| Literature DB >> 27607076 |
Qingzhen Yang1,2, Feng Wang2, Jingping Rao1.
Abstract
We investigated the effects of different concentrations (0, 1, 2 and 4 mM) of putrescine on chilling injury, fruit quality, ethylene production rate, fatty acid composition and the antioxidant system of cold-stored kiwifruit (Actinidia chinensis Planch. var. chinensis 'Hongyang'). We achieved a significant decrease in ethylene production, maintained fruit quality and alleviated chilling injury during storage via treatment with 2 mM putrescine. Furthermore, putrescine treatment inhibited increases in superoxide anion production rate and H2O2 concentration, while maintaining higher membrane lipid unsaturation as well as increased activities of superoxide dismutase and catalase. In addition, putrescine treatment enhanced the activities of antioxidant enzymes related to the ascorbate-glutathione cycle while causing higher levels of ascorbic acid and reduced glutathione. Our results suggest that induced tolerance against chilling injury via putrescine treatment in cold-stored kiwifruit may be due to enhanced antioxidant activity, increased unsaturation of membrane lipids, and inhibited ethylene production.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27607076 PMCID: PMC5015990 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162159
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Chilling injury symptoms of ‘Hongyang’ kiwifruit.
Representative pictures of ‘Hongyang’ kiwifruit after 90 days of cold storage followed by 5 days of shelf life at 20°C. (A) normal kiwifruit. (B) skin showing the brown symptom of CI (arrow). (C) normal flesh of kiwifruit. (D) flesh of kiwifruit showing the grainy symptom (arrow). (E) the cross-section of the normal flesh. (F) the cross-section of the flesh showing the grainy symptom (arrow). (G)the longitudinal section of the normal flesh. (H) the longitudinal section of the flesh showing the grainy symptom (arrow).
Fig 2Effects of exogenous Put treatment on chilling injury index (A) and chilling injury incidence (B) of ‘Hongyang’ fruit. Kiwifruit were respectively immersed in 0 mM (control), 1 mM, 2 mM and 4 mM putrescine (Put) for 10 min, and then storage at 0°C followed with another 5 days shelf life at 20°C. Chilling injury incidence was assessed at day 90. Vertical bars represent standard error of means (n = 3). Different letters show significant differences between means (P <0.05).
Effects of exogenous Put treatment on firmness, SSC, and titratable acidity of ‘Hongyang’ kiwifruit during storage at 0°C.
| Treatment | Storage time (day) | Firmness (N) | SSC (%) | Titratable acidity (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 116 ± 1.341 aA | 7.0 ± 0.074 aC | 1.35 ± 0.153 aA | |
| Control | 90 | 23 ± 0.725 cB | 15.0 ± 0.178 aA | 1.06 ± 0.010 cAB |
| 1 mM Put | 29 ± 0.208 bB | 14.1 ± 0.171 bB | 1.13 ± 0.011 bA | |
| 2 mM Put | 34 ± 0.416 aB | 12.4 ± 0.107 cB | 1.23 ± 0.025 aA | |
| 4 mM Put | 30 ± 1.617 bB | 11.8 ± 0.077 cB | 1.09 ± 0.013 cAB | |
| Control | 90+5 | 15 ± 0.992 cC | 15.1 ± 0.110 aA | 0.76 ± 0.031 cB |
| 1 mM Put | 22 ± 0.418 bC | 15.1 ± 0.061 aA | 0.94 ± 0.012 bA | |
| 2 mM Put | 26 ± 1.077 aC | 14.4 ± 0.196 bA | 1.11 ± 0.027 aA | |
| 4 mM Put | 22 ± 0.757 bC | 13.3 ± 0.072 cA | 0.95 ± 0.010 bB |
Kiwifruit were respectively immersed in 0 mM (control), 1 mM, 2 mM and 4 mM putrescine (Put) for 10 min. The storage time is expressed as days of 0°C storage. In storage time, ‘+5’ denotes 5 days of shelf life at 20°C following storage at 0°C. SSC is expressed as soluble solid concentration. Data are shown as the mean ± S.E. Values in the same column with different letters for each day are significantly different at P <0.05. Lowercase letters represent significant difference among treatment factors, and capital letters represent significant difference among storage time factors.
Fig 3Effect of exogenous Put treatment on ethylene production rate of ‘Hongyang’ fruit.
Kiwifruit were respectively immersed in 0 mM (control) and 2 mM putrescine (Put) for 10 min and then storage at 0°C and 90–95% relative humidity for 90 days. In storage time ‘+5’ denotes 5 days of shelf life at 20°C following storage at 0°C. Vertical bars represent standard error of means (n = 3). Asterisks show significant difference (P <0.05) for the samples between 2 mM Put treatment and control taken at the same time point.
Fig 4Effects of exogenous Put treatment on palmitic acid (A), stearic acid (B), Oleic acid (C), linoleic acid (D), linolenic acid concentration (E) and the ratio of unsaturated to saturated fatty acids (F) of ‘Hongyang’ fruit. Kiwifruit were respectively immersed in 0 mM (control) and 2 mM putrescine (Put) for 10 min and then storage at 0°C and 90–95% relative humidity for 90 days. The ratio of unsaturated to saturated fatty acids denote (oleic acid + linoleic acid + linolenic acid)/ (palmitic acid + stearic acid). Vertical bars represent standard error of means (n = 3). Asterisks show significant difference (P <0.05) for the samples between 2 mM Put treatment and control taken at the same time point.
Fig 5Effects of exogenous Put treatment on superoxide anion production rate (A) and H Kiwifruit were respectively immersed in 0 mM (control) and 2 mM putrescine (Put) for 10 min and then storage at 0°C and 90–95% relative humidity for 90 days. Vertical bars represent standard error of means (n = 3). Asterisks show significant difference (P <0.05) for the samples between 2 mM Put treatment and control taken at the same time point.
Fig 6Effects of exogenous Put treatment on superoxide dismutase (A) and catalase (B) activity of ‘Hongyang’ fruit. Kiwifruit were respectively immersed in 0 mM (control) and 2 mM putrescine (Put) for 10 min and then storage at 0°C and 90–95% relative humidity for 90 days. Vertical bars represent standard error of means (n = 3). Asterisks show significant difference (P <0.05) for the samples between 2 mM Put treatment and control taken at the same time point.
Fig 7Effects of exogenous Put treatment on ascorbate peroxidase (A), glutathion reductase (B), monodehydroascorbate reductase (C) and dehydroascorbate reductase (D) activity of ‘Hongyang’ fruit. Kiwifruit were respectively immersed in 0 mM (control) and 2 mM putrescine (Put) for 10 min and then storage at 0°C and 90–95% relative humidity for 90 days. Vertical bars represent standard error of means (n = 3). Asterisks show significant difference (P <0.05) for the samples between 2 mM Put treatment and control taken at the same time point.
Fig 8Effects of exogenous Put treatment on ascorbate acid (A) dehydroascorbic acid (B), reduced glutathione (C), and oxidized glutathione (D) concentration of ‘Hongyang’ fruit. Kiwifruit were respectively immersed in 0 mM (control) and 2 mM putrescine (Put) for 10 min and then storage at 0°C and 90–95% relative humidity for 90 days. Vertical bars represent standard error of means (n = 3). Asterisks show significant difference (P <0.05) for the samples between 2 mM Put treatment and control taken at the same time point.
The principal components analysis in kiwifruit (latent value and cumulative contribution).
| Principal components | Latent value | Accumulative latent value | Contribution rate /% | Accumulative contribution rate /% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12.778 | 12.778 | 63.892 | 63.892 |
| 2 | 3.528 | 3.528 | 17.641 | 81.533 |
| 3 | 1.614 | 1.614 | 8.072 | 89.605 |
| 4 | 1.229 | 1.229 | 6.146 | 95.751 |
Twenty physical signs of kiwifruit were analyzed by the principal components analysis. These physical signs are oleic acid concentration, linoleic acid concentration, linolenic acid concentration, stearic acid concentration, palmitic acid concentration, (oleic acid + linoleic acid + linolenic acid)/ (palmitic acid + stearic acid), H2O2 concentration, O2·— concentration, superoxide dismutase activity, catalase activity, ascorbate peroxidase activity, glutathione reductase activity, monodehydroascorbate reductase activity, dehydroascorbate reductase activity, dehydroascorbic acid concentration, ascorbic acid concentration, glutathione concentration concentration, oxidized glutathione concentration, C2H4 production rate and chilling injury index.
Loading of principal components.
| CI | palmitic | stearic | oleic | linoleic | linolenic | Ratio | O2·— | H2O2 | SOD | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Principal components | 1 | 0.898 | 0.955 | 0.97 | 0.693 | -0.938 | -0.901 | -0.971 | 0.934 | 0.991 | 0.462 |
| 2 | -0.121 | 0.104 | 0.036 | -0.272 | -0.144 | 0.105 | -0.132 | 0.128 | 0.065 | 0.733 | |
| 3 | 0.365 | 0.212 | -0.143 | 0.522 | -0.164 | -0.326 | -0.117 | -0.293 | -0.067 | -0.114 | |
| CAT | GR | MDHAR | DHAR | APX | DHA | GSH | GSSG | AsA | C2H4 | ||
| Principal components | 1 | -0.306 | -0.642 | 0.979 | -0.806 | -0.461 | 0.812 | -0.857 | 0.668 | -0.596 | 0.644 |
| 2 | 0.761 | 0.602 | -0.061 | 0.362 | 0.818 | 0.5 | 0.374 | 0.311 | -0.757 | 0.116 | |
| 3 | -0.129 | 0.401 | -0.072 | 0.241 | 0.027 | 0.207 | 0.193 | 0.181 | 0.152 | -0.718 | |
Loadings were calculated by the principal components analysis. Palmitic, stearic, oleic, linoleic, linolenic and ratio represent palmitic acid concentration, stearic acid concentration, oleic acid concentration, linoleic acid concentration, linolenic acid concentration and (oleic acid + linoleic acid + linolenic acid)/ (palmitic acid + stearic acid), respectively. SOD, CAT, GR, MDHAR, DHAR, APX, DHA, GSH, GSSG and AsA denote superoxide dismutase activity, catalase activity, glutathione reductase activity, monodehydroascorbate reductase activity, dehydroascorbate reductase activity, ascorbate peroxidase activity, dehydroascorbic acid concentration, glutathione concentration, oxidized glutathione concentration and ascorbic acid concentration, respectively.