Literature DB >> 27616823

A Novel Perforator Flap Training Model Using a Chicken Leg.

Ignacio J Cifuentes1, Ricardo A Yañez1, Maria C Salisbury1, José R Rodriguez1, Julian E Varas2, Bruno L Dagnino1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Living animal models are frequently used for perforator flap dissection training, but no ex vivo models have been described. The aim of this study is to present a novel nonliving model for perforator flap training based on a constant perforator in the chicken leg.
METHODS: A total of 15 chicken legs were used in this study. Anatomical dissection of the perforator was performed after its identification using ink injection, and in four of these specimens a perforator-based flap was raised.
RESULTS: The anatomical dissection revealed a constant intramuscular perforator with a median length of 5.7 cm. Median proximal and distal vessel diameters were 0.93 and 0.4 mm, respectively. The median dissection time was 77.5 minutes.
CONCLUSION: This study introduces a novel, affordable, and reproducible model for the intramuscular dissection of a perforator-based flap using an ex vivo animal model. Its consistent perforator and appropriate-sized vessels make it useful for training.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chicken; microsurgery; perforator flap; training

Year:  2016        PMID: 27616823      PMCID: PMC5017028          DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1581124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hand Microsurg        ISSN: 0974-3227


  18 in total

1.  New training model for reconstructive microsurgery.

Authors:  Marcos Kenzo Funatsu; Daniel Esteban; Américo Helene Junior; Márcia Balbino Hoyos
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Pulsatile perfused porcine coronary arteries for microvascular training.

Authors:  Harald Schoffl; Dietmar Hager; Christian Hinterdorfer; Karin M Dunst; Stefan Froschauer; Wolfgang Steiner; Oskar Kwasny; Georg M Huemer
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.539

3.  Is there a "learning curve" for muscle perforator flaps?

Authors:  Geoffrey G Hallock
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.539

4.  Why not perforator flap training models in rats?

Authors:  Shuji Kayano; Masahiro Nakagawa; Shogo Nagamatsu; Takuya Koizumi; Satoshi Akazawa
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  The use of supermicrosurgery in lower extremity reconstruction: the next step in evolution.

Authors:  Joon Pio Hong
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  Using perforators as recipient vessels (supermicrosurgery) for free flap reconstruction of the knee region.

Authors:  Joon Pio Hong; Isao Koshima
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.539

7.  Abstract 39: the pig as an ideal training model for perforator flap dissection in living tissue.

Authors:  Alexandru Nistor; L Jiga; D Georgescu; G Miclaus; S Barac; B Hoinoiu; C Dumbuleu; M Ionac
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Microsurgical training regimen with nonliving chicken models.

Authors:  Jose Couceiro; Tuna Ozyurekoglu; Sara Sanders; Huey Tien
Journal:  Microsurgery       Date:  2012-11-24       Impact factor: 2.425

9.  The Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Learning Curve in the Current Era.

Authors:  Damien G Grinsell; Gavin W McCoubrey; James P Finkemeyer
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.539

10.  A mini pig model for visualization of perforator flap by using angiography and MIMICS.

Authors:  Jin Mei; ZhiXun Yin; Ji Zhang; Koonhei W Lui; Siwang Hu; Zhou Peng; Shixin Chen; Maolin Tang
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2009-11-14       Impact factor: 1.246

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.