Literature DB >> 27612842

Orbital implants: State-of-the-art review with emphasis on biomaterials and recent advances.

Francesco Baino1, Isabel Potestio2.   

Abstract

In the treatment of severe oculo-orbital traumas, intraocular malignancies or other life-threatening conditions it is sometimes necessary to surgically remove the patient's diseased eye. Following the removal of the eye, an orbital implant is inserted into the anophthalmic socket in order to provide satisfactory volume replacement and restore the aesthetic appearance of a normal eye. Over the last decades, the implant design and the criteria of materials selection evolved from simple non-porous polymeric sphere to devices with more complex shape and functionalities for ensuring better clinical outcomes in the long-term. Polymeric and ceramic porous implants have gained prominence since their highly interconnected porous architecture allows them to act as a passive framework for fibrovascular in-growth offering reduced complication rates and the possibility of pegging to enhance the motility of the artificial eye. However, there are still drawbacks to these materials. Some critical aspects of today's orbital implants include the risk of migration and extrusion, postoperative infections and low motility transmitted to the aesthetic ocular prosthesis. Hence, the development of novel biomaterials with enhanced functionalities (e.g. angiogenesis, antibacterial effect, in situ mouldability) which enable an improved outcome of eye replacement is more than ever desirable and represents one of the most challenging topics of research in the field of ocular implants. This review summarizes the evolution of orbital implants and provides an overview of the most recent advances in the field as well as some critical remarks for materials design, selection, characterization and translation to clinical applications.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioceramic; Coating; Composite; Ocular surgery; Polymer; Porous implant

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27612842     DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.08.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl        ISSN: 0928-4931            Impact factor:   7.328


  9 in total

Review 1.  Prosthetics in Facial Reconstruction.

Authors:  Jaclyn Klimczak; Samuel Helman; Sameep Kadakia; Raja Sawhney; Manoj Abraham; Allison K Vest; Yadranko Ducic
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2017-05-22

2.  Injectable silicone rubber for ocular implantation after evisceration.

Authors:  Peng Fei Zheng; Qi Sheng You; Qian Li; Hong Yan Deng; Ian Y H Wong; Xiao Yan Peng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Outcomes of secondary autologus dermo-fat orbital implants in anophthalmic sockets.

Authors:  Nausheen Hayat; Saad Jan; Natasha Atiq; Alyscia Cheema
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2021 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.088

Review 4.  The Evolution of Orbital Implants and Current Breakthroughs in Material Design, Selection, Characterization, and Clinical Use.

Authors:  Xiao-Yi Chen; Xue Yang; Xing-Li Fan
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-02-17

5.  Next-generation finely controlled graded porous antibacterial bioceramics for high-efficiency vascularization in orbital reconstruction.

Authors:  Jingyi Wang; Yiyu Peng; Menglu Chen; Xizhe Dai; Lixia Lou; Changjun Wang; Zhaonan Bao; Xianyan Yang; Zhongru Gou; Juan Ye
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2022-01-02

6.  Integrating pore architectures to evaluate vascularization efficacy in silicate-based bioceramic scaffolds.

Authors:  Fanghui Wu; Jun Yang; Xiurong Ke; Shuo Ye; Zhaonan Bao; Xianyan Yang; Cheng Zhong; Miaoda Shen; Sanzhong Xu; Lei Zhang; Zhongru Gou; Guojing Yang
Journal:  Regen Biomater       Date:  2021-12-16

7.  Copper-Doped Bioactive Glass/Poly (Ether-Ether-Ketone) Composite as an Orbital Enucleation Implant in a Rabbit Model: An In Vivo Study.

Authors:  Ke Xiong; Mengen Zhao; Zhaoying Wu; Wei Zhang; Chao Zhang
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 3.748

8.  Nanoscale Topographical Characterization of Orbital Implant Materials.

Authors:  Marco Salerno; Andrea Reverberi; Francesco Baino
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 3.623

9.  Production and Physicochemical Characterization of Cu-Doped Silicate Bioceramic Scaffolds.

Authors:  Francesco Baino; Isabel Potestio; Chiara Vitale-Brovarone
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 3.623

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.