Literature DB >> 27605003

To Treat or Not to Treat Metastatic Cancer Patients with Poor Performance Status: a Prospective Experience.

Tamás Kullmann1,2, Hélène Gauthier3, Camille Serrate3, Damien Pouessel3, Christine le Maignan3, Jean-Louis Misset3, Stéphane Culine3.   

Abstract

Administration of cytotoxic chemotherapy for patients with metastatic cancer and poor performance status is a daily clinical challenge. Guidelines only help to select a therapeutic regimen but do not offer a clear response whether or not the patients should be treated. We performed a prospective analysis in 139 metastatic patients with performance status > 1 according to the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scale. A decision was considered correct if patients treated with a medical anticancer treatment lived over 3 months or alternatively patients not treated had a survival under 3 months. The predominant tumor type was non-small cell lung cancer. Patients were chemotherapy naive in 87 cases (63 %). A new line of medical anticancer treatment was started in 107 cases (77 %). The median survival of the study population was 11 weeks (range, 1-53). 84 patients (60 %) died within 3 months while 55 patients (40 %) lived more than 3 months after decision. Treatment decisions were considered as appropriate in 81 cases (58 %). No patient was considered as undertreated. The analysis by pathology allowed to identify pathologies where decisions were correct in the majority of the cases (renal, urothelial and small cell lung cancers), pathologies where appropriate and inappropriate decisions were balanced (prostate, ovarian and breast cancers) and pathologies where decisions for treatment were excessive (non-small cell lung cancer and unknown primary). This prospective study was conducted as part of the evaluation of professional practices in our department. Administration of a medical anticancer treatment validated with patients with good performance status may be harmful for patients with poor performance status. The findings resulted in recommendations for daily practice in order to help physicians, especially for the "don't go" decisions. Until the identification of new prognostic factors for survival and/or the development of therapies making sensitive currently chemoresistant diseases, the initiation of a medical anticancer treatment outside standard situations should result from a consensual decision team or the inclusion in a clinical trial.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cytotoxic chemotherapy; Metastatic cancer; Performance status; Supportive care; Survival; Therapeutic decision

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27605003     DOI: 10.1007/s12253-016-0111-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res        ISSN: 1219-4956            Impact factor:   3.201


  13 in total

1.  Prospective comparison of prognostic scores in palliative care cancer populations.

Authors:  Marco Maltoni; Emanuela Scarpi; Cristina Pittureri; Francesca Martini; Luigi Montanari; Elena Amaducci; Stefania Derni; Laura Fabbri; Marta Rosati; Dino Amadori; Oriana Nanni
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2012-02-29

2.  Prognostic value of circulating VEGFR2+ bone marrow-derived progenitor cells in patients with advanced cancer.

Authors:  Christophe Massard; Isabelle Borget; Marie Cécile Le Deley; Melissa Taylor; Carlos Gomez-Roca; Jean Charles Soria; Françoise Farace
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 9.162

3.  Effect of early palliative care on chemotherapy use and end-of-life care in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Joseph A Greer; William F Pirl; Vicki A Jackson; Alona Muzikansky; Inga T Lennes; Rebecca S Heist; Emily R Gallagher; Jennifer S Temel
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  The aggressiveness of cancer care in the last three months of life: a retrospective single centre analysis.

Authors:  Sofia Braga; Ana Miranda; Rute Fonseca; J L Passos-Coelho; Aires Fernandes; J D Costa; António Moreira
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.894

5.  Early palliative care for patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer S Temel; Joseph A Greer; Alona Muzikansky; Emily R Gallagher; Sonal Admane; Vicki A Jackson; Constance M Dahlin; Craig D Blinderman; Juliet Jacobsen; William F Pirl; J Andrew Billings; Thomas J Lynch
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

Authors:  M M Oken; R H Creech; D C Tormey; J Horton; T E Davis; E T McFadden; P P Carbone
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 2.339

Review 7.  The safety and efficacy of EGFR TKIs monotherapy versus single-agent chemotherapy using third-generation cytotoxics as the first-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and poor performance status.

Authors:  Shan Liu; Deqiang Wang; Bo Chen; Yan Wang; Weihong Zhao; Jianqing Wu
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 5.705

8.  Chemotherapy use and associated factors among cancer patients near the end of life.

Authors:  Young Ho Yun; Miyoung Kwak; Sang Min Park; Samyong Kim; Jong Soo Choi; Ho-Yeong Lim; Chang Geol Lee; Youn Seon Choi; Young Seon Hong; Si-Young Kim; Dae Seog Heo
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 2.935

9.  Assessing 2-month clinical prognosis in hospitalized patients with advanced solid tumors.

Authors:  Anne-Claire Barbot; Pascale Mussault; Pierre Ingrand; Jean-Marc Tourani
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Prospective validation of a prognostic score to improve patient selection for oncology phase I trials.

Authors:  Hendrik-Tobias Arkenau; Jorge Barriuso; David Olmos; Joo Ern Ang; Johann de Bono; Ian Judson; Stan Kaye
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-03-30       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.