Literature DB >> 27614710

Assessing residual contamination and damage inside flexible endoscopes over time.

Cori L Ofstead1, Harry P Wetzler2, John E Eiland2, Otis L Heymann2, Sarah B Held3, Michael J Shaw4.   

Abstract

Researchers evaluated flexible endoscope damage and contamination levels at baseline and 2 months later. Postcleaning test results exceeded benchmarks for all gastroscopes and no colonoscopes. Microbial growth was found in samples from 47% of fully reprocessed endoscopes at baseline and 60% at follow-up. Borescope examinations identified scratches, discoloration, debris, and fluid inside endoscopes. Irregularities changed over time. Study evaluations allowed damaged and contaminated endoscopes to be identified and re-reprocessed or sent for repairs. Copyright Â
© 2016 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Adenosine triphosphate; Colonoscope; Epidemiology; Gastroscope; Microbial cultures; Reprocessing

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27614710     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2016.06.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Infect Control        ISSN: 0196-6553            Impact factor:   2.918


  8 in total

1.  Scoping the scope: endoscopic evaluation of endoscope working channels with a new high-resolution inspection endoscope (with video).

Authors:  Monique T Barakat; Mohit Girotra; Robert J Huang; Subhas Banerjee
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 2.  An update on gastrointestinal endoscopy-associated infections and their contributing factors.

Authors:  Charles Eugenio McCafferty; Marra Jai Aghajani; David Abi-Hanna; Iain Bruce Gosbell; Slade Owen Jensen
Journal:  Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 3.944

3.  Duodenoscope-Associated Infections beyond the Elevator Channel: Alternative Causes for Difficult Reprocessing.

Authors:  Gheorghe G Balan; Irina Rosca; Elena-Laura Ursu; Adrian Fifere; Cristian-Dragos Varganici; Florica Doroftei; Ioana-Andreea Turin-Moleavin; Vasile Sandru; Gabriel Constantinescu; Daniel Timofte; Gabriela Stefanescu; Anca Trifan; Catalin Victor Sfarti
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 4.  Duodenoscope-associated infection prevention: A call for evidence-based decision making.

Authors:  Cori L Ofstead; Brandy L Buro; Krystina M Hopkins; John E Eiland; Harry P Wetzler; David R Lichtenstein
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2020-11-17

5.  Evaluation of an overnight non-culture test for detection of viable Gram-negative bacteria in endoscope channels.

Authors:  Harminder Singh; Donald R Duerksen; Gale Schultz; Carol Reidy; Pat DeGagne; Nancy Olson; Zoann Nugent; Michelle J Alfa
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2019-01-30

Review 6.  Recent Advances in Endoscope Disinfection: Where Do We Stand in the COVID era?

Authors:  Tiffany Chua; Nasir Halim; Sofiya Reicher
Journal:  Tech Innov Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2020-10-19

7.  Initial application of deep learning to borescope detection of endoscope working channel damage and residue.

Authors:  Monique T Barakat; Mohit Girotra; Subhas Banerjee
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2022-01-14

Review 8.  A narrative review on current duodenoscope reprocessing techniques and novel developments.

Authors:  Maarten Heuvelmans; Herman F Wunderink; Henny C van der Mei; Jan F Monkelbaan
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 4.887

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.