| Literature DB >> 27613823 |
Niklas Klatt1, Katharina Scherschel1, Claudia Schad1, Denise Lau2, Aline Reitmeier1, Pawel Kuklik3, Kai Muellerleile4, Jin Yamamura5, Tanja Zeller2, Daniel Steven6, Stephan Baldus6, Benjamin Schäffer3, Christiane Jungen1, Christian Eickholt3, Katharina Wassilew7, Edzard Schwedhelm8, Stephan Willems1, Christian Meyer9.
Abstract
Hypertension is a major risk factor for many cardiovascular diseases and leads to subsequent concomitant pathologies such as left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). Translational approaches using large animals get more important as they allow the use of standard clinical procedures in an experimental setting. Therefore, the aim of this study was to establish a minimally invasive ovine hypertension model using chronic angiotensin II (ANG II) treatment and to characterize its effects on cardiac remodeling after 8 weeks. Sheep were implanted with osmotic minipumps filled with either vehicle control (n = 7) or ANG II (n = 9) for 8 weeks. Mean arterial blood pressure in the ANG II-treated group increased from 87.4 ± 5.3 to 111.8 ± 6.9 mmHg (P = 0.00013). Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging showed an increase in left ventricular mass from 112 ± 12.6 g to 131 ± 18.7 g after 7 weeks (P = 0.0017). This was confirmed by postmortem measurement of left ventricular wall thickness which was higher in ANG II-treated animals compared to the control group (18 ± 4 mm vs. 13 ± 2 mm, respectively, P = 0.002). However, ANG II-treated sheep did not reveal any signs of fibrosis or inflammatory infiltrates as defined by picrosirius red and H&E staining on myocardial full thickness paraffin sections of both atria and ventricles. Measurements of plasma high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and urinary 8-iso-prostaglandin F2α were inconspicuous in all animals. Furthermore, multielectrode surface mapping of the heart did not show any differences in epicardial conduction velocity and heterogeneity. These data demonstrate that chronic ANG II treatment using osmotic minipumps presents a reliable, minimally invasive approach to establish hypertension and nonfibrotic LVH in sheep.Entities:
Keywords: Angiotensin II; CMR; hypertension; left ventricular hypertrophy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27613823 PMCID: PMC5027340 DOI: 10.14814/phy2.12897
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Physiol Rep ISSN: 2051-817X
Figure 1Study protocol. Mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) was measured weekly throughout the experiment, starting 2 weeks before the implantation of osmotic minipumps (baseline). Cardiovascular magnetic resonance was performed in the same procedure as pump implantation and after 7 weeks of treatment (follow‐up). Two animals were implanted with cardiac rhythm monitoring devices. After 8 weeks, all animals were electrophysiologically characterized using epicardial multielectrode mapping.
Figure 2Development of mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) during follow‐up. MAP increases in animals after implantation of ANG II‐containing osmotic minipumps (n = 9), whereas no changes were detected in vehicle control (n = 7). Data are expressed as mean ± SD.
Basic parameters at baseline and follow‐up
| Control | 8‐week Ang II | 16‐week Ang II | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | Follow‐up | Baseline | Follow‐up | Baseline | Follow‐up | |
| Weight (kg) | 73.5 ± 5.4 | 75.1 ± 6.2 | 78.8 ± 4.5 | 77.8 ± 6.1 | 100.3 ± 2.8 | 99.4 ± 4.3 |
| Mean arterial blood pressure (mmHg) | 89.4 ± 3.7 | 90.5 ± 4.2 | 87.4 ± 5.3 | 111.8 ± 6.9 | 106.1 ± 2.2 | 142.3 ± 5.9 |
| Creatinine (mg/dL) | 1.0 ± 0.1 | 1.1 ± 0.2 | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 1.0 ± 0.3 | 1.1 ± 0.2 |
| Heart rate (min−1) | – | – | – | – | 71.5 ± 6.3 | 71.6 ± 1.3 |
| CRP (mg/dL) | <0.02 | <0.02 | <0.02 | <0.02 | <0.02 | <0.02 |
P = 0.00013 versus Ang II baseline; # P = 0.00001 versus control follow‐up; all values are mean ± standard deviation.
Figure 3Continuous ANG II treatment leads to development of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). (A) An exemplary short‐axis cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) demonstrates the development of LVH from baseline to 7 weeks of ANG II treatment, (B) upper panel: quantification of mean left ventricular (LV) mass via CMR of baseline versus follow‐up shows an increase of 18.3%. Lower panel: a not significant reduction in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was detectable between baseline and follow‐up. (C) Postmortem measurements of interventricular septum thickness showed an increase of 45.6% in the ANG II group compared to controls (upper panel). Mean LV wall thickness was increased by 55.1% between control and ANG II‐treated group (lower panel). Data are expressed as mean ± SD.
Functional and anatomical parameters determined by magnetic resonance imaging
| Control | 8‐week Ang II | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | Follow‐up | Baseline | Follow‐up | |
| Left ventricular mass (g) | 109.8 ± 19.9 | 109.6 ± 18.8 | 111.2 ± 12.6 | 131.5 ± 18.7 |
| Left ventricular ejection fraction (%) | 45.4 ± 8.8 | 49.6 ± 11.9 | 49.4 ± 10.4 | 42.9 ± 9.5 |
| Stroke volume (mL) | 55.6 ± 6.7 | 51.2 ± 15.51 | 51.8 ± 12.8 | 43.8 ± 7.7 |
P = 0.0017 versus baseline.
P = 0.092, n.s. versus baseline; all values are mean ± standard deviation.
Figure 4Continuous ANG II treatment does not lead to electrical remodeling after 8 weeks. (A) Representative activation maps from the left and right ventricle and atria with stimulation from multielectrode arrays (MEAs). (B) No change in conduction velocities between ANG II‐treated and control group are detectable (LA n = 4 ANG II vs. 4 control; RA n = 3 vs. 5; left ventricular n = 4 vs. 5, right‐ventricular n = 2 vs. 3). (C) Conduction heterogeneity index [(P95‐P5)/P50] of ANG II‐treated versus control group did not indicate any differences. (D) Layout of the flexible MEA with stimulation sites on the upper left and upper right corner. (E) Activation recovery interval of atrial and ventricular myocardium from multielectrode electrograms did not reveal differences between ANG II and control group. (F) Mean daily heart rate of two sheep implanted with cardiac rhythm monitoring devices for 16 weeks of ANG II treatment. A surgical repositioning of the device in sheep 2 after 4 weeks led to an artificial decrease in heart rate between weeks 4 and 8. No change in heart rate was detectable between the onset of treatment and during follow‐up.
Figure 5No structural remodeling is detectable after 8 weeks of ANG II treatment. (A) Representative microphotographs of picrosirius red‐stained paraffin sections of left ventricles. Variable amounts of interstitial fibrosis were detectable in the control as well as in the treated group. (B) Amount of cardiac fibrosis based on picrosirius red‐stained tissue sections was quantified using standardized semiautomatic image analysis software. No significant effects between the groups were detectable. (C) Representative H&E stainings of left ventricular samples. ANG II treatment did not lead to an increase in interstitial inflammatory cells. (D) Immunoblotting confirms that neither an accumulation of collagen nor of the leukocyte marker MPO or profibrotic growth factor TGF‐β was detectable between the groups. Additionally, no increase in phosphorylation of p38 and ERK was seen in immunoblotting. (E) Urine isoprostane levels were not significantly changed between baseline, 4 weeks, and follow‐up of ANG II‐treated animals indicating no increase in oxidative stress.