| Literature DB >> 27604530 |
Abstract
Debates about how knowledge is made and valued in evidence-based medicine (EBM) have yet to understand what discursive, social, and historical conditions allowed the EBM approach to stabilize and proliferate across western medical education. This paper uses a genealogical approach to examine the epistemological tensions that emerged as a result of various problematizations of uncertainty in medical practice. I explain how the problematization of uncertainty in the literature and the contingency of specific social, political, economic, and historical relations allowed the EBM approach to become a programmatic and pedagogical focus of the Faculty of Medicine at McMaster University and beyond.Keywords: clinical judgment; evidence-based medicine; genealogy; medical education; uncertainty
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27604530 DOI: 10.1007/s10912-016-9398-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Med Humanit ISSN: 1041-3545