Literature DB >> 11757855

Bioanalytical screening methods for dioxins and dioxin-like compounds a review of bioassay/biomarker technology.

P A Behnisch1, K Hosoe, S Sakai.   

Abstract

Determination of environmental pollutants utilizing biodetectors such as bioassays, biomarkers, enzyme immunoassays (EIAs), or other bioanalytical tools is a continuously growing area. The present literature review describes the principles and advantages/limitations of several bioanalytical detection methods (BDMs) for the screening and diagnosis of dioxin and dioxin-like compounds. This study characterizes briefly the family of dioxin and dioxin-like compounds, discusses potential Ah receptor (AhR) ligands and cytochrome P-450 (CYP) 1A1-enzyme-inducing compounds. 'Milestones' in the development of BDMs are summarized and explained in detail for a number of bioanalytical tools that can be used to detect these classes of dioxin-like persistent bioaccumulative toxicants (PBTs). The design of a screening profile with a battery of bioassays/biomarkers coupled with the chemical analysis is evaluated. The relative potencies (REPs) to 2,3,7,8-TCDD for dioxin-like compounds are reviewed for various BDMs and the differences are noted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11757855     DOI: 10.1016/s0160-4120(01)00028-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Int        ISSN: 0160-4120            Impact factor:   9.621


  30 in total

1.  Analytical methods for PCBs and organochlorine pesticides in environmental monitoring and surveillance: a critical appraisal.

Authors:  Derek Muir; Ed Sverko
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 4.142

Review 2.  Saliva: diagnostics and therapeutic perspectives.

Authors:  N Spielmann; D T Wong
Journal:  Oral Dis       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 3.511

3.  Considerations for potency equivalent calculations in the Ah receptor-based CALUX bioassay: normalization of superinduction results for improved sample potency estimation.

Authors:  David S Baston; Michael S Denison
Journal:  Talanta       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 6.057

Review 4.  The 2005 World Health Organization reevaluation of human and Mammalian toxic equivalency factors for dioxins and dioxin-like compounds.

Authors:  Martin Van den Berg; Linda S Birnbaum; Michael Denison; Mike De Vito; William Farland; Mark Feeley; Heidelore Fiedler; Helen Hakansson; Annika Hanberg; Laurie Haws; Martin Rose; Stephen Safe; Dieter Schrenk; Chiharu Tohyama; Angelika Tritscher; Jouko Tuomisto; Mats Tysklind; Nigel Walker; Richard E Peterson
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  Compound- and mixture-specific differences in resistance to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and PCB-126 among Fundulus heteroclitus subpopulations throughout the Elizabeth River estuary (Virginia, USA).

Authors:  Bryan W Clark; Ellen M Cooper; Heather M Stapleton; Richard T Di Giulio
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Analysis of dioxins in contaminated soils with the calux and caflux bioassays, an immunoassay, and gas chromatography/high-resolution mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Malin Nording; Michael S Denison; David Baston; Ylva Persson; Erik Spinnel; Peter Haglund
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.742

7.  Exposure to environmental toxins in mothers of children with autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Sun Mi Kim; Doug Hyun Han; Hang Sik Lyoo; Kyung Joon Min; Kyung Ho Kim; Perry Renshaw
Journal:  Psychiatry Investig       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 2.505

8.  Characteristics and application of established luciferase hepatoma cell line that responds to dioxin-like chemicals.

Authors:  Zhi-Ren Zhang; Shun-Qing Xu; Xi Sun; Yong-Jun Xu; Xiao-Kun Cai; Zhi-Wei Liu; Xiang-Lin Tan; Yi-Kai Zhou; Jun-Yue Zhang; Hong Yan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Assessment of dioxin-like soil contamination in Mexico by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

Authors:  E García-Nieto; M Nichkova; L Yáñez; R Costilla-Salazar; A Torres-Dosal; S J Gee; B D Hammock; L Juárez-Santacruz; F Díaz-Barriga
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2009-11-29       Impact factor: 2.804

10.  Comparative study of dioxin contamination from forest soil samples (BZE II) by mass spectrometry and EROD bioassay.

Authors:  Florian Mertes; John Mumbo; Marchela Pandelova; Silke Bernhöft; Claudia Corsten; Bernhard Henkelmann; Bernd M Bussian; Karl-Werner Schramm
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-09-10       Impact factor: 4.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.