. However, the 1-year survival rate was better in Q1 compared with Q4 (66.6% vs. 46.0%, P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Although patients with thoracic sarcopenia seem to require a longer post-operative recovery time after LTx, this does not compromise their early outcomes. By contrast, patients with larger thoracic muscle volume (Q4) showed poorer survival times.
Authors: Roger D Yusen; Leah B Edwards; Anna Y Kucheryavaya; Christian Benden; Anne I Dipchand; Samuel B Goldfarb; Bronwyn J Levvey; Lars H Lund; Bruno Meiser; Joseph W Rossano; Josef Stehlik Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Date: 2015-09-03 Impact factor: 10.247
Authors: James R Walsh; Daniel C Chambers; Rebecca J Davis; Norman R Morris; Helen E Seale; Stephanie T Yerkovich; Peter M A Hopkins Journal: Clin Transplant Date: 2013-07-02 Impact factor: 2.863
Authors: D Langer; C Burtin; L Schepers; A Ivanova; G Verleden; M Decramer; T Troosters; R Gosselink Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2012-03-05 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: William F Kanasky; Stephen D Anton; James R Rodrigue; Michael G Perri; Thomas Szwed; Maher A Baz Journal: Chest Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Karine Marquis; Richard Debigaré; Yves Lacasse; Pierre LeBlanc; Jean Jobin; Guy Carrier; François Maltais Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2002-09-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Jon Kobashigawa; Darshana Dadhania; Sangeeta Bhorade; Deborah Adey; Joseph Berger; Geetha Bhat; Marie Budev; Andres Duarte-Rojo; Michael Dunn; Shelley Hall; Meera N Harhay; Kirsten L Johansen; Susan Joseph; Cassie C Kennedy; Evan Kransdorf; Krista L Lentine; Raymond J Lynch; Mara McAdams-DeMarco; Shunji Nagai; Michael Olymbios; Jignesh Patel; Sean Pinney; Joanna Schaenman; Dorry L Segev; Palak Shah; Lianne G Singer; Jonathan P Singer; Christopher Sonnenday; Puneeta Tandon; Elliot Tapper; Stefan G Tullius; Michael Wilson; Martin Zamora; Jennifer C Lai Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2018-12-22 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Michael J Pienta; Peng Zhang; Brian A Derstine; Binu Enchakalody; William B Weir; Tyler Grenda; Rebecca Goulson; Rishindra M Reddy; Andrew C Chang; Stewart C Wang; Jules Lin Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2017-12-02 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Carla M Prado; Sarah A Purcell; Carolyn Alish; Suzette L Pereira; Nicolaas E Deutz; Daren K Heyland; Bret H Goodpaster; Kelly A Tappenden; Steven B Heymsfield Journal: Ann Med Date: 2018-09-12 Impact factor: 4.709
Authors: Young Hoon Cho; Kyung Hyun Do; Eun Jin Chae; Se Hoon Choi; Kyung Wook Jo; Sang Oh Lee; Sang Bum Hong Journal: Korean J Radiol Date: 2019-03 Impact factor: 3.500