Literature DB >> 27604060

Assessing Cardiovascular Risk to Guide Hypertension Diagnosis and Treatment.

Ann Marie Navar1, Michael J Pencina1, Eric D Peterson1.   

Abstract

Importance: The Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) demonstrated the benefit of lowering systolic blood pressure (SBP) to 120 mm Hg, yet other trials, such as Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation-3 (HOPE-3), did not find consistent benefit. How to incorporate these results into the treatment of those with elevated SBP in the general population is not clear.
Objectives: To assess the representativeness of SPRINT and HOPE-3 relative to patients in the United States and to explore the cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk profiles of various populations with elevated SBP. Design, Setting, and Participants: The study examined data from nonpregnant adults aged 20 to 79 years participating in the 2007-2012 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) who had complete data available (n = 14 142), representing 206.9 million US adults. The study was performed from October 1, 2015, to August 2, 2016. Main Outcomes and Measures: The study estimated the number and characteristics of adults with SBP of 120 mm Hg or higher, including SPRINT and HOPE-3 eligibility, and estimated who may have newly required treatment initiation or intensification if various trial or risk-based criteria were applied.
Results: NHANES included completed clinical evaluations from mobile examination centers on 15 974 adults aged 20 to 79 years (mean [SD] age, 45.9 [15.5] years). The study excluded 182 pregnant women and 1650 adults in whom CVD risk data were unavailable, leaving a final study population of 14 142 (50.5% women [95% CI, 49.6%-51.3%] and 49.5% men [95% CI, 48.6%-50.4%]). An estimated 53.3 million untreated and 19.8 million treated US adults have an SBP in the diagnostic and treatment gray zone (120-139 mm Hg), a small proportion of whom would have been eligible for SPRINT (5.4% untreated, 13.9% treated) or HOPE-3 (13.9% treated, 1.7% untreated). Even among those with prior CVD or high risk of CVD and elevated SBP (120-139 mm Hg), only a few would have qualified for SPRINT (27.0% and 21.9% of untreated and treated patients, respectively) or HOPE-3 (10.6% and 2.1% of untreated and treated, respectively). If blood pressure treatment recommendations were extended to adults with an SBP between 120 and 139 mm Hg, as well as prior CVD or CVD risk of 15% or higher, then 5.8 million untreated adults would be reclassified as treatment eligible; furthermore, 8.5 million treated patients would require medication intensification. Conclusions and Relevance: Millions of US adults have elevated SBP and high CVD risk, most of whom would not have been eligible for SPRINT. Until more definitive evidence becomes available, clinicians should consider a management paradigm based on CVD risk in addition to blood pressure measurements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27604060      PMCID: PMC5549553          DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.2861

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Cardiol            Impact factor:   14.676


  23 in total

1.  2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Neil J Stone; Jennifer G Robinson; Alice H Lichtenstein; C Noel Bairey Merz; Conrad B Blum; Robert H Eckel; Anne C Goldberg; David Gordon; Daniel Levy; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Patrick McBride; J Sanford Schwartz; Susan T Shero; Sidney C Smith; Karol Watson; Peter W F Wilson
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  National health and nutrition examination survey: analytic guidelines, 1999-2010.

Authors:  Clifford L Johnson; Ryne Paulose-Ram; Cynthia L Ogden; Margaret D Carroll; Deanna Kruszon-Moran; Sylvia M Dohrmann; Lester R Curtin
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 2       Date:  2013-09

3.  Effects of intensive blood-pressure control in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  William C Cushman; Gregory W Evans; Robert P Byington; David C Goff; Richard H Grimm; Jeffrey A Cutler; Denise G Simons-Morton; Jan N Basile; Marshall A Corson; Jeffrey L Probstfield; Lois Katz; Kevin A Peterson; William T Friedewald; John B Buse; J Thomas Bigger; Hertzel C Gerstein; Faramarz Ismail-Beigi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-03-14       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care: the Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  Ralph B D'Agostino; Ramachandran S Vasan; Michael J Pencina; Philip A Wolf; Mark Cobain; Joseph M Massaro; William B Kannel
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies.

Authors:  Sarah Lewington; Robert Clarke; Nawab Qizilbash; Richard Peto; Rory Collins
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-12-14       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Principal results of the Japanese trial to assess optimal systolic blood pressure in elderly hypertensive patients (JATOS).

Authors: 
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.872

7.  Generalizability of SPRINT Results to the U.S. Adult Population.

Authors:  Adam P Bress; Rikki M Tanner; Rachel Hess; Lisandro D Colantonio; Daichi Shimbo; Paul Muntner
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Blood-pressure targets in patients with recent lacunar stroke: the SPS3 randomised trial.

Authors:  O R Benavente; C S Coffey; R Conwit; R G Hart; L A McClure; L A Pearce; P E Pergola; J M Szychowski
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Blood-Pressure Lowering in Intermediate-Risk Persons without Cardiovascular Disease.

Authors:  Eva M Lonn; Jackie Bosch; Patricio López-Jaramillo; Jun Zhu; Lisheng Liu; Prem Pais; Rafael Diaz; Denis Xavier; Karen Sliwa; Antonio Dans; Alvaro Avezum; Leopoldo S Piegas; Katalin Keltai; Matyas Keltai; Irina Chazova; Ron J G Peters; Claes Held; Khalid Yusoff; Basil S Lewis; Petr Jansky; Alexander Parkhomenko; Kamlesh Khunti; William D Toff; Christopher M Reid; John Varigos; Lawrence A Leiter; Dora I Molina; Robert McKelvie; Janice Pogue; Joanne Wilkinson; Hyejung Jung; Gilles Dagenais; Salim Yusuf
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-04-02       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Blood pressure-lowering treatment based on cardiovascular risk: a meta-analysis of individual patient data.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-08-16       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  8 in total

1.  Hypertension highlights during 2016.

Authors:  Wilbert S Aronow
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-10

2.  Initiation of antihypertensive therapy.

Authors:  Wilbert S Aronow
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-02

3.  Coronary Artery Calcium to Guide a Personalized Risk-Based Approach to Initiation and Intensification of Antihypertensive Therapy.

Authors:  John W McEvoy; Seth S Martin; Zeina A Dardari; Michael D Miedema; Veit Sandfort; Joseph Yeboah; Matthew J Budoff; David C Goff; Bruce M Psaty; Wendy S Post; Khurram Nasir; Roger S Blumenthal; Michael J Blaha
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 4.  Contemporary Drug Treatment of Hypertension: Focus on Recent Guidelines.

Authors:  Wilbert S Aronow; William H Frishman
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  Use of machine learning in geriatric clinical care for chronic diseases: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Avishek Choudhury; Emily Renjilian; Onur Asan
Journal:  JAMIA Open       Date:  2020-10-08

6.  Incremental effects of antihypertensive drugs: instrumental variable analysis.

Authors:  Adam A Markovitz; Jacob A Mack; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; John Z Ayanian; Andrew M Ryan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2017-12-22

7.  Quantifying Importance of Major Risk Factors for Coronary Heart Disease.

Authors:  Michael J Pencina; Ann Marie Navar; Daniel Wojdyla; Robert J Sanchez; Irfan Khan; Joseph Elassal; Ralph B D'Agostino; Eric D Peterson; Allan D Sniderman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 8.  Managing Hypertension in the elderly: What's new?

Authors:  Wilbert S Aronow
Journal:  Am J Prev Cardiol       Date:  2020-05-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.