| Literature DB >> 27613109 |
Anushree Sanyal1,2, Guillaume Decocq3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Studies of the biogeographic distribution of seed oil content in plants are fundamental to understanding the mechanisms of adaptive evolution in plants as seed oil is the primary energy source needed for germination and establishment of plants. However, seed oil content as an adaptive trait in plants is poorly understood. Here, we examine the adaptive nature of seed oil content in 168 angiosperm families occurring in different biomes across the world. We also explore the role of multiple seed traits like seed oil content and composition in plant adaptation in a phylogenetic and nonphylogenetic context. RESULT: It was observed that the seed oil content in tropical plants (28.4 %) was significantly higher than the temperate plants (24.6 %). A significant relationship between oil content and latitude was observed in three families Papaveraceae, Sapindaceae and Sapotaceae indicating that selective forces correlated with latitude influence seed oil content. Evaluation of the response of seed oil content and composition to latitude and the correlation between seed oil content and composition showed that multiple seed traits, seed oil content and composition contribute towards plant adaptation. Investigation of the presence or absence of phylogenetic signals across 168 angiosperm families in 62 clades revealed that members of seven clades evolved to have high or low seed oil content independently as they did not share a common evolutionary path.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27613109 PMCID: PMC5017040 DOI: 10.1186/s12862-016-0752-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
Fig. 1a Seed oil content distribution in strictly temperate and tropical families (b) Seed oil content distribution in strictly temperate and strictly tropical species across all families (c) Seed oil content distribution in strictly temperate and tropical genera across all families
One-way ANOVA testing whether the tropical and temperate members of families that have both tropical and temperate species differ in seed oil content
| Contrast | Mean proportion of oil ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Family |
|
| Temperate | Tropical |
| Lauraceae | 0.172 | 0.68 | 44.77 (28) | 42.06 (14) |
| Liliaceae | 0.331 | 0.574 | 25.32(18) | 28.42(11) |
| Cyperaceae | 5.091 | 0.038* | 7.81 (17) | 20 (1) |
| Menispermaceae | 0.023 | 0.904 | 18.4 (1) | 24.25 (2) |
| Papaveraceae | 0.125 | 0.726 | 31.05 (37) | 34.7 (1) |
| Ranunculaceae | 1.235 | 0.269 | 25.02 (95) | 36.4 (1) |
| Proteaceae | 6.085 | 0.09 | 16.8 (4) | 65 (1) |
| Zygophyllaceae | 29.568 | 0.012* | 10.4 (3) | 35.25 (2) |
| Celastraceae | 0.426 | 0.528 | 42.9 (8) | 36.75 (4) |
| Eleocarpaceae | 24.884 | 0.015* | 2.9 (1) | 29.4 (4) |
| Euphorbiaceae | 1.094 | 0.298 | 33.59 (54) | 37.2 (43) |
| Linaceae | 1.193 | 0.355 | 30.25 (4) | 27 (1) |
| Fabaceae | 136.013 | 0.054 | 3.75 (2) | 29 (1) |
| Polygalaceae | 0.569 | 0.589 | 48.2 (1) | 21.75 (2) |
| Moraceae | 11.805 | 0.007* | 34.25 (4) | 14.77 (7) |
| Cucurbitaceae | 0.123 | 0.729 | 35.64 (9) | 37.865 (20) |
| Combretaceae | 1.588 | 0.236 | 1.95 (2) | 21.648 (10) |
| Myrtaceae | 0.091 | 0.792 | 14.4 (3) | 10 (1) |
| Onagraceae | 0.282 | 0.598 | 23.864 (40) | 20.4 (1) |
| Anacardiaceae | 0.512 | 0.482 | 32.34 (20) | 23.17 (3) |
| Rutaceae | 0.09 | 0.770 | 33.24 (8) | 31.27 (6) |
| Sapindaceae | 0.691 | 0.414 | 38.07 (11) | 31.75 (15) |
| Simourabaceae | 0.665 | 0.431 | 57.3 (1) | 39.19 (13) |
| Malvaceae | 1.933 | 0.170 | 15 (27) | 13.1 (28) |
| Caryophyllaceae | 3.220 | 0.085 | 5.38 (25) | 8 (1) |
| Capparaceae | 1.762 | 0.209 | 28.57 (7) | 20.93 (7) |
| Moringaceae | 2.110 | 0.197 | 54.3 (1) | 38.34 (7) |
| Santalaceae | 0.090 | 0.774 | 47.16 (7) | 54.3 (1) |
| Sapotaceae | 0.001 | 0.970 | 35.07 (3) | 34.59 (52) |
| Theaceae | 3.516 | 0.090 | 46.3 (7) | 33.12 (5) |
| Apocynaceae | 0.302 | 0.6 | 23.2 (1) | 39.25 (6) |
| Loganiaceae | 0.271 | 0.694 | 6 (1) | 24.5 (2) |
| Rubiaceae | 10.723 | 0.010* | 7.75 (8) | 28.27 (3) |
| Convolvulaceae | 4.915 | 0.051 | 6.78 (5) | 11.57 (7) |
| Solanaceae | 2.551 | 0.115 | 32 (47) | 29 (18) |
| Acanthaceae | 3.011 | 0.117 | 13.7 (7) | 29.08 (4) |
| Bignoniaceae | 2.287 | 0.169 | 26.8 (7) | 36.97 (3) |
| Pedaliaceae | 0.072 | 0.806 | 38.8 (3) | 37 (2) |
| Oleaceae | 0.52 | 0.503 | 15.58 (6) | 24.54 (1) |
| Scrophulariaceae | 1.264 | 0.266 | 30.4 (50) | 23.37 (3) |
| Verbenaceae | 1.129 | 0.313 | 11.19 (7) | 17.87 (5) |
| Boraginaceae | 1.604 | 0.208 | 19.87 (129) | 15.5 (4) |
*Significant at P < 0.05
One-way ANOVA testing whether the tropical and temperate members of genera that have both tropical and temperate species differ in seed oil content
| Contrast | Mean proportion of oil ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genus |
|
| Temperate | Tropical |
|
| 1.167 | 0.475 | 55.9 (2) | 46.73 (1) |
|
| 2.725 | 0.241 | 30 (1) | 55.2 (3) |
|
| 0.292 | 0.596 | 50.66 (15) | 54.43 (3) |
|
| 0.926 | 0.512 | 57 (1) | 42 (2) |
|
| 2.194 | 0.199 | 43.43 (3) | 57.93 (4) |
|
| 2.37 | 0.367 | 0.9 (2) | 1.7 (1) |
|
| 0.087 | 0.774 | 26.51 (7) | 28.43 (5) |
|
| 4.589 | 0.085 | 9.05 (6) | 20 (1) |
|
| 0.047 | 0.849 | 31.4 (3) | 34.7 (1) |
|
| 28.048 | 0.001* | 15.33 (8) | 36.4 (1) |
|
| 24.884 | 0.015* | 2.9 (1) | 29.03(4) |
|
| 1.355 | 0.364 | 36.57 (3) | 24 (1) |
|
| 1.459 | 0.314 | 14.9 (1) | 31.3 (4) |
|
| 0.888 | 0.352 | 33.96 (35) | 40 (2) |
|
| 4.593 | 0.278 | 52.8 (1) | 14.75 (2) |
|
| 1.193 | 0.355 | 30.25 (4) | 27 (1) |
|
| 0.187 | 0.681 | 31.2 (5) | 28.17 (3) |
|
| 0.490 | 0.523 | 2.10 (1) | 24.46 (5) |
|
| 0.257 | 0.616 | 23.2 (31) | 20.4 (1) |
|
| 2.155 | 0.381 | 39.45 (2) | 20 (1) |
|
| 2.959 | 0.161 | 15.75 (2) | 14.25 (4) |
|
| 0.003 | 0.956 | 13.1 (4) | 13.27(15) |
|
| 1.014 | 0.371 | 26.3 (5) | 27.2 (3) |
|
| 2.110 | 0.197 | 54.3 (1) | 38.3 (7) |
|
| 0.036 | 0.861 | 49.33 (4) | 54.3 (1) |
|
| 0.337 | 0.578 | 46.3 (7) | 43.2 (3) |
|
| 1.378 | 0.293 | 9.1 (2) | 12.3 (5) |
|
| 3.592 | 0.064 | 34.32 (33) | 32.27 (16) |
|
| 34.464 | 0.010* | 20.9 (3) | 13.5 (2) |
|
| 1.478 | 0.259 | 23.77 (9) | 29.4 (1) |
|
| 0.957 | 0.4 | 13.4 (4) | 19.6 (1) |
*Significant at P < 0.05
Direction, rate and significance of latitudinal changes in seed oil content in families with n > 30
| Family | Direction | Slope | Significance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anacardiaceae | 0.134 | 0.557 | |
| Boraginaceae | −0.056 | 0.166 | |
| Cucurbitaceae | 0.056 | 0.633 | |
| Cyperaceae | −0.054 | 0.171 | |
| Euphorbiaceae | −0.061 | 0.352 | |
| Lauraceae | 0.181 | 0.363 | |
| Malvaceae | 0.014 | 0.664 | |
| Meliaceae | −0.125 | 0.642 | |
| Onagraceae | 0.070 | 0.249 | |
| Papaveraceae | Decrease | −0.204 | 0.015* |
| Ranunculaceae | −0.008 | 0.876 | |
| Rosaceae | −0.013 | 0.913 | |
| Rutaceae | 0.122 | 0.474 | |
| Sapindaceae | Increase | 0.406 | 0.005* |
| Sapotaceae | Increase | 0.628 | 0.007* |
| Scrophulariaceae | 0.017 | 0.851 | |
| Solanaceae | −0.072 | 0.058 |
*Significant at P < 0.05
Fig. 2Regression of seed oil content on latitude in (a) Papaveraceae (b) Sapindaceae and (c) Sapotaceae
Phylogenetically constructed t-tests of independent strictly temperate and strictly tropical clades (see Fig. 3)
| Clades (temperate-tropical) | df |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Xanthorrhoeaceae-Arecaceae | 3 | 2.53 | 0.043* |
| Paeoniaceae-Calophyllaceae | 4 | 3.31 | 0.015* |
| Grossulariaceae-Chrysobalanceae | 20 | −6.79 | <0.0001* |
| Fagaceae-Vochysiaceae | 9 | 16.42 | <0.0001* |
| Nyssaceae-Opiliaceae | 1 | 8.39 | 0.04* |
| Betulaceae-Achariaceae | 2 | 0.9 | 0.23 |
| Saxifragaceae-Achariaceae | 1 | 0.79 | 0.29 |
| Daphniphyllaceae-Clusiaceae | 4 | 1.14 | 0.16 |
| Calycanthaceae-Hernandiaceae | 2 | 0.3 | 0.4 |
| Xanthorrhoeaceae-Orchidaceae | 1 | 0.61 | 0.33 |
| Lardizabalaceae-Arecaceae | 5 | −1.69 | 0.08 |
*Significant at P < 0.05
Fig. 3Seed oil content in 168 angiosperm families mapped onto the angiosperm phylogeny tree adapted from Stevens PF (2001 onwards)