| Literature DB >> 27608038 |
Yang Yang1, Xiao-Mei Hu2, Tian-Jiao Chen3, Ming-Jie Bai4.
Abstract
China is an urban and rural social model country. In the past three decades, the developing speed of rural areas has been much slower than urban areas, which may lead to the differences in dietary patterns. This study aimed to investigate the disparities of dietary structures from urban and rural children, and to analyze the effects of different dietary patterns on their adverse outcome. Among 1590 students, aged 11 years to 17 years, from primary and middle schools, a cross-sectional study was conducted. There were three dietary patterns recognized: Westernization structure, meat diet structure, and Western and Chinese structure. Compared with rural students, more urban students were in the highest categories of the whole dietary patterns (p < 0.001). Overweight/obesity and central adiposity were more prevailing among urban students, while rural students had a more prevailing risk of bone fracture (p < 0.05). Through the adjustment for all confounding factors, the Westernization structure could increase the risk of overweight/obesity and central adiposity, the meat structure could increase the risk of elevated blood pressure/hypertension, while the risk of low bone mineral quality could be reduced by the Chinese and Western structure. In conclusion, a rural-urban disparity in dietary patterns was found in our study, and different dietary patterns were associated with the risk of some adverse outcomes. Therefore, there were different prevalences of the adverse outcomes between rural and urban students.Entities:
Keywords: adolescent students; central adiposity; dietary pattern; overweight/obesity; risk of bone fracture; rural-urban disparity
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27608038 PMCID: PMC5037524 DOI: 10.3390/nu8090537
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Factor loadings for major dietary patterns.
| Food Groups | Dietary Patterns | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Chinese and Western | Westernization | Meat Diet | |
| Rice and Rice products | 0.317 | ||
| Flour and flour products (including big steamed buns, noodles, cake, etc.) | 0.338 | ||
| Whole grains (including corn, sorghum, oats, potato, etc.) | 0.359 | −0.009 | |
| Fresh vegetables | 0.388 | 0.239 | |
| Fresh fruit | 0.323 | ||
| Fat meat | 0.103 | ||
| Beef and mutton | 0.322 | 0.232 | |
| Poultry | 0.268 | ||
| Animal liver | 0.250 | 0.251 | |
| Eggs | 0.371 | 0.344 | |
| Freshwater fishes and shrimps, etc. | 0.156 | ||
| Deep-sea fish (including Ribbon fish, cod, sardines) | 0.177 | ||
| Milk and dairy products (including milk, yogurt, milk tablets, etc.) | 0.235 | 0.234 | |
| Beans and bean products | 0.220 | 0.398 | |
| Hamburgers and Fried foods | 0.276 | 0.297 | |
| Processed products (such as bacon, salted fish, pickle) | 0.246 | ||
| Nuts (such as walnut, peanut, etc.) | 0.302 | 0.211 | |
| Snacks (including cookies, chocolate, cakes, etc.) | 0.288 | ||
| Coke, Sprite | 0.196 | 0.220 | |
| Coffee | 0.371 | 0.258 | |
| Sugar (such as candy, sugar, brown sugar, etc.) | 0.314 | 0.289 | |
| Ice cream | 0.375 | 0.286 | |
| Instant noodles | 0.307 | 0.235 | |
| Barbecue | 0.293 | ||
| Percentage of variance explained | 26.352 | 22.217 | 17.126 |
The factor analysis with varimax rotation was used to recognize major dietary structures. Foods listed in the table were from the self-administered diet questionnaire. Values ≥ 0.40 were listed in the table in bold.
Rural-urban characteristics of the study participants.
| Participants | Characteristics | Rural (949) | Urban (641) | χ2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | Mean ± SD | 15.18 ± 1.27 | 14.98 ±1.16 | - | - |
| Sex | male | 448 (47.2%) | 318 (49.6%) | 0.884 | 0.347 |
| female | 501 (52.8%) | 323(50.4%) | - | - | |
| Place for meals | canteen | 548 (57.7%) | 101 (15.8%) | 507.891 | |
| eatery | 275 (29.0%) | 108 (16.8%) | - | - | |
| at home | 126 (13.3%) | 432 (67.4%) | - | - | |
| Economic status | Wealthy (The family’s per capita income > 3000) | 186 (19.6%) | 329 (51.3%) | 213.068 | |
| General (The family’s per capita income 500~3000) | 325(34.2%) | 202 (31.5%) | - | - | |
| poor (The family’s per capita income < 500) | 438 (46.2%) | 110(17.2%) | - | - | |
| Education of Father | Primary school or below | 216 (22.8%) | 46 (7.2%) | 229.139 | |
| Junior High school | 502 (52.9%) | 202 (31.5%) | - | - | |
| Senior High school or above | 231 (24.3%) | 393 (61.3%) | - | - | |
| Education of Mother | Primary school or below | 403(42.5%) | 162(25.3%) | 94.776 | |
| Junior High school | 382 (40.3%) | 238 (37.1%) | - | - | |
| Senior High school or above | 164(17.2%) | 241 (37.6%) | - | - | |
| Passive smoking | Yes | 509 (53.6%) | 338 (52.7%) | 0.126 | 0.723 |
| No | 440(46.4%) | 303 (47.3%) | - | - | |
| Strenuous exercise | <3 times/week | 493(51.9%) | 343 (53.5%) | 0.374 | 0.653 |
| >3 times/week | 456 (48.1%) | 298 (46.5%) | - | - | |
| Medium-intensity exercise | <3 times/week | 335 (35.3%) | 414 (64.6%) | 131.696 | |
| >3 times/week | 614 (64.7%) | 227 (35.4%) | - | - | |
| Low-intensity exercise | <3 times/week | 312 (32.9%) | 396(61.8%) | 129.380 | |
| >3 times/week | 637 (67.1%) | 245(38.2%) | - | - | |
| Nutritious supplements | Yes | 325 (34.2%) | 493 (76.9%) | 278.794 | |
| No | 624 (65.8%) | 148(23.1%) | - | - |
Chi-square test and associated p values are provided. Data were presented as mean ± SD, or number of cases (%).
Rural-urban differences of primary and middle school students across tertiles of major dietary pattern scores.
| Dietary Pattern | Rural | Urban | χ2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 949 | 641 | - | - | |
| Chinese and Western | - | - | 49.693 | 0.000 |
| T1 | 382 (40.3%) | 192(29.9%) | - | - |
| T2 | 325 (34.2%) | 178 (27.8%) | - | - |
| T3 | 242 (25.5%) | 271 (42.3%) | - | - |
| Westernization | - | - | 36.947 | 0.000 |
| T1 | 351 (37.0%) | 162 (25.3%) | - | - |
| T2 | 352 (37.1%) | 230 (35.9%) | - | - |
| T3 | 246 (25.9%) | 249 (38.8%) | - | - |
| Meat diet | - | - | 36.423 | 0.000 |
| T1 | 412 (43.4%) | 185 (28.9%) | - | - |
| T2 | 295 (31.1%) | 231 (36.0%) | - | - |
| T3 | 242 (25.5%) | 225 (35.1%) | - | - |
Chi-square test and associated p values were provided. T1 the lowest tertile of dietary pattern scores; T2 the intermediate tertile of dietary pattern scores; T3 the highest tertile of dietary pattern scores.
Differences of basic characteristics between urban and rural participants.
| Characteristics | Boys | Girls | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Urban | Rural | Urban | Rural | |||
| 498 | 349 | - | 451 | 292 | - | |
| Height (m) | 1.69 ± 0.58 | 1.67 ± 0.54 | 0.612 | 1.59 ± 0.51 | 1.57 ± 0.49 | 0.596 |
| Weight (kg) | 62.14 ± 9.21 | 60.22 ± 11.34 | <0.01 | 52.39 ± 5.03 | 51.41 ± 6.29 | <0.05 |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 72.12 ± 8.88 | 68.92 ± 7.69 | <0.01 | 66.54 ± 7.63 | 64.74 ± 6.86 | <0.01 |
| Hip circumference (cm) | 88.95 ± 7.49 | 85.52 ± 6.61 | <0.01 | 88.50 ± 8.15 | 86.08 ± 5.02 | <0.01 |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 116.71 ± 11.41 | 115.84 ± 11.07 | 0.269 | 108.89 ± 10.27 | 108.41 ± 9.12 | 0.516 |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 64.27 ± 8.50 | 65.03 ± 10.00 | 0.234 | 62.77 ± 7.02 | 63.02 ± 7.11 | 0.637 |
| Speed of sound (m/s) | 1561 ± 28.63 | 1531 ± 31.99 | <0.01 | 1541 ± 26.94 | 1529 ± 26.32 | <0.01 |
| Body mass index distribution (kg/m2) | - | - | <0.05 | - | - | <0.05 |
| wasting | 56 (11.2%) | 54 (15.5%) | - | 98 (21.7%) | 50 (17.1%) | - |
| normal weight | 304 (61.0%) | 222 (63.6%) | - | 235 (52.1%) | 179 (61.3%) | - |
| overweight/obesity | 138 (27.8%) | 73 (20.9%) | - | 118 (26.2%) | 63 (21.6%) | - |
| Central adiposity | - | - | <0.05 | - | - | <0.05 |
| Yes | 141 (28.3%) | 77 (22.1%) | - | 115 (25.5%) | 55 (18.8%) | - |
| No | 357 (71.7%) | 272 (77.9%) | - | 336 (74.5%) | 237 (81.2%) | - |
| Blood pressure distribution (mmHg) | - | - | 0.496 | - | - | 0.910 |
| normal blood pressure | 432 (86.7%) | 297 (85.1%) | - | 389 (86.3%) | 251 (86.0%) | - |
| elevated blood pressure/hypertension | 66 (13.3%) | 52 (14.9%) | - | 62 (13.7%) | 41 (14.0%) | - |
| Bone mineral quality distribution ( | - | - | <0.01 | - | - | <0.01 |
| Normal | 476 (95.6%) | 303 (86.8%) | - | 418 (92.7%) | 248 (84.9%) | - |
| Low bone quality | 22 (4.4%) | 46 (13.2%) | - | 33 (7.3%) | 44 (15.1%) | - |
Data were presented as mean ± SD, or number of cases (%). The associations between categorically demographic variables were assessed using χ2 analysis. T-test was used to compare continuous variables (mean ± SD).
Odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) for components of adverse outcome across tertiles of major dietary pattern scores.
| Dietary Patterns in Models | Overweight/Obesity | Central Adiposity | Elevated Blood Pressure/Hypertension | Low Bone Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR # (95% CI) | OR # (95% CI) | OR # (95% CI) | OR # (95% CI) | |
| Model 1 | ||||
| Westernization | ||||
| T2 | 1.484 (1.031–2.045) * | 2.587 (1.199–5.859) * | 1.085 (0.779–1.445) | 1.033(0.795–1.383) |
| T3 | 1.769 (1.153–2.736) * | 4.801 (1.848–12.307) * | 1.114 (0.825–1.674) | 0.955 (0.829–1.101) |
| Meat diet | ||||
| T2 | 1.238 (1.051–1.882) * | 1.218 (1.004–1.477) * | 1.318 (1.006–1.930) * | 0.972 (0.729–1.348) |
| T3 | 1.457 (1.001–2.143) * | 1.229 (1.043–2.903) * | 1.436 (1.139–1.810) * | 0.918 (0.684–1.233) |
| Chinese and Western | ||||
| T2 | 0.932 (0.650–1.337) | 0.907 (0.582–1.411) | 0.618 (0.253–0.932) * | 0.974 (0.269–3.520) |
| T3 | 0.894 (0.620–1.290) | 1.065 (0.716–1.584) | 0.479 (0.218–0.831) * | 1.097 (0.613–1.965) |
| Model 2 | ||||
| Westernization | ||||
| T2 | 1.386 (1.149–2.034) * | 2.785 (1.278–6.143) * | 0.913 (0.676–1.232) | 1.192 (0.855–1.663) |
| T3 | 1.769 (1.146–2.731) * | 5.191 (1.998–13.403) * | 0.778 (0.579–1.045) | 1.224 (1.030–1.771) * |
| Meat diet | - | - | - | |
| T2 | 1.154(0.752–1.771) | 1.566 (1.230–3.349) * | 1.421(1.098–1.876) * | 0.911 (0.620–0.255) |
| T3 | 1.232 (1.021-1.521) * | 1.775 (1.172–3.591) * | 1.678 (1.134–2.135) * | 0.920 (0.626–1.354) |
| Chinese and Western | ||||
| T2 | 0.952 (0.627–1.447) | 0.834 (0.693–0.998) * | 1.114 (0.773–1.606) | 0.621 (0.512–0.832) * |
| T3 | 1.073 (0.697–1.652) | 0.712(0.445–0.867) * | 0.956 (0.712–1.283) | 0.558 (0.414–0.901) * |
| Model 3 | ||||
| Westernization | ||||
| T2 | 1.370 (1.087–2.048) * | 2.391 (1.173–4.872) * | 1.078 (0.892–1.301) | 0.942 (0.736–1.207) |
| T3 | 1.925 (1.299–2.852) * | 5.511 (2.222–13.667) * | 1.179 (0.770–1.804) | 0.980 (0.788–1.217) |
| Meat diet | ||||
| T2 | 0.938 (0.745–1.180) | 0.964 (0.766–1.213) | 1.477 (1.087–2.006) * | 1.084 (0.893–1.315) |
| T3 | 1.113 (0.819–1.512) | 1.051 (0.892–1.331) | 1.576 (1.156–2.147) * | 1.068 (0.761–1.498) |
| Chinese and Western | ||||
| T2 | 0.961 (0.630–1.446) | 1.019 (0.844–1.229) | 0.983 (0.811–1.191) | 0.603 (0.453–0.898) * |
| T3 | 1.088 (0.702–1.684) | 0.990 (0.711–1.380) | 1.135 (0.776–1.648) | 0.421(0.289–0.559) * |
Multivariable logistic regression was applied to recognize the risk of overweight/obesity, central adiposity, abnormal blood pressure, and low bone quality for each main dietary structure. # OR is the odds ratio of T2 or T3 vs. T1, and T1 is regarded as reference group; * Significantly different from T1: * p < 0.05; T1: the lowest tertile of dietary pattern score; T2: the intermediate tertile of dietary pattern score; T3: the highest tertile of dietary pattern’s score; Model 1: unadjusted; Model 2: adjusted for sex, passive smoking, drinking, calcium supplements. SOS (speed of sound) was further adjusted for BMI (body mass index); Model 3: physical activity was further adjusted.