Literature DB >> 27619803

Is there light at the end of the tunnel?-new perspectives in ECMO survival.

Federico Pappalardo1, Andrea Montisci2.   

Abstract

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a state of systemic hypoperfusion, secondary to a deficit in cardiac contractile activity. Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) accounts for the majority of cases of CS, with a high mortality rate, despite the great improvements in revascularisation therapy. Nowadays, mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in CS often represents the only therapeutic approach able to restore systemic perfusion, determining a survival benefit. Recently, many efforts have been made to identify factors associated with mortality in patients receiving MCS devices. New insights into the pathophysiology of CS prompted the concept that the use of MCS should be considered early in the course of the disease, before the progression to multiorgan dysfunction. However, many questions remain unsolved and randomised trials in this field are hard to perform. Looking at the future, the timely implantation of temporary MCS, the correct selection of patient, the concomitant use of different temporary devices, the improvement in weaning strategies and the increasing use of durable devices as a destination or bridge therapy appear to be the most promising areas of development.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; myocardial infarction; shock, cardiogenic

Year:  2016        PMID: 27619803      PMCID: PMC4999729          DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2016.07.69

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Dis        ISSN: 2072-1439            Impact factor:   2.895


  54 in total

1.  Intraaortic balloon counterpulsation and microcirculation in cardiogenic shock complicating myocardial infarction: an IABP-SHOCK II substudy.

Authors:  Christian Jung; Georg Fuernau; Suzanne de Waha; Ingo Eitel; Steffen Desch; Gerhard Schuler; Hans R Figulla; Holger Thiele
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 5.460

2.  Cerebral outcome in adult patients treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Authors:  Ivar Risnes; Kari Wagner; Terje Nome; Kjetil Sundet; Jorun Jensen; Inger Annette Hynås; Thor Ueland; Thore Pedersen; Jan Ludvig Svennevig
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Complications of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for treatment of cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest: a meta-analysis of 1,866 adult patients.

Authors:  Richard Cheng; Rory Hachamovitch; Michelle Kittleson; Jignesh Patel; Francisco Arabia; Jaime Moriguchi; Fardad Esmailian; Babak Azarbal
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Recommendations for the use of mechanical circulatory support: device strategies and patient selection: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Jennifer L Peura; Monica Colvin-Adams; Gary S Francis; Kathleen L Grady; Timothy M Hoffman; Mariell Jessup; Ranjit John; Michael S Kiernan; Judith E Mitchell; John B O'Connell; Francis D Pagani; Michael Petty; Pasala Ravichandran; Joseph G Rogers; Marc J Semigran; J Matthew Toole
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Heart transplantation vs long-term mechanical assist devices: clinical equipoise?

Authors:  Sara J Shumway
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 4.191

6.  Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (IABP-SHOCK II): final 12 month results of a randomised, open-label trial.

Authors:  Holger Thiele; Uwe Zeymer; Franz-Josef Neumann; Miroslaw Ferenc; Hans-Georg Olbrich; Jörg Hausleiter; Antoinette de Waha; Gert Richardt; Marcus Hennersdorf; Klaus Empen; Georg Fuernau; Steffen Desch; Ingo Eitel; Rainer Hambrecht; Bernward Lauer; Michael Böhm; Henning Ebelt; Steffen Schneider; Karl Werdan; Gerhard Schuler
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support in refractory cardiogenic shock: treatment strategies and analysis of risk factors.

Authors:  Antonio Loforte; Giuseppe Marinelli; Francesco Musumeci; Gianluca Folesani; Emanuele Pilato; Sofia Martin Suarez; Andrea Montalto; Paola Lilla Della Monica; Francesco Grigioni; Guido Frascaroli; Antonio Menichetti; Roberto Di Bartolomeo; Giorgio Arpesella
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 3.094

8.  Impaired microcirculation predicts poor outcome of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Corstiaan A den Uil; Wim K Lagrand; Martin van der Ent; Lucia S D Jewbali; Jin M Cheng; Peter E Spronk; Maarten L Simoons
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 29.983

9.  Temporal Trends and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions for Cardiogenic Shock in the Setting of Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Report From the CathPCI Registry.

Authors:  Siddharth A Wayangankar; Sripal Bangalore; Lisa A McCoy; Hani Jneid; Faisal Latif; Wassef Karrowni; Konstantinos Charitakis; Dmitriy N Feldman; Habib A Dakik; Laura Mauri; Eric D Peterson; John Messenger; Mathew Roe; Debabrata Mukherjee; Andrew Klein
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 11.195

Review 10.  Microcirculation in cardiogenic shock: from scientific bystander to therapy target.

Authors:  Christian Jung; Alexander Lauten; Markus Ferrari
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-09-06       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.