Literature DB >> 36147428

Comparison of acellular dermal matrix allografts and connective tissue autografts in soft-tissue augmentation around immediate implants: A pilot study.

M Panwar1, Manab Kosala2, Dushyant Malik3, Deepak Sharma4.   

Abstract

Background: Immediate implant has multiple advantages but does not prevent the reduction in dimension of the labial cortical plate due to bone remodelling and soft-tissue collapse along with gingival recession. This Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) was carried out to evaluate the changes in peri-implant soft-tissue dimensions after the immediate implant along with soft-tissue augmentation with acellular dermal matrix and connective tissue autografts.
Methods: Twenty clinical cases requiring tooth extraction in the anterior region of the maxilla (single rooted tooth) were selected and randomly divided. An immediate implant with soft-tissue augmentation with acellular dermal matrix (group A) and connective tissue autografts (group B) was carried out. Clinical parameters such as thickness of the marginal gingiva (mm), width of the keratinized mucosa (KMW) (mm), dimensions of the interdental papilla between the implant and the adjacent teeth (mesial and distal) and gingival biotype around the implant at the baseline (before extraction of the tooth) and at 180 days (after implant placement during second-stage surgical exposure) were evaluated.
Results: The mean postoperative gingival thickness and KMW were statistically higher in group B than in group A. There was statistically significant intragroup decrease in papillary height in both the groups; however, intergroup change was insignificant. In both the groups, there was an increase in thickness of gingival tissue, but the gingival biotype remained thin.
Conclusion: Immediate implants augmented with connective tissue autografts showed an increase in thickness of the gingiva and KMW, reduced papillary collapse and improvement in tissue biotype as compared with the acellular dermal matrix.
© 2021 Director General, Armed Forces Medical Services. Published by Elsevier, a division of RELX India Pvt. Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acellular dermal matrix; Connective tissue graft; Immediate implant

Year:  2021        PMID: 36147428      PMCID: PMC9485765          DOI: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2020.11.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India        ISSN: 0377-1237


  28 in total

1.  Factors affecting soft tissue level around anterior maxillary single-tooth implants.

Authors:  Kanokwan Nisapakultorn; Supreda Suphanantachat; Onanong Silkosessak; Suthee Rattanamongkolgul
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2010-04-05       Impact factor: 5.977

Review 2.  Long-term outcomes of soft tissue augmentation around dental implants on soft and hard tissue stability: a systematic review.

Authors:  Roberto Rotundo; Umberto Pagliaro; Elena Bendinelli; Marco Esposito; Jacopo Buti
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 5.977

3.  Randomized controlled clinical study comparing a volume-stable collagen matrix to autogenous connective tissue grafts for soft tissue augmentation at implant sites: linear volumetric soft tissue changes up to 3 months.

Authors:  Marco Zeltner; Ronald E Jung; Christoph H F Hämmerle; Jürg Hüsler; Daniel S Thoma
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2017-02-11       Impact factor: 8.728

4.  Management of localized buccal dehiscence defect with allografts and acellular dermal matrix.

Authors:  Sang-Hoon Park; Hom-Lay Wang
Journal:  Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Contour Management of Implant Restorations for Optimal Emergence Profiles: Guidelines for Immediate and Delayed Provisional Restorations.

Authors:  Oscar González-Martín; Ernesto Lee; Arnold Weisgold; Mario Veltri; Huan Su
Journal:  Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent       Date:  2020 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The success rate of immediate implant placement of mandibular molars: a clinical and radiographic retrospective evaluation between 2 and 8 years.

Authors:  Roberto M Hayacibara; Camila S Gonçalves; João Garcez-Filho; Osvaldo Magro-Filho; Helen Esper; Mitsue F Hayacibara
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 5.977

Review 7.  Soft tissue management for dental implants: what are the most effective techniques? A Cochrane systematic review.

Authors:  Marco Esposito; Hassan Maghaireh; Maria Gabriella Grusovin; Ioannis Ziounas; Helen V Worthington
Journal:  Eur J Oral Implantol       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.123

8.  Width of keratinized gingiva and the health status of the supporting tissues around dental implants.

Authors:  Anil Bouri; Nabil Bissada; Mohammad S Al-Zahrani; Fady Faddoul; Imad Nouneh
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.804

9.  Long-standing plaque and gingivitis at implants and teeth in the dog.

Authors:  I Ericsson; T Berglundh; C Marinello; B Liljenberg; J Lindhe
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 5.977

10.  How Thick Is the Oral Mucosa around Implants after Augmentation with Different Materials: A Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of Substitute Matrices in Comparison to Connective Tissue Grafts.

Authors:  Martin Lissek; Martin Boeker; Arndt Happe
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.