Literature DB >> 27605000

Clinical review: the misreporting of logbook, download, and verbal self-measured blood glucose in adults and children with type I diabetes.

Miranda Blackwell1, Benjamin J Wheeler2,3.   

Abstract

Despite advances in technology, the frequent self-measurement of blood glucose (SMBG) remains fundamental to the management of 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Once measured, SMBG results are routinely reported back to health professionals and other interested parties, either verbally, via a logbook, or electronically downloaded from a pump or meter. The misreporting of SMBG using various techniques represents a classic non-adherence behavior and carries with it both acute and chronic dangers. In addition, while this behavior appears very prevalent, many aspects remain largely unstudied. With this in mind, we aimed to summarize literature addressing the misreporting of SMBG in T1DM via a detailed literature search. This produced both recent and past literature. While most of these studies examined the prevalence of deliberate misreporting in a verbal or logbook context, others focused on the motivations behind this behavior, and alternative forms of misreporting, including deliberate manipulation of meters to produce inaccurate results and true technological errors. This timely review covers all aspects of misreporting and highlights multiple patient techniques, which are clearly adapting to advances in technology. We believe that further understanding and attention to this aspect of adherence may lead not only to improvements in glycemic control and safety, but also to the psychological well-being of those affected by type 1 diabetes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adherence; Misreporting; Self-management; Self-measured blood glucose; Type 1 diabetes mellitus

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27605000     DOI: 10.1007/s00592-016-0907-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Diabetol        ISSN: 0940-5429            Impact factor:   4.280


  13 in total

Review 1.  Closing the Loop.

Authors:  Revital Nimri; Nathan Murray; Alexander Ochs; Jordan E Pinsker; Eyal Dassau
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 6.118

2.  Factory-Calibrated Continuous Glucose Sensors: The Science Behind the Technology.

Authors:  Udo Hoss; Erwin Satrya Budiman
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 6.118

3.  Comparing Real-Time Self-Tracking and Device-Recorded Exercise Data in Subjects with Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Danielle Groat; Hyo Jung Kwon; Maria Adela Grando; Curtiss B Cook; Bithika Thompson
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2018-12-26       Impact factor: 2.342

4.  Cutaneous Complications With Continuous or Flash Glucose Monitoring Use: Systematic Review of Trials and Observational Studies.

Authors:  Nurul A Mohd Asarani; Andrew N Reynolds; Sara E Boucher; Martin de Bock; Benjamin J Wheeler
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-08-27

5.  Shared Responsibility for Type 1 Diabetes Care Is Associated With Glycemic Variability and Risk of Glycemic Excursions in Youth.

Authors:  Arwen M Marker; Amy E Noser; Mark A Clements; Susana R Patton
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2018-01-01

Review 6.  How Can We Realize the Clinical Benefits of Continuous Glucose Monitoring?

Authors:  Ramzi A Ajjan
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 6.118

7.  Can Smart Pens Help Improve Diabetes Management?

Authors:  Sarah L Sy; Medha M Munshi; Elena Toschi
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2020-10-21

8.  The 'flash' adhesive study: a randomized crossover trial using an additional adhesive patch to prolong freestyle libre sensor life among youth with type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Brooke L Marsters; Sara E Boucher; Barbara C Galland; Michel de Lange; Esko J Wiltshire; Martin I de Bock; Mona M Elbalshy; Paul A Tomlinson; Jenny Rayns; Karen E MacKenzie; Huan Chan; Benjamin J Wheeler
Journal:  Acta Diabetol       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 4.280

9.  Strengths, Risk Factors, and Resilient Outcomes in Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes: Results From Diabetes MILES Youth-Australia.

Authors:  Marisa E Hilliard; Virginia Hagger; Christel Hendrieckx; Barbara J Anderson; Steven Trawley; Michelle M Jack; Frans Pouwer; Timothy Skinner; Jane Speight
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 10.  Adherence to Medication During Transition to Adult Services.

Authors:  Bianca R Campagna; Kristen Weatherley; Eyal Shemesh; Rachel A Annunziato
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 3.022

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.