Literature DB >> 27614965

Diagnostic accuracy of 3-T magnetic resonance imaging with 3D T1 VIBE versus computer tomography in pars stress fracture of the lumbar spine.

E C Ang1, A F Robertson1, F A Malara1, T O'Shea1, J K Roebert1, M E Schneider2, A H Rotstein3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of 3-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with thin-slice 3D T1 VIBE sequence to 128-slice computer tomography (CT) in pars stress fractures of the lumbar spine.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 3-T MRI and CT of 24 patients involving 70 pars interarticularis were retrospectively reviewed by four blinded radiologists. The fracture morphology (complete, incomplete, or normal) was assessed on MRI and CT at different time points. Pars interarticularis bone marrow edema (present or absent) was also evaluated on MRI.
RESULTS: In total, 14 complete fractures, 31 incomplete fractures and 25 normal pars were detected by CT. Bone marrow edema was seen in seven of the complete and 25 of the incomplete fractures. The overall sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of MRI in detecting fractures (complete and incomplete) were 97.7, 92.3, and 95.7 %, respectively. MRI was 100 % accurate in detecting complete fractures. For incomplete fractures, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of MRI were 96.7, 92.0, and 94.6 %, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: 3-T MRI with thin-slice 3D T1 VIBE is 100 % accurate in diagnosing complete pars fractures and has excellent diagnostic ability in the detection and characterization of incomplete pars stress fractures compared to CT. MRI has the added advantages of detecting bone marrow edema and does not employ ionizing radiation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3-T MRI; Lumbar spine; Pars stress fracture; Pars stress reaction; Three-dimensional T1 VIBE

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27614965     DOI: 10.1007/s00256-016-2475-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  18 in total

1.  The prevalence of spondylolysis in the Spanish elite athlete.

Authors:  T Soler; C Calderón
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 2.  Spondylolysis in the adolescent athlete.

Authors:  Han Jo Kim; Daniel W Green
Journal:  Curr Opin Pediatr       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.856

Review 3.  Current concepts in the diagnosis and treatment of spondylolysis in young athletes.

Authors:  Michael D McCleary; Joseph A Congeni
Journal:  Curr Sports Med Rep       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.733

Review 4.  Spine injuries in the sport of gymnastics.

Authors:  David Kruse; Brooke Lemmen
Journal:  Curr Sports Med Rep       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.733

5.  Juvenile spondylolysis: a comparative analysis of CT, SPECT and MRI.

Authors:  R S D Campbell; A J Grainger; I G Hide; S Papastefanou; C G Greenough
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2004-11-25       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Defects of pars interarticularis in athletes: a protocol for nonoperative treatment.

Authors:  J Blanda; D Bethem; W Moats; M Lew
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1993-10

7.  Whole-body MRI for metastases screening: a preliminary study using 3D VIBE sequences with automatic subtraction between noncontrast and contrast enhanced images.

Authors:  Vivien Thomson; Jean-Baptiste Pialat; Frédéric Gay; Agnès Coulon; Alain Voloch; Anne Granier; Jean-Claude Guérin; Magalie Viallon; Yves Berthezene
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.339

8.  Low-back pain in adolescent athletes: detection of stress injury to the pars interarticularis with SPECT.

Authors:  R D Bellah; D A Summerville; S T Treves; L J Micheli
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Bone scintigraphy in the assessment of spondylolysis in patients attending a sports injury clinic.

Authors:  S Elliott; M A Hutson; M L Wastie
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 2.350

10.  Treatment of symptomatic spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis with the modified Boston brace.

Authors:  M E Steiner; L J Micheli
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  10 in total

1.  Diagnostic accuracy of MR imaging for direct visualization of lumbar pars defect in children and young adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Amira Dhouib; Anne Tabard-Fougere; Sylviane Hanquinet; Romain Dayer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-09-23       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  VIBE MRI: an alternative to CT in the imaging of sports-related osseous pathology?

Authors:  Eamon Koh; Edward Rj Walton; Phil Watson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Ultrashort Time-to-Echo Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 3 T for the Detection of Spondylolysis in Cadaveric Spines: Comparison With CT.

Authors:  Tim Finkenstaedt; Palanan Siriwanarangsun; Suraj Achar; Michael Carl; Sina Finkenstaedt; Nirusha Abeydeera; Christine B Chung; Won C Bae
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 6.016

4.  Gray scale inversion imaging (GSI) in Trauma and Orthopaedics.

Authors:  A Shah; K P Iyengar; R Botchu
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-02-16

Review 5.  The value of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in the study of spinal disorders.

Authors:  Fernando Ruiz Santiago; Antonio Jesús Láinez Ramos-Bossini; Yì Xiáng J Wáng; José Pablo Martínez Barbero; Jade García Espinosa; Alberto Martínez Martínez
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-07

6.  Diagnostic accuracy of MRI for identifying posterior element bone stress injury in athletes with low back pain: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.

Authors:  Roy Esh; Linn Helen J Grødahl; Robert Kerslake; Kate Strachan; Simon Spencer; Louise Fawcett; Alison Rushton; Nicola R Heneghan
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2020-10-02

7.  Diagnostic abilities of 3T MRI for assessing mandibular invasion of squamous cell carcinoma in the oral cavity: comparison with 64-row multidetector CT.

Authors:  Noriko Suzuki; Ami Kuribayashi; Kei Sakamoto; Junichiro Sakamoto; Shin Nakamura; Hiroshi Watanabe; Hiroyuki Harada; Tohru Kurabayashi
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 2.419

8.  TI VIBE inversion MRI - An alternative to CT for imaging of hip pain.

Authors:  A Subramanian; G Hegde; C Azzopardi; A M Davies; A Patel; S L James; R Botchu
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-05-27

9.  The progression of the vertebral body bruise associated with a spinal fracture.

Authors:  Young-Woo Kim; Seong-Hwan Moon; Sung Hye Koh; Ki Tae Kim; Won Yong Yoon; Jeong Hwan Lee; Seonghyeon Kim; Paul S Sung; Moon Soo Park
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 10.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Computed Tomography for Three-Dimensional Bone Imaging of Musculoskeletal Pathologies: A Review.

Authors:  Mateusz C Florkow; Koen Willemsen; Vasco V Mascarenhas; Edwin H G Oei; Marijn van Stralen; Peter R Seevinck
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 5.119

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.