| Literature DB >> 27618837 |
Pietro Carotenuto1, Matteo Fassan2,3, Rosantony Pandolfo1, Andrea Lampis1, Caterina Vicentini3, Luciano Cascione4, Viola Paulus-Hock5, Luke Boulter6, Rachel Guest7, Luca Quagliata8, Jens Claus Hahne1, Rachel Ridgway9, Tam Jamieson9, Dimitris Athineos9, Angelo Veronese10, Rosa Visone10, Claudio Murgia9, Giulia Ferrari1, Vincenza Guzzardo2, Thomas Ronald Jeffry Evans5, Martin MacLeod5, Gui Ji Feng11, Trevor Dale11, Massimo Negrini12, Stuart J Forbes7, Luigi Terracciano8, Aldo Scarpa3, Tushar Patel13, Nicola Valeri1,14, Paul Workman1, Owen Sansom9, Chiara Braconi1,14.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Transcribed-ultraconserved regions (T-UCR) are long non-coding RNAs which are conserved across species and are involved in carcinogenesis. We studied T-UCRs downstream of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway in liver cancer.Entities:
Keywords: BILARY DUCT CARCINOMA; CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA; HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA; RNA EXPRESSION
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27618837 PMCID: PMC5530482 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312278
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Gut ISSN: 0017-5749 Impact factor: 23.059
Figure 1Transcribed-ultraconserved regions (T-UCR) profiling in an Apc hypomorphic hepatocarcinoma (HCC) mouse model. (A) T-UCRs aberrantly expressed in Apcfl/fl (n:3) versus control Apc+/+ (n:3) mice livers. Fold change has been plotted against p values, with lowest p values being on the top of the y-axis. T-UCRs highlighted in red are those that were common across the two profiling comparing Apcfl/fl versus Apc+/+ and comparing Apcfl/fl versus diethylnitrosamine (DEN)-induced HCC (n:3). (B) Validation of T-UCR expression by real-time PCR. Bars represent mean±SD of four samples.
Figure 2uc.158− expression is dependent on Wnt/β-catenin pathway in human malignant hepatocytes. (A) Immunofluorescence was performed for β-catenin (CTNNB1) and Hoechst in a panel of malignant hepatocytes. Scale bar: 50 μm (B) Expression of uc.158− was assessed in the same panel of malignant hepatocytes by real-time PCR. Bars represent mean±SD of three independent samples. (C) uc.158− expression was assessed by real-time PCR in the liver of wild-type (WT) and Axin1fl/fl/Cre mice. Bars represent mean±SD of six samples. p>0.05. (D) Huh-7 cells were treated with 25 mM LiCl or diluent control for 24 hours and cells collected to assess induction of β-catenin protein expression by western blotting, induction of nuclear localisation by immunofluorescence and expression of uc.158− by real-time PCR. Bars represent mean±SD of three experiments. (E) HepG2 cells were transfected with siRNA against CTNNB1 (siCTNNB1) or siRNA CTRL (50 nM) for 48 hours, and cells collected to assess reduction in expression of CTNNB1 mRNA, protein expression and expression of uc.158− by real-time PCR. Bars represent mean±SD of three experiments. (F) HepG2 cells were treated with 50 μM ICG-001 for 24 hours, and cells collected to assess downregulation of drug-target mRNAs and expression of uc.158− by real-time PCR. Bars represent mean±SD of three experiments.
Figure 3uc.158− expression in human hepatocarcinoma (HCC) tissues. (A) Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded human liver tissues have been analysed for the expression of uc.158− by RNA in situ hybridisation and for CTNNB1 protein expression by immunohistochemistry. Scale bars: 200 μM for the top and bottom line, 50 μM for the second line. (B) DNA and RNA were extracted from 15 frozen HCC tissues and used for uc.158− expression by real-time PCR and sequencing analysis for APC, AXIN1 and exon 3 of CTNNB1. The circled orange dot represents a case with mutation of APC. Bars represent median with IQR. Mann-Whitney test, exact two-tailed p value: 0.04.
Figure 4Apc deletion does not induce uc.158− in the absence of tumour. Conditional Apc deletion induced by β-napthoflavone injection in AhCre+Apc+/+ and AhCre+Apcfl/fl mice on day 1. Mice (n=3 for each group) were euthanised on day 4, and liver weighed and processed for downstream analyses. (A) IHC analysis for CTNNB1 and BrDU. Scale bar: 10 μM (B) Liver weight is expressed as percentage of the whole body weight (median and range). (C) Expression of uc.158− (median and range).
Figure 5uc.158− expression in cholangiocarcinoma. (A) RNA was extracted from frozen intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) (n: 5) and normal liver (n:8) tissues and assessed for uc.158− expression by real-time PCR. Bars represent mean±SE. (B) In four cases, CCA and matched adjacent tissues from the same patients were available. Bars represent uc.158− expression in tumour tissue relative to the expression in the adjacent normal tissue. Fold change tumour/normal (T/N) is reported for each case on the top of the bars. (C) A tissue microarray of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded human tissues including 54 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), 31 extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECC), 17 gallbladder cancers (GBC) and 8 normal liver tissues was assessed for expression of uc.158− by RNA in situ hybridisation (ISH) with AS3 probe. Pictures of representative cases are shown. (D) RNA was extracted from the liver of thiocetamide (TAA)-treated (with CCA) or vehicle-treated (normal) rats for 26 weeks and analysed for uc.158− expression by real-time PCR. Bars represent mean±SD of three samples. (E) Rats with TAA-induced CCA were treated with the CTNNB1-CTBP inhibitor ICG-001 (5 mg/kg) or PORCN inhibitor C-59 (20 mg/kg) or saline vehicle by intraperitoneal injection three times per week, from week 21 to 26. At 26 weeks, rats were sacrificed, and uc.158− expression assessed by real-time PCR. Bars represent mean±SD of four samples.
Figure 6uc.158− inhibition reduces cancer cell growth. (A) HepG2 cells were reverse-transfected with GAPMER probes anti-uc.158− GAP1 and GAP3 or control-scrambled probe (CTRL) in 96 well plates, and cell viability assessed by CellTiter-Blue after 72 hours. Non-transfected (untreated) cells were added as control for transfection toxicity. Representative pictures and quantification of seven replicates with mean±SD are represented. Scale bar: 400 μM. (B) HepG2 cells were transfected, and analysis of cell-cycle distribution was performed by flow cytometry. Quantification of three experiments (mean±SD) is shown on the left. The representative picture on the right shows peaks for cells transfected with CTRL, GAP1 and GAP3 probes. In the red square, representative zoom of the sub-G0/G1 peak. (C) HepG2 cells were reverse-transfected in 96 well plates, and activation of caspase 3/7 was assessed by luminescence assay. Staurosporine was added as positive control. Bars represent mean±SD of three replicates. Asterisks indicate p value by t-test analysis. Analysis of variance comparison was performed comparing all the groups, or only the three experimental groups (CTRL, GAP1, GAP3), with the following results: p:0.0004 and p:0.0012, respectively, at 6 hours; p<0.0001 for both comparisons at 24 hours. (D) HepG2 cells were transfected with GAPMER probe anti-uc.158− GAP1 or CTRL-scrambled probe and then fixed in formalin and embedded in paraffin. Immunohistochemistry was then performed for caspase 3. Representative pictures of two independent experiments are shown. (E) HepG2 cells were reverse-transfected with anti-uc.158− GAP1 and GAP3 or control probe in 100 mm dishes and then plated in ultra low attachment (ULA) 96-well plates to form spheroids. Imaging and quantitation were performed after 7 days with Celigo. Bars represent mean±SD of six replicates. (F) Once the spheroids were formed, they were moved to flat-bottom, gelatin-coated 96-well plates, and migration was assessed at different time points through Celigo.
Figure 7miR-193b expression is dependent on uc.158− expression. HepG2 cells were transfected in 100 mm dishes for 48 hours, and RNA extracted to assess microRNA expression by TaqMan assays. Bars represent mean±SD of three experiments. (B) miR-193b expression was assessed in Huh-7 and HepG2 cells. Bars represent logarithmic expression of miR-193b in Huh-7 versus HepG2. In three independent experiments, miR-193b expression was higher in Huh-7 in comparison with HepG2. (C) Huh-7 cells were transfected with a vector overexpressing uc.158− or an empty vector for 48 hours. Expression of uc.158− and miR-193b was assessed by real-time PCR. Bars represent the logarithmic expression of ncRNAs in cells transfected with uc-158− vector compared with empty vector. The downregulation of mR-193 is quantitatively comparable with the upregulation achieved in panel A. (D) HepG2 cells were transfected with GAPMER control or GAP1 alone or in association with anti-miR-193b, and cell viability assessed by CellTiter-Blue at 48 hours. Bars represent mean±SD of six replicates. (E) Sera were collected from patients with hepatocarcinoma (HCC) naïve for any treatment (n:10), and microRNA extracted using fixed starting volume. miR-193b was assessed by TaqMan assay. χ2 test was used to assess the correlation between miR-193b and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) groups.