Lluís Campins1, Mateu Serra-Prat2,3, Inés Gózalo1, David López1, Elisabet Palomera4, Clara Agustí1, Mateu Cabré5. 1. Pharmacy Department. Hospital of Mataró, Consorci Sanitari del Maresme, Mataró, Barcelona, Spain. 2. Research Unit, Consorci Sanitari del Maresme, Mataró, Barcelona, Spain, mserra@csdm.cat. 3. Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), ISCIII, Spain and. 4. Research Unit, Consorci Sanitari del Maresme, Mataró, Barcelona, Spain. 5. Internal Medicine Department, Hospital of Mataró, Consorci Sanitari del Maresme, Mataró, Barcelona, Spain.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Polypharmacy is frequent in the elderly population and is associated with potentially drug inappropriateness and drug-related problems. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness and safety of a medication evaluation programme for community-dwelling polymedicated elderly people. DESIGN: Randomized, open-label, multicentre, parallel-arm clinical trial with 1-year follow-up. SETTING: Primary care centres. PARTICIPANTS: Polymedicated (≥8 drugs) elderly people (≥70 years). STUDY INTERVENTION: Pharmacist review of all medication according to the Good Palliative-Geriatric Practice algorithm and the Screening Tool of Older Person's Prescriptions-Screening Tool to Alert Doctors to the Right Treatment criteria and recommendations to the patient's physician. CONTROL INTERVENTION: Routine clinical practice. MEASUREMENTS: Recommendations and changes implemented, number of prescribed drugs, restarted drugs, primary care and emergency department consultations, hospitalizations and death. RESULTS:About 503 (252 intervention and 251 control) patients were recruited and 2709 drugs were evaluated. About 26.5% of prescriptions were rated as potentially inappropriate and 21.5% were changed (9.1% discontinuation, 6.9% dose adjustment, 3.2% substitution and 2.2% new prescription). About 2.62 recommendations per patient were made and at least one recommendation was made for 95.6% of patients. The mean number of prescriptions per patient was significantly lower in the intervention group at 3- and 6-month follow-up. Discontinuations, dose adjustments and substitutions were significantly higher than in the control group at 3, 6 and 12 months. No differences were observed in the number of emergency visits, hospitalizations and deaths. CONCLUSION: The study intervention was safe, reduced potentially inappropriate medication, but did not reduce emergency visits and hospitalizations in polymedicated elderly people.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Polypharmacy is frequent in the elderly population and is associated with potentially drug inappropriateness and drug-related problems. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness and safety of a medication evaluation programme for community-dwelling polymedicated elderly people. DESIGN: Randomized, open-label, multicentre, parallel-arm clinical trial with 1-year follow-up. SETTING: Primary care centres. PARTICIPANTS: Polymedicated (≥8 drugs) elderly people (≥70 years). STUDY INTERVENTION: Pharmacist review of all medication according to the Good Palliative-Geriatric Practice algorithm and the Screening Tool of Older Person's Prescriptions-Screening Tool to Alert Doctors to the Right Treatment criteria and recommendations to the patient's physician. CONTROL INTERVENTION: Routine clinical practice. MEASUREMENTS: Recommendations and changes implemented, number of prescribed drugs, restarted drugs, primary care and emergency department consultations, hospitalizations and death. RESULTS: About 503 (252 intervention and 251 control) patients were recruited and 2709 drugs were evaluated. About 26.5% of prescriptions were rated as potentially inappropriate and 21.5% were changed (9.1% discontinuation, 6.9% dose adjustment, 3.2% substitution and 2.2% new prescription). About 2.62 recommendations per patient were made and at least one recommendation was made for 95.6% of patients. The mean number of prescriptions per patient was significantly lower in the intervention group at 3- and 6-month follow-up. Discontinuations, dose adjustments and substitutions were significantly higher than in the control group at 3, 6 and 12 months. No differences were observed in the number of emergency visits, hospitalizations and deaths. CONCLUSION: The study intervention was safe, reduced potentially inappropriate medication, but did not reduce emergency visits and hospitalizations in polymedicated elderly people.
Authors: Andrew D Baumgartner; Collin M Clark; Susan A LaValley; Scott V Monte; Robert G Wahler; Ranjit Singh Journal: J Clin Pharm Ther Date: 2019-12-24 Impact factor: 2.512
Authors: E Delgado-Silveira; M Vélez-Díaz-Pallarés; M Muñoz-García; A Correa-Pérez; A M Álvarez-Díaz; A J Cruz-Jentoft Journal: Eur Geriatr Med Date: 2021-05-07 Impact factor: 1.710
Authors: Joanne Reeve; Michelle Maden; Ruaraidh Hill; Amadea Turk; Kamal Mahtani; Geoff Wong; Dan Lasserson; Janet Krska; Dee Mangin; Richard Byng; Emma Wallace; Ed Ranson Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2022-07 Impact factor: 4.106
Authors: Ivy O Poon; Felicia Skelton; Lena R Bean; Dominique Guinn; Terica L Jemerson; Ngozi D Mbue; Creaque V Charles; Uche Anadu Ndefo Journal: J Patient Cent Res Rev Date: 2021-04-19