Literature DB >> 27614640

Microplastics affect assimilation efficiency in the freshwater amphipod Gammarus fossarum.

Pascal Blarer1, Patricia Burkhardt-Holm2,3.   

Abstract

An important issue in assessing microplastics is whether this newly emerging type of pollution affects freshwater invertebrates. This study was designed to examine the interactions between the amphipod Gammarus fossarum and two types of microplastics. To determine the ingestion and egestion of polyamide (PA) fibres (500 × 20 μm), amphipods were exposed to four concentrations (100, 540, 2680, 13,380 PA fibres cm-2 base area of glass beakers) and four exposure times (0.5, 2, 8, 32 h) as well as four post-exposure times (1, 2, 4, 16 h). We demonstrate a positive correlation between concentration and ingestion of PA fibres. Fibres were found in the gut after 0.5 h of exposure. Egestion was rapid and the digestive tract was empty 16 h after exposure ended. To investigate whether polystyrene (PS) beads (1.6 μm) can be taken up in the epithelial cells of the gut and the midgut glands, four concentrations (500, 2500, 12,500, 60,000 PS beads mL-1) were tested. Cryosections exhibited fluorescent PS beads only within the gut lumen. In a 28-day feeding experiment with both, fibres and beads, we studied the amphipod's feeding rate, assimilation efficiency and wet weight change. The exposure to PA fibres (2680 PA fibres cm-2 base area of glass beakers) significantly reduced the assimilation efficiency of the animals. While both tested polymer types are ingested and egested, PA fibres can impair the health and ecological functions of freshwater amphipods under continuous exposure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amphipod; Assimilation; Feeding; Freshwater toxicology; Gammarus fossarum; Ingestion; Limnology; Microplastics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27614640     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-016-7584-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  33 in total

1.  Lost at sea: where is all the plastic?

Authors:  Richard C Thompson; Ylva Olsen; Richard P Mitchell; Anthony Davis; Steven J Rowland; Anthony W G John; Daniel McGonigle; Andrea E Russell
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-05-07       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Contamination of beach sediments of a subalpine lake with microplastic particles.

Authors:  Hannes K Imhof; Natalia P Ivleva; Johannes Schmid; Reinhard Niessner; Christian Laforsch
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Ingestion and transfer of microplastics in the planktonic food web.

Authors:  Outi Setälä; Vivi Fleming-Lehtinen; Maiju Lehtiniemi
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 8.071

4.  Altered behavior, physiology, and metabolism in fish exposed to polystyrene nanoparticles.

Authors:  Karin Mattsson; Mikael T Ekvall; Lars-Anders Hansson; Sara Linse; Anders Malmendal; Tommy Cedervall
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  A comparison of plastic and plankton in the north Pacific central gyre.

Authors:  C J Moore; S L Moore; M K Leecaster; S B Weisberg
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.553

6.  Effects of peak exposure scenarios on Gammarus fossarum using field relevant pesticide mixtures.

Authors:  Mirco Bundschuh; Jochen P Zubrod; Patricia Klemm; David Elsaesser; Christoph Stang; Ralf Schulz
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 6.291

7.  Fate of microplastics in the marine isopod Idotea emarginata.

Authors:  Julia Hämer; Lars Gutow; Angela Köhler; Reinhard Saborowski
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Microplastic ingestion decreases energy reserves in marine worms.

Authors:  Stephanie L Wright; Darren Rowe; Richard C Thompson; Tamara S Galloway
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 9.  A critical analysis of the biological impacts of plasticizers on wildlife.

Authors:  Jörg Oehlmann; Ulrike Schulte-Oehlmann; Werner Kloas; Oana Jagnytsch; Ilka Lutz; Kresten O Kusk; Leah Wollenberger; Eduarda M Santos; Gregory C Paull; Katrien J W Van Look; Charles R Tyler
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  The deep sea is a major sink for microplastic debris.

Authors:  Lucy C Woodall; Anna Sanchez-Vidal; Miquel Canals; Gordon L J Paterson; Rachel Coppock; Victoria Sleight; Antonio Calafat; Alex D Rogers; Bhavani E Narayanaswamy; Richard C Thompson
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 2.963

View more
  11 in total

1.  Microplastics disrupt hermit crab shell selection.

Authors:  Andrew Crump; Charlotte Mullens; Emily J Bethell; Eoghan M Cunningham; Gareth Arnott
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 2.  Risks of Covid-19 face masks to wildlife: Present and future research needs.

Authors:  Ana L Patrício Silva; Joana C Prata; Catherine Mouneyrac; Damià Barcelò; Armando C Duarte; Teresa Rocha-Santos
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 7.963

3.  First Assessment of Plasticizers in Marine Coastal Litter-Feeder Fauna in the Mediterranean Sea.

Authors:  Sabrina Lo Brutto; Davide Iaciofano; Vincenzo Lo Turco; Angela Giorgia Potortì; Rossana Rando; Vincenzo Arizza; Vita Di Stefano
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2021-02-04

4.  Feeding type and development drive the ingestion of microplastics by freshwater invertebrates.

Authors:  Christian Scherer; Nicole Brennholt; Georg Reifferscheid; Martin Wagner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Biodegradable and Petroleum-Based Microplastics Do Not Differ in Their Ingestion and Excretion but in Their Biological Effects in a Freshwater Invertebrate Gammarus fossarum.

Authors:  Sandrine Straub; Philipp E Hirsch; Patricia Burkhardt-Holm
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Impact of polystyrene microplastics on Daphnia magna mortality and reproduction in relation to food availability.

Authors:  Rana Aljaibachi; Amanda Callaghan
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Effects of Nylon Microplastic on Feeding, Lipid Accumulation, and Moulting in a Coldwater Copepod.

Authors:  Matthew Cole; Rachel Coppock; Penelope K Lindeque; Dag Altin; Sarah Reed; David W Pond; Lisbet Sørensen; Tamara S Galloway; Andy M Booth
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 8.  Long-term durability and ecotoxicity of biocomposites in marine environments: a review.

Authors:  Marco Curto; Maelenn Le Gall; Ana Isabel Catarino; Zhiyue Niu; Peter Davies; Gert Everaert; Hom N Dhakal
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 4.036

Review 9.  Microplastics in waters and soils: Occurrence, analytical methods and ecotoxicological effects.

Authors:  Mengjie Wu; Chunping Yang; Cheng Du; Hongyu Liu
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 6.291

10.  Quality Criteria for Microplastic Effect Studies in the Context of Risk Assessment: A Critical Review.

Authors:  Vera N de Ruijter; Paula E Redondo-Hasselerharm; Todd Gouin; Albert A Koelmans
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 9.028

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.