Literature DB >> 27606607

Does objectively measured daily duration of forward bending predict development and aggravation of low-back pain? A prospective study.

Julie Lagersted-Olsen1, Birthe Lykke Thomsen, Andreas Holtermann, Karen Søgaard, Marie Birk Jørgensen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this paper was to investigate if objectively measured daily duration of forward bending of the trunk increases the risk of the development or aggravation of low-back pain (LBP) over one year in a working blue-collar population by examining (i) the incidence rate of LBP among workers reporting no LBP at baseline, and (ii) the aggravation of LBP among workers reporting LBP at baseline.
METHODS: Using data from the Danish Physical Activity Cohort with Objective Measurements (DPhacto), the study measured forward bending of the trunk (>60˚) at work (FBW) and during leisure time (FBL), diurnally with accelerometers, and LBP with one-year monthly self-reports among 682 blue-collar workers from 15 workplaces. The development of LBP was investigated with Cox's proportional hazards model (N=200), and the aggravation of LBP was investigated with mixed model for repeated measurements (N=482).
RESULTS: Workers with no LBP at baseline had a FBW median of 7.9 minutes/day. Workers with LBP at baseline had a FBW median of 7.3 minutes/day. No significant associations were found between daily duration of forward bending of the trunk and development or aggravation of LBP. Similar results were found in the secondary analyses, in which FBL, different degrees of forward bending (>30˚ and >90˚), and varying follow-up time since measurement were considered.
CONCLUSION: Using objective measurements of forward bending and monthly follow-up of LBP over one year, this study did not confirm the hypothesis of a positive association between daily duration of forward bending and LBP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27606607     DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.3591

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health        ISSN: 0355-3140            Impact factor:   5.024


  11 in total

1.  Biomechanical factors during common agricultural activities: Results of on-farm exposure assessments using direct measurement methods.

Authors:  Nathan B Fethke; Mark C Schall; Howard Chen; Cassidy A Branch; Linda A Merlino
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 2.155

2.  Changes in physiotherapy students' beliefs and attitudes about low back pain through pre-registration training.

Authors:  Guillaume Christe; Ben Darlow; Claude Pichonnaz
Journal:  Arch Physiother       Date:  2021-05-17

3.  Trunk kinematics and low back pain during pruning among vineyard workers-A field study at the Chateau Larose-Trintaudon.

Authors:  Romain Balaguier; Pascal Madeleine; Kévin Rose-Dulcina; Nicolas Vuillerme
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Effects of a Participatory Ergonomics Intervention With Wearable Technical Measurements of Physical Workload in the Construction Industry: Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Mikkel Brandt; Pascal Madeleine; Afshin Samani; Jeppe Zn Ajslev; Markus D Jakobsen; Emil Sundstrup; Lars L Andersen
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 5.428

5.  Is high aerobic workload at work associated with leisure time physical activity and sedentary behaviour among blue-collar workers? A compositional data analysis based on accelerometer data.

Authors:  Charlotte Lund Rasmussen; Javier Palarea-Albaladejo; Mette Korshøj; Nidhi Gupta; Kirsten Nabe-Nielsen; Andreas Holtermann; Marie Birk Jørgensen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Implementing sensor technology applications for workplace health promotion: a needs assessment among workers with physically demanding work.

Authors:  Sander Mathijn Spook; Wendy Koolhaas; Ute Bültmann; Sandra Brouwer
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Associations of objectively measured forward bending at work with low-back pain intensity: a 2-year follow-up of construction and healthcare workers.

Authors:  Lars-Kristian Lunde; Markus Koch; Suzanne Lerato Merkus; Stein Knardahl; Morten Wærsted; Kaj Bo Veiersted
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 8.  Thigh-worn accelerometry for measuring movement and posture across the 24-hour cycle: a scoping review and expert statement.

Authors:  Matthew L Stevens; Nidhi Gupta; Elif Inan Eroglu; Patrick Joseph Crowley; Barbaros Eroglu; Adrian Bauman; Malcolm Granat; Leon Straker; Peter Palm; Sari Stenholm; Mette Aadahl; Paul Mork; Sebastien Chastin; Vegar Rangul; Mark Hamer; Annemarie Koster; Andreas Holtermann; Emmanuel Stamatakis
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2020-12-24

9.  Method for measuring tri-axial lumbar motion angles using wearable sheet stretch sensors.

Authors:  Akio Yamamoto; Hiroyuki Nakamoto; Tokiya Yamaji; Hideo Ootaka; Yusuke Bessho; Ryo Nakamura; Rei Ono
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Light-intensity physical activity derived from count or activity types is differently associated with adiposity markers.

Authors:  Charlotte Lund Rasmussen; Melker Staffan Johansson; Patrick Crowley; Peter Fjeldstad Hendriksen; Jørgen Skotte; Nidhi Gupta; Andreas Holtermann
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2020-07-05       Impact factor: 4.221

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.