Literature DB >> 27611772

Adverse Events at Baseline in a Chinese General Hospital: A Pilot Study of the Global Trigger Tool.

Xiao-Di Xu1, Yi-Jie Yuan1, Li-Ming Zhao1, Yang Li1, Hui-Zhen Zhang2, Hua Wu1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate adverse events (AEs) at baseline in a Chinese general hospital using the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) Global Trigger Tool (GTT) and discuss the feasibility of this tool to detect AEs in China.
METHODS: A total of 10 inpatient records from the hospital were sampled randomly half a month in 2014. The records were reviewed to identify AEs according to the second edition of the IHI GTT for measuring AEs. Triggers and AEs were analyzed using Microsoft Excel 2007. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS software, version 19.0.
RESULTS: A review of 240 patient records identified 51.0% (26/51) triggers in the worksheet, and 33.3% (17/51) were associated with AEs. A total of 70 AEs were identified in 54 patients, including 65.7% (46/70) category E AEs, which represent temporary harm requiring intervention, and 34.3% (24/70) category F AEs, which represent temporary harm requiring initial or prolonged hospitalization. The average rate of AEs per 1000 patient-days was 32.1 ± 20.9. The average rate of AEs per 100 admissions was 29.2 ± 16.1. The average rate of admissions with an AE was 22.5% ± 13.9%. The most significant characteristic of patients with AEs was longer hospital stay.
CONCLUSIONS: More than one fifth of adult inpatients in the current study experienced at least one AE resulting in temporary harm, most commonly caused by surgical operations and medication. With some modifications, the IHI GTT is a feasible and effective tool for detecting the overall status of AEs in a Chinese hospital.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 27611772     DOI: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000329

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Patient Saf        ISSN: 1549-8417            Impact factor:   2.844


  4 in total

1.  Assessing the development and implementation of the Global Trigger Tool method across a large health system in Sicily.

Authors:  Vincenzo Parrinello; Elena Grasso; Giuseppe Saglimbeni; Gabriella Patanè; Alma Scalia; Giuseppe Murolo; Peter Lachman
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2019-03-07

2.  A Risk-Factor Model for Antineoplastic Drug-Induced Serious Adverse Events in Cancer Inpatients: A Retrospective Study Based on the Global Trigger Tool and Machine Learning.

Authors:  Ni Zhang; Ling-Yun Pan; Wan-Yi Chen; Huan-Huan Ji; Gui-Qin Peng; Zong-Wei Tang; Hui-Lai Wang; Yun-Tao Jia; Jun Gong
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 5.988

3.  Variation in detected adverse events using trigger tools: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Luisa C Eggenschwiler; Anne W S Rutjes; Sarah N Musy; Dietmar Ausserhofer; Natascha M Nielen; René Schwendimann; Maria Unbeck; Michael Simon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  Applying the Global Trigger Tool in German Hospitals: A Pilot in Surgery and Neurosurgery.

Authors:  Mareen Brösterhaus; Antje Hammer; Steffen Kalina; Stefan Grau; Anjali A Roeth; Hany Ashmawy; Thomas Groß; Marcel Binnebösel; Wolfram Trudo Knoefel; Tanja Manser
Journal:  J Patient Saf       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 2.243

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.