Literature DB >> 27614558

Lead Extraction for Treatment of Cardiac Device Infection: A 20-Year Single Centre Experience.

Sean Gomes1, Gregory Cranney2, Michael Bennett3, Robert Giles2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Infection is one of the most feared complications of cardiac implantable electronic devices. We report microbiology, antimicrobial therapy and infection recurrence in patients with cardiac device infection (CDI) treated with transvenous lead extraction (TLE) at a single centre over a 20-year period.
METHODS: We identified a cohort of consecutive patients undergoing TLE for CDI by a single operator at a single high volume centre. Retrospective analysis of patient characteristics, microbiology, outcomes and infection recurrence was performed.
RESULTS: Between May 1992 to March 2012, 348 patients underwent extraction due to localised or systemic infection. Seven hundred and twenty leads were extracted from these patients. The mean follow-up was 5.5+/-4.9 years. Staphylococcal species accounted for 81% of CDI. A difference is seen in infection onset for device revision compared with initial implants [median 10 months vs 24 months, P=0.0001]. Duration of antibiotics therapy depended on the nature of the CDI (21 days post TLE for systemic vs. 10 days for localised infection, P < 0.0001). There was comparable mortality in the 37 (11.2%) patients who did not have a replacement device compared with a replacement (30% vs 29%, P=0.9). Retained lead fragments are a risk factor for CDI recurrence (20.8% recurrence in retained fragments vs 4.3% in complete removal, P=0.006).
CONCLUSION: Cardiac device infection can be successfully treated with a combination of TLE and antibiotic therapy. Device therapy can be safely withdrawn in some patients. Retained lead fragments are a risk factor for recurrent CDI following extraction.
Copyright © 2016 Australian and New Zealand Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons (ANZSCTS) and the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSANZ). All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Infection; Internal cardioverter-defibrillator; Lead extraction; Pacemaker

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27614558     DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2016.06.1217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Lung Circ        ISSN: 1443-9506            Impact factor:   2.975


  4 in total

1.  Risk factor analysis of device-related infections: value of re-sampling method on the real-world imbalanced dataset.

Authors:  Xiang-Fei Feng; Ling-Chao Yang; Li-Zhuang Tan; Yi-Gang Li
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 2.796

2.  Prognostic Value of Preoperative Echocardiographic Findings in Patients Undergoing Transvenous Lead Extraction.

Authors:  Dorota Nowosielecka; Wojciech Jacheć; Anna Polewczyk; Łukasz Tułecki; Andrzej Kleinrok; Andrzej Kutarski
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-14       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Percutaneous Lead Extraction in Infection of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Antônio da Silva Menezes Júnior; Thaís Rodrigues Magalhães; Alana de Oliveira Alarcão Morais
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018 Mar-Apr

4.  Transvenous Lead Extraction without Procedure-Related Deaths in 1000 Consecutive Patients: A Single-Center Experience.

Authors:  Paweł Stefańczyk; Dorota Nowosielecka; Łukasz Tułecki; Konrad Tomków; Anna Polewczyk; Wojciech Jacheć; Andrzej Kleinrok; Wojciech Borzęcki; Andrzej Kutarski
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2021-08-05
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.