Literature DB >> 27613629

Comparative study of dioxin contamination from forest soil samples (BZE II) by mass spectrometry and EROD bioassay.

Florian Mertes1, John Mumbo2, Marchela Pandelova2, Silke Bernhöft2, Claudia Corsten2, Bernhard Henkelmann2, Bernd M Bussian3, Karl-Werner Schramm2,4.   

Abstract

Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds can be analyzed by bioanalytical screening methods to evaluate their biotoxicity. In vitro bioassays, based on 7-ethoxyresorufin-O-deethylase (EROD) and the activity of cytochrome P450 1A1 and the aryl hydrogen receptor (AhR) pathway, are employed for the evaluation of bioanalytical equivalents (BEQ) of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs), polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs), and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) from a wide variety of sample matrices. Here, we present the evaluation of 11 humic soil samples derived from forest stands across Germany and a comparison of the BEQ values against toxic equivalents (TEQ, PCDD/Fs+PCBs) derived by chemical analysis. BEQ values ranged from 8.8 to 34.1 while TEQ values from 13.9 to 60.5 pg/g dry weight. Additional two subsequent mineral layers were analyzed to identify the BEQ/TEQ gradient vertically, showing a TEQ decrease of 85.1 and 93.8 % from the humic to the first and second mineral layers, respectively. For BEQ values, a decrease as well as an increase was detected. BEQ measurements were performed with and without sample clean-up. Omitting clean-up revealed about 20 times increased BEQ values presumably due to non-persistent bioactive compounds not detected by chemical analysis. The results we present suggest that the EROD assay can be used for the screening of large sample quantities for the identification of samples showing dioxin and dioxin-like contaminations even at low levels, which can then be further analyzed by chemical analysis to identify the congener composition. The study also shows that EROD results give a qualitative image of the contamination. EROD seems to be interfered with cross-contaminants specifically for soils with high biological activity as forest layers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BEQ/TEQ; Bioanalytical screening; Bioassay; Dioxin; EROD; HRGC/HRMS; Persistent organic pollutants; Soil samples

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27613629     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-016-7558-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  19 in total

1.  Measuring TCDD equivalents in environmental samples with the micro-EROD assay: comparison with HRGC/HRMS data.

Authors:  W Li; W Z Wu; Y Xu; L Li; K W Schramm; A Kettrup
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.151

Review 2.  Bioanalytical screening methods for dioxins and dioxin-like compounds a review of bioassay/biomarker technology.

Authors:  P A Behnisch; K Hosoe; S Sakai
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 9.621

Review 3.  Chemically activated luciferase gene expression (CALUX) cell bioassay analysis for the estimation of dioxin-like activity: critical parameters of the CALUX procedure that impact assay results.

Authors:  Isabelle Windal; Michael S Denison; Linda S Birnbaum; Nathalie Van Wouwe; Willy Baeyens; Leo Goeyens
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Regionalized concentrations and fingerprints of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in German forest soils.

Authors:  Bernhard Aichner; Bernd M Bussian; Petra Lehnik-Habrink; Sebastian Hein
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 8.071

5.  Comparison of dioxin-like-response in vitro and chemical analysis of emissions and materials.

Authors:  K W Schramm; C Klimm; A Hofmaier; A Kettrup
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2001 Feb-Mar       Impact factor: 7.086

6.  H4IIE rat hepatoma cell bioassay-derived 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin equivalents in colonial fish-eating waterbird eggs from the Great Lakes.

Authors:  D E Tillitt; G T Ankley; D A Verbrugge; J P Giesy; J P Ludwig; T J Kubiak
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  Polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin and dibenzofuran concentration profiles in sediments and flood-plain soils of the Tittabawassee River, Michigan.

Authors:  Klara Hilscherova; Kurunthachalam Kannan; Haruhiko Nakata; Nobuyasu Hanari; Nobuyoshi Yamashita; Patrick W Bradley; John M McCabe; Allan B Taylor; John P Giesy
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2003-02-01       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Monitoring of dioxin-like, estrogenic and anti-androgenic activities in sediments of the Bizerta lagoon (Tunisia) by means of in vitro cell-based bioassays: contribution of low concentrations of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs).

Authors:  I Louiz; S Kinani; M-E Gouze; M Ben-Attia; D Menif; S Bouchonnet; J M Porcher; O K Ben-Hassine; S Aït-Aïssa
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 7.963

9.  Dose-Response Analysis Using R.

Authors:  Christian Ritz; Florent Baty; Jens C Streibig; Daniel Gerhard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Toxic equivalency factors (TEFs) for PCBs, PCDDs, PCDFs for humans and wildlife.

Authors:  M Van den Berg; L Birnbaum; A T Bosveld; B Brunström; P Cook; M Feeley; J P Giesy; A Hanberg; R Hasegawa; S W Kennedy; T Kubiak; J C Larsen; F X van Leeuwen; A K Liem; C Nolt; R E Peterson; L Poellinger; S Safe; D Schrenk; D Tillitt; M Tysklind; M Younes; F Waern; T Zacharewski
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  1 in total

1.  Editorial: Special Issue "Effect-related evaluation of anthropogenic trace substances-concepts for genotoxicity, neurotoxicity and endocrine effects".

Authors:  Tamara Grummt; Thomas-Benjamin Seiler; Thomas Braunbeck; Henner Hollert
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 4.223

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.