Literature DB >> 18442752

Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry interpretation and reporting in children and adolescents: the 2007 ISCD Pediatric Official Positions.

Catherine M Gordon1, Laura K Bachrach, Thomas O Carpenter, Nicola Crabtree, Ghada El-Hajj Fuleihan, Stepan Kutilek, Roman S Lorenc, Laura L Tosi, Katherine A Ward, Leanne M Ward, Heidi J Kalkwarf.   

Abstract

The International Society for Clinical Densitometry Official Positions on reporting of densitometry results in children represent an effort to consolidate opinions to assist healthcare providers determine which skeletal sites should be assessed, which adjustments should be made in these assessments, appropriate pediatric reference databases, and elements to include in a dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) report. Skeletal sites recommended for assessment are the lumbar spine and total body less head, the latter being valuable as it provides information on soft tissue, as well as bone. Interpretation of DXA findings in children with growth or maturational delay requires special consideration; adjustments are required to prevent erroneous interpretation. Normative databases used as a reference should be based on a large sample of healthy children that characterizes the variability in bone measures relative to gender, age, and race/ethnicity, and should be specific for each manufacturer and model of densitometer and software. Pediatric DXA reports should provide relevant demographic and health information, technical details of the scan, Z-scores, and should not include T-scores. The rationale and evidence for development of the Official Positions are provided. Given the sparse data currently available in many of these areas, it is likely that these positions will change over time as new data become available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18442752     DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2007.12.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Densitom        ISSN: 1094-6950            Impact factor:   2.617


  112 in total

1.  Efficacy and harms of nasal calcitonin in improving bone density in young patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial.

Authors:  Helen M Pappa; Tracee M Saslowsky; Rajna Filip-Dhima; Diane DiFabio; Hajar Hassani Lahsinoui; Apurva Akkad; Richard J Grand; Catherine M Gordon
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Pediatrics: Measuring pediatric BMD-the bar raised but the glass half full.

Authors:  Craig B Langman
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 43.330

3.  Bone and fat relationships in postadolescent black females: a pQCT study.

Authors:  N K Pollock; E M Laing; M W Hamrick; C A Baile; D B Hall; R D Lewis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Lower bone mass in prepubertal overweight children with prediabetes.

Authors:  Norman K Pollock; Paul J Bernard; Karl Wenger; Sudipta Misra; Barbara A Gower; Jerry D Allison; Haidong Zhu; Catherine L Davis
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 5.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis in children.

Authors:  Karen E Hansen; Brian Kleker; Nasia Safdar; Christie M Bartels
Journal:  Semin Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 5.532

6.  Prevalence of endocrine disorders and their associated factors in transfusion-dependent thalassemia patients: a historical cohort study in Southern Iran.

Authors:  M Bordbar; H Bozorgi; F Saki; S Haghpanah; M Karimi; A Bazrafshan; O R Zekavat
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 4.256

7.  Reference values for bone mineral density according to age with body size adjustment in Korean children and adolescents.

Authors:  Kyung Hee Yi; Jin Soon Hwang; Eun Young Kim; Jun Ah Lee; Dong Ho Kim; Jung Sub Lim
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2013-07-06       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  Bone microarchitecture is impaired in adolescent amenorrheic athletes compared with eumenorrheic athletes and nonathletic controls.

Authors:  Kathryn E Ackerman; Taraneh Nazem; Dorota Chapko; Melissa Russell; Nara Mendes; Alexander P Taylor; Mary L Bouxsein; Madhusmita Misra
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 9.  The Utility of DXA Assessment at the Forearm, Proximal Femur, and Lateral Distal Femur, and Vertebral Fracture Assessment in the Pediatric Population: 2019 ISCD Official Position.

Authors:  David R Weber; Alison Boyce; Catherine Gordon; Wolfgang Högler; Heidi H Kecskemethy; Madhusmita Misra; Diana Swolin-Eide; Peter Tebben; Leanne M Ward; Halley Wasserman; Christopher Shuhart; Babette S Zemel
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 2.617

10.  Hip bone strength indices in overweight and control adolescent boys.

Authors:  Zaher El Hage; Denis Theunynck; Christophe Jacob; Elie Moussa; Rafic Baddoura; Pierre Kamlé; Rawad El Hage
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 2.626

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.