Literature DB >> 27617347

A general model framework for multisymbol number comparison.

Stefan Huber1, Hans-Christoph Nuerk2, Klaus Willmes3, Korbinian Moeller1.   

Abstract

Different models have been proposed for the processing of multisymbol numbers like two- and three-digit numbers but also for negative numbers and decimals. However, these multisymbol numbers are assembled from the same set of Arabic digits and comply with the place-value structure of the Arabic number system. Considering these shared properties, we suggest that the processing of multisymbol numbers can be described in one general model framework. Accordingly, we first developed a computational model framework realizing componential representations of multisymbol numbers and evaluated its validity by simulating standard empirical effects of number magnitude comparison. We observed that the model framework successfully accounted for most of these effects. Moreover, our simulations provided first evidence supporting the notion of a fully componential processing of multisymbol numbers for the specific case of comparing two negative numbers. Thus, our general model framework indicates that the processing of different kinds of multisymbol integer and decimal numbers shares common characteristics (e.g., componential representation). The relevance and applicability of our model goes beyond the case of basic number processing. In particular, we also successfully simulated effects from applied marketing and consumer research by accounting for the left-digit effect found in processing of prices. Finally, we provide evidence that our model framework can be integrated into the more general context of multiattribute decision making. In sum, this indicates that our model framework captures a general scheme of separate processing of different attributes weighted by their saliency for the task at hand. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27617347     DOI: 10.1037/rev0000040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rev        ISSN: 0033-295X            Impact factor:   8.934


  14 in total

1.  The processing of price comparison is not holistic but componential.

Authors:  Pedro Macizo; Fernando Ojedo
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-06-24

2.  Individual differences influence two-digit number processing, but not their analog magnitude processing: a large-scale online study.

Authors:  Stefan Huber; Hans-Christoph Nuerk; Ulf-Dietrich Reips; Mojtaba Soltanlou
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-12-23

3.  Automatic place-value activation in magnitude-irrelevant parity judgement.

Authors:  Krzysztof Cipora; Mojtaba Soltanlou; Stefan Smaczny; Silke M Göbel; Hans-Christoph Nuerk
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-11-16

4.  Symbol grounding of number words in the subitization range.

Authors:  Mia Šetić Beg; Jakov Čičko; Dražen Domijan
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-11-13

5.  No power: exponential expressions are not processed automatically as such.

Authors:  Ami Feder; Mariya Lozin; Michal Pinhas
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-07-23

6.  Reduced choice-confidence in negative numerals.

Authors:  Santiago Alonso-Díaz; Gabriel I Penagos-Londoño
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 3.752

7.  Cognitive control in number processing: new evidence from number compatibility effects in task-switching.

Authors:  A Schliephake; J Bahnmueller; K Willmes; I Koch; K Moeller
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2022-02-08

8.  Bringing Back the Balance: Domain-General Processes Are Also Important in Numerical Cognition.

Authors:  Mateusz Hohol; Krzysztof Cipora; Klaus Willmes; Hans-Christoph Nuerk
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-03-30

9.  Symbolic Number Comparison Is Not Processed by the Analog Number System: Different Symbolic and Non-symbolic Numerical Distance and Size Effects.

Authors:  Attila Krajcsi; Gábor Lengyel; Petia Kojouharova
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-02-09

10.  When approximate number acuity predicts math performance: The moderating role of math anxiety.

Authors:  Emily J Braham; Melissa E Libertus
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.