Simon B Goldberg1, William T Hoyt1, Helene A Nissen-Lie2, Stevan Lars Nielsen3, Bruce E Wampold1,4. 1. a Department of Counseling Psychology , University of Wisconsin-Madison , Madison , WI , USA. 2. b Department of Psychology , University of Oslo , Oslo , Norway. 3. c Counseling and Psychological Services , Brigham Young University , Provo , UT , USA. 4. d Modum Bad Psychiatric Center , Vikersund , Norway.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Differences between therapists in their average outcomes (i.e., therapist effects) have become a topic of increasing interest in psychotherapy research in the past decade. Relatively little work, however, has moved beyond identifying the presence of significant between-therapist variability in patient outcomes. The current study sought to examine the ways in which therapist effects emerge over the course of time in psychotherapy. METHOD: We used a large psychotherapy data set (n = 5828 patients seen by n = 158 therapists for 50,048 sessions of psychotherapy) and examined whether outcomes diverge for high-performing (HP) and low-performing (LP) therapists as treatment duration increases. RESULTS: Therapists accounted for a small but significant proportion of variance in patient outcomes that was not explained by differences between therapists' caseload characteristics. The discrepancy in outcomes between HP and LP therapists increased as treatment duration increased (interaction coefficient = 0.071, p < .001). In addition, patients' trajectories of change were a function of their therapist's average outcome as well as the patient's duration of treatment (interaction coefficient = 0.060, p = .040). CONCLUSIONS: Indeed, patterns of change previously described ignoring between-therapist differences (e.g., dose-effect, good-enough level model) may vary systematically when disaggregated by therapist effect.
OBJECTIVE: Differences between therapists in their average outcomes (i.e., therapist effects) have become a topic of increasing interest in psychotherapy research in the past decade. Relatively little work, however, has moved beyond identifying the presence of significant between-therapist variability in patient outcomes. The current study sought to examine the ways in which therapist effects emerge over the course of time in psychotherapy. METHOD: We used a large psychotherapy data set (n = 5828 patients seen by n = 158 therapists for 50,048 sessions of psychotherapy) and examined whether outcomes diverge for high-performing (HP) and low-performing (LP) therapists as treatment duration increases. RESULTS: Therapists accounted for a small but significant proportion of variance in patient outcomes that was not explained by differences between therapists' caseload characteristics. The discrepancy in outcomes between HP and LP therapists increased as treatment duration increased (interaction coefficient = 0.071, p < .001). In addition, patients' trajectories of change were a function of their therapist's average outcome as well as the patient's duration of treatment (interaction coefficient = 0.060, p = .040). CONCLUSIONS: Indeed, patterns of change previously described ignoring between-therapist differences (e.g., dose-effect, good-enough level model) may vary systematically when disaggregated by therapist effect.
Authors: Simon B Goldberg; Scott A Baldwin; Kritzia Merced; Derek D Caperton; Zac E Imel; David C Atkins; Torrey Creed Journal: Behav Ther Date: 2019-05-24
Authors: Joseph Wielgosz; Simon B Goldberg; Tammi R A Kral; John D Dunne; Richard J Davidson Journal: Annu Rev Clin Psychol Date: 2018-12-10 Impact factor: 18.561
Authors: Magnus Nordmo; Nils Martin Sønderland; Odd E Havik; Dag-Erik Eilertsen; Jon T Monsen; Ole Andre Solbakken Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2020-05-20 Impact factor: 4.157