Literature DB >> 2762108

Apparent motion: evidence of the influence of shape, slant, and size on the correspondence process.

A Mack, L Klein, J Hill, D Palumbo.   

Abstract

Four stimulus elements configured as a notional diamond were flashed in pairs to elicit apparent motion. When the elements were identical (4 Zs), the direction of apparent motion was ambiguous. When the elements were pairs of different letters (Cs and Os, Es and Zs), letters of different sizes (Zs and zs), or oppositely oblique lines, the direction of apparent motion tended to be between identical elements. This was true, however, only for an initial, brief observation period. Subsequently, the direction of apparent motion tended to be determined by the direction of motion perceived at first, regardless of the character of the elements. This quickly established directional set (within 10 sec) largely swamped any tendency to resolve correspondence in terms of a feature of the stimulus. It appears to be based on spatial rather than retinal or egocentric coordinates.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2762108     DOI: 10.3758/bf03204983

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  11 in total

1.  Irrelevance of figural identity for resolving ambiguities in apparent motion.

Authors:  D Navon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1976-02       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Apparent motion occurs only between similar spatial frequencies.

Authors:  A B Watson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  What determines correspondence strength in apparent motion?

Authors:  M Green
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Direction and frequency specific processing in the perception of long-range apparent movement.

Authors:  P Kruse; M Stadler; T Wehner
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Figural change in apparent motion.

Authors:  P A Kolers; J R Pomerantz
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1971-01

6.  Low spatial frequencies dominate apparent motion.

Authors:  V S Ramachandran; A P Ginsburg; S M Anstis
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  Dimensions of figural identity and apparent motion.

Authors:  K Berbaum; J C Lenel; M Rosenbaum
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Time, distance, and feature trade-offs in visual apparent motion.

Authors:  P Burt; G Sperling
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  The effect of similarity between line segments on the correspondence strength in apparent motion.

Authors:  S Ullman
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 1.490

10.  Visual inertia in apparent motion.

Authors:  S Anstis; V S Ramachandran
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  2 in total

1.  Spatial phase differences can drive apparent motion.

Authors:  A B Sekuler; P J Bennett
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-02

2.  Spatio-temporal priority revisited: the role of feature identity and similarity for object correspondence in apparent motion.

Authors:  Elisabeth Hein; Cathleen M Moore
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 3.332

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.