Literature DB >> 27616435

Palatal wound healing using a xenogeneic collagen matrix - histological outcomes of a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Daniel S Thoma1, Monika Hilbe2, Stefan P Bienz1, Manuel Sancho-Puchades1, Christoph H F Hämmerle1, Ronald E Jung1.   

Abstract

AIM: The aim of this study was to test whether or not a collagen matrix can improve early wound healing compared to spontaneous healing based on histological and immunohistologic analyses.
METHODS: In 20 volunteers, 6 mm punch biopsies were harvested at the palate. A xenogeneic collagen matrix (XCM) was sutured in one site; the other one was left untreated (control). Biopsies with a diameter of 8 mm were subsequently obtained at 4, 8, 15 and 29 days and histological and immunohistologic analyses were performed.
RESULTS: At day 4, wound bed keratinization amounted to 12.4 ± 7.5% (control) and 18.0 ± 10.2% (XCM). This increased up to day 8 (19.7 ± 25.5% control; 29.1 ± 8.0% XCM) and reached complete keratinization at day 15 in both groups. The quantitative analyses of the superficial compartment measured an increase in the amount of granulation tissue (32-88% control; 14-41% XCM) from day 4 to day 8. Angiogenesis was first detected at 8 days. At day 29, the amount of connective tissue in all compartments reached values similar to the native tissue at baseline.
CONCLUSIONS: The application of a XCM as a wound dressing on palatal wounds might be beneficial in the early stages of wound healing. Further research with a larger sample size is needed to confirm these results.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  keratinized tissue; soft tissue augmentation; substitute; transplant (MeSH terms) collagen matrix; wound healing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27616435     DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12624

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Periodontol        ISSN: 0303-6979            Impact factor:   8.728


  4 in total

1.  Clinical and histologic evaluation of different approaches to gain keratinized tissue prior to implant placement in fully edentulous patients.

Authors:  Daniel S Thoma; AbdulMonem Alshihri; Alain Fontolliet; Christoph H F Hämmerle; Ronald E Jung; Goran I Benic
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Comparison of acellular dermal matrix allografts and connective tissue autografts in soft-tissue augmentation around immediate implants: A pilot study.

Authors:  M Panwar; Manab Kosala; Dushyant Malik; Deepak Sharma
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2021-04-02

3.  Alvogyl and absorbable gelatin sponge as palatal wound dressings following epithelialized free gingival graft harvest: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Karim Ehab; Omneya Abouldahab; Abdallah Hassan; Karim M Fawzy El-Sayed
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  How Thick Is the Oral Mucosa around Implants after Augmentation with Different Materials: A Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of Substitute Matrices in Comparison to Connective Tissue Grafts.

Authors:  Martin Lissek; Martin Boeker; Arndt Happe
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 5.923

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.