Literature DB >> 27606221

Does Hearing About Cancer Influence Stimulus Control? An Exploratory Study of Verbal Modulation of Stimulus Generalization.

Thomas S Critchfield1, Derek D Reed2.   

Abstract

Participants first became familiar with an image showing moderate symptoms of the skin cancer melanoma. In a generalization test, they indicated whether images showing more and less pronounced symptoms were "like the original." Some groups (cancer context) were told that the images depicted melanoma and that the disease is deadly unless detected early. Control groups were not told what the images depicted. For control groups, generalization gradients were fairly typical of what is normally reported in the generalization literature, but for cancer context groups, gradients were shifted such that highly symptomatic moles were identified as "like the original" more than normal and subtly symptomatic ones were endorsed less than normal. These results may have implications for melanoma education efforts and, more generally, illustrate the possible importance of studying interactions between verbal behavior and primary stimulus control.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; Melanoma; Stimulus generalization; Verbal modulation

Year:  2016        PMID: 27606221      PMCID: PMC4883557          DOI: 10.1007/s40616-016-0055-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Verbal Behav        ISSN: 0889-9401


  20 in total

1.  Understanding complex behavior: the transformation of stimulus functions.

Authors:  S Dymond; R A Rehfeldt
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2000

Review 2.  Translational research in behavior analysis: historical traditions and imperative for the future.

Authors:  F Charles Mace; Thomas S Critchfield
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  The legacy of Guttman and Kalish (1956): Twenty-five years of research on stimulus generalization.

Authors:  W K Honig; P J Urcuioli
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  A transfer of functions through derived arbitrary and nonarbitrary stimulus relations.

Authors:  D Barnes; M Keenan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Instructional control of generalized relational matching to sample in children.

Authors:  B Lowenkron
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions, and behavior.

Authors:  B E Meyerowitz; S Chaiken
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1987-03

7.  Cancer by another name: a randomized trial of the effects of euphemism and uncertainty in communicating with cancer patients.

Authors:  S M Dunn; P U Patterson; P N Butow; H H Smartt; W H McCarthy; M H Tattersall
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Fear generalization in humans: impact of verbal instructions.

Authors:  Bram Vervliet; Merel Kindt; Debora Vansteenwegen; Dirk Hermans
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2009-09-11

Review 9.  Visual images for patient skin self-examination and melanoma detection: a systematic review of published studies.

Authors:  Jennifer E McWhirter; Laurie Hoffman-Goetz
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 11.527

10.  Early detection of malignant melanoma: the role of physician examination and self-examination of the skin.

Authors:  R J Friedman; D S Rigel; A W Kopf
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1985 May-Jun       Impact factor: 508.702

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.