Literature DB >> 32705335

No power: exponential expressions are not processed automatically as such.

Ami Feder1, Mariya Lozin2, Michal Pinhas2.   

Abstract

Little is known about the mental representation of exponential expressions. The present study examined the automatic processing of exponential expressions under the framework of multi-digit numbers, specifically asking which component of the expression (i.e., the base/power) is more salient during this type of processing. In a series of three experiments, participants performed a physical size comparison task. They were presented with pairs of exponential expressions that appeared in frames that differed in their physical sizes. Participants were instructed to ignore the stimuli within the frames and choose the larger frame. In all experiments, the pairs of exponential expressions varied in the numerical values of their base and/or power component. We manipulated the compatibility between the base and the power components, as well as their physical sizes to create a standard versus nonstandard syntax of exponential expressions. Experiments 1 and 3 demonstrate that the physically larger component drives the size congruity effect, which is typically the base but was manipulated here in some cases to be the power. Moreover, Experiments 2 and 3 revealed similar patterns, even when manipulating the compatibility between base and power components. Our findings support componential processing of exponents by demonstrating that participants were drawn to the physically larger component, even though in exponential expressions, the power, which is physically smaller, has the greater mathematical contribution. Thus, revealing that the syntactic structure of an exponential expression is not processed automatically. We discuss these results with regard to multi-digit numbers research.
© 2020. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32705335     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-020-01381-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  38 in total

1.  Cognitive representation of negative numbers.

Authors:  Martin H Fischer
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2003-05

2.  Size congruity effects with two-digit numbers: expanding the number line?

Authors:  Daniel Fitousi; Daniel Algom
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-03

3.  Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two-digit number comparison.

Authors:  S Dehaene; E Dupoux; J Mehler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  On the relation between skilled performance of simple division and multiplication.

Authors:  J I Campbell
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Are 1/2 and 0.5 represented in the same way?

Authors:  Dana Ganor-Stern
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2013-02-16

6.  The psychophysics of numerical comparison: a reexamination of apparently incompatible data.

Authors:  S Dehaene
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-06

7.  Automatic place-value activation in magnitude-irrelevant parity judgement.

Authors:  Krzysztof Cipora; Mojtaba Soltanlou; Stefan Smaczny; Silke M Göbel; Hans-Christoph Nuerk
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-11-16

8.  Children's intuitive mathematics: the development of knowledge about nonlinear growth.

Authors:  Mirjam Ebersbach; Friedrich Wilkening
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb

9.  Evidence for direct retrieval of relative quantity information in a quantity judgment task: decimals, integers, and the role of physical similarity.

Authors:  Dale J Cohen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  The mental representation of numerical fractions: real or integer?

Authors:  Mario Bonato; Sara Fabbri; Carlo Umiltà; Marco Zorzi
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.