Ashley N Walus1, Donna M M Woloschuk2. 1. , BScPharm, ACPR, is a Clinical Resource Pharmacist -Educational Services with the Winnipeg Regional Health Authority Pharmacy Program, Winnipeg, Manitoba. 2. , BSP, PharmD, MEd(Distance), FCSHP, was, at the time of this project, the Regional Pharmacy Manager - Educational Services, Winnipeg Regional Health Authority, Winnipeg, Manitoba. She is now a Pharmacy Consultant in Calgary, Alberta.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Historically, pharmacists have not been included on home care teams, despite the fact that home care patients frequently experience medication errors. Literature describing Canadian models of pharmacy practice in home care settings is limited. The optimal service delivery model and distribution of clinical activities for home care pharmacists remain unclear. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to describe the impact of a pharmacist based at a community home care office and providing home visits, group education, and telephone consultations. The secondary objective was to determine the utility of acute care clinical pharmacy key performance indicators (cpKPIs) in guiding home care pharmacy services, in the absence of validated cpKPIs for ambulatory care. METHODS: The Winnipeg Regional Health Authority hired a pharmacist to develop and implement the pilot program from May 2015 to July 2016. A referral form, consisting of consultation criteria used in primary care practices, was developed. The pharmacist also reviewed all patient intakes and all patients waiting in acute care facilities for initiation of home care services, with the goal of addressing issues before admission to the Home Care Program. A password-protected database was built for data collection and analysis, and the data are presented in aggregate. RESULTS: A total of 197 referrals, involving 184 patients, were received during the pilot program; of these, 62 were excluded from analysis. The majority of referrals (95 [70.4%]) were for targeted medication reviews, and 271 drug therapy problems were identified. Acceptance rates for the pharmacist's recommendations were 90.2% (74 of 82 recommendations) among home care staff and 47.0% (55 of 117 recommendations) among prescribers and patients. On average, 1.5 cpKPIs were identified for each referral. CONCLUSIONS: The pilot program demonstrated a need for enhanced access to clinical pharmacy services for home care patients, although the best model of service provision remains unclear. More research is warranted to determine the optimal pharmacy service for home care patients and the most appropriate cpKPIs to measure its effects.
BACKGROUND: Historically, pharmacists have not been included on home care teams, despite the fact that home care patients frequently experience medication errors. Literature describing Canadian models of pharmacy practice in home care settings is limited. The optimal service delivery model and distribution of clinical activities for home care pharmacists remain unclear. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to describe the impact of a pharmacist based at a community home care office and providing home visits, group education, and telephone consultations. The secondary objective was to determine the utility of acute care clinical pharmacy key performance indicators (cpKPIs) in guiding home care pharmacy services, in the absence of validated cpKPIs for ambulatory care. METHODS: The Winnipeg Regional Health Authority hired a pharmacist to develop and implement the pilot program from May 2015 to July 2016. A referral form, consisting of consultation criteria used in primary care practices, was developed. The pharmacist also reviewed all patient intakes and all patients waiting in acute care facilities for initiation of home care services, with the goal of addressing issues before admission to the Home Care Program. A password-protected database was built for data collection and analysis, and the data are presented in aggregate. RESULTS: A total of 197 referrals, involving 184 patients, were received during the pilot program; of these, 62 were excluded from analysis. The majority of referrals (95 [70.4%]) were for targeted medication reviews, and 271 drug therapy problems were identified. Acceptance rates for the pharmacist's recommendations were 90.2% (74 of 82 recommendations) among home care staff and 47.0% (55 of 117 recommendations) among prescribers and patients. On average, 1.5 cpKPIs were identified for each referral. CONCLUSIONS: The pilot program demonstrated a need for enhanced access to clinical pharmacy services for home care patients, although the best model of service provision remains unclear. More research is warranted to determine the optimal pharmacy service for home care patients and the most appropriate cpKPIs to measure its effects.
Entities:
Keywords:
ambulatory care; clinical pharmacy key performance indicators (cpKPIs); home care
Authors: Olavo Fernandes; Sean K Gorman; Richard S Slavik; William M Semchuk; Steve Shalansky; Jean-François Bussières; Douglas Doucette; Heather Bannerman; Jennifer Lo; Simone Shukla; Winnie W Y Chan; Natalie Benninger; Neil J MacKinnon; Chaim M Bell; Jeremy Slobodan; Catherine Lyder; Peter J Zed; Kent Toombs Journal: Ann Pharmacother Date: 2015-03-16 Impact factor: 3.154
Authors: Shannon M L Furbish; Miranda E Kroehl; Danielle F Loeb; Huong Mindy Lam; Carmen L Lewis; Jennifer Nelson; Zeta Chow; Katy E Trinkley Journal: J Pharm Pract Date: 2016-08-01
Authors: Alan J Zillich; Margie E Snyder; Caitlin K Frail; Julie L Lewis; Donny Deshotels; Patrick Dunham; Heather A Jaynes; Jason M Sutherland Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2014-04-09 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Shannon J Von Muenster; Barry L Carter; Cynthia A Weber; Michael E Ernst; Jessica L Milchak; Jennifer J G Steffensmeier; Yinghui Xu Journal: Pharm World Sci Date: 2007-08-21
Authors: Ulrika Gillespie; Anna Alassaad; Dan Henrohn; Hans Garmo; Margareta Hammarlund-Udenaes; Henrik Toss; Asa Kettis-Lindblad; Håkan Melhus; Claes Mörlin Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2009-05-11