Literature DB >> 25131978

Blood pressure-lowering treatment based on cardiovascular risk: a meta-analysis of individual patient data.

.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate whether the benefits of blood pressure-lowering drugs are proportional to baseline cardiovascular risk, to establish whether absolute risk could be used to inform treatment decisions for blood pressure-lowering therapy, as is recommended for lipid-lowering therapy.
METHODS: This meta-analysis included individual participant data from trials that randomly assigned patients to either blood pressure-lowering drugs or placebo, or to more intensive or less intensive blood pressure-lowering regimens. The primary outcome was total major cardiovascular events, consisting of stroke, heart attack, heart failure, or cardiovascular death. Participants were separated into four categories of baseline 5-year major cardiovascular risk using a risk prediction equation developed from the placebo groups of the included trials (<11%, 11-15%, 15-21%, >21%).
FINDINGS: 11 trials and 26 randomised groups met the inclusion criteria, and included 67,475 individuals, of whom 51,917 had available data for the calculation of the risk equations. 4167 (8%) had a cardiovascular event during a median of 4·0 years (IQR 3·4-4·4) of follow-up. The mean estimated baseline levels of 5-year cardiovascular risk for each of the four risk groups were 6·0% (SD 2·0), 12·1% (1·5), 17·7% (1·7), and 26·8% (5·4). In each consecutive higher risk group, blood pressure-lowering treatment reduced the risk of cardiovascular events relatively by 18% (95% CI 7-27), 15% (4-25), 13% (2-22), and 15% (5-24), respectively (p=0·30 for trend). However, in absolute terms, treating 1000 patients in each group with blood pressure-lowering treatment for 5 years would prevent 14 (95% CI 8-21), 20 (8-31), 24 (8-40), and 38 (16-61) cardiovascular events, respectively (p=0·04 for trend).
INTERPRETATION: Lowering blood pressure provides similar relative protection at all levels of baseline cardiovascular risk, but progressively greater absolute risk reductions as baseline risk increases. These results support the use of predicted baseline cardiovascular disease risk equations to inform blood pressure-lowering treatment decisions. FUNDING: None.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25131978     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61212-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  169 in total

Review 1.  Cardiovascular risk factors following renal transplant.

Authors:  Jill Neale; Alice C Smith
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2015-12-24

Review 2.  The J-shaped Curve for Blood Pressure and Cardiovascular Disease Risk: Historical Context and Recent Updates.

Authors:  Faisal Rahman; John W McEvoy
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 5.113

3.  Effect of intensive lowering of systolic blood pressure treatment on heart failure events: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.

Authors:  Yun Zhang; Mingming Liang; Chenyu Sun; Guangbo Qu; Tingting Shi; Min Min; Yile Wu; Yehuan Sun
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 3.012

4.  Effect of nebivolol or atenolol vs. placebo on cardiovascular health in subjects with borderline blood pressure: the EVIDENCE study.

Authors:  Daniel A Duprez; Natalia Florea; Sue Duval; Catherine Koukol; Jay N Cohn
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 3.012

5.  [Antihypertensive drug therapy : Where do we stand?].

Authors:  M Middeke
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 6.  Efficient design of clinical trials and epidemiological research: is it possible?

Authors:  Michael S Lauer; David Gordon; Gina Wei; Gail Pearson
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 7.  A practical approach to the pharmacological management of hypertension in older people.

Authors:  Nikesh Parekh; Amy Page; Khalid Ali; Kevin Davies; Chakravarthi Rajkumar
Journal:  Ther Adv Drug Saf       Date:  2016-12-27

8.  Prevalence of Hypertension and Cardiovascular Risk According to Blood Pressure Thresholds Used for Diagnosis.

Authors:  Julio A Lamprea-Montealegre; Leila R Zelnick; Yoshio N Hall; Nisha Bansal; Ian H de Boer
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 9.  BP Targets in Hypertension: What Should We Do Now That SPRINT Is Out?

Authors:  Hemal Bhatt; Lama Ghazi; David Calhoun; Suzanne Oparil
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.931

10.  Implications of the Eighth Joint National Committee Guidelines for the Management of High Blood Pressure for Aging Adults: Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study.

Authors:  Michael D Miedema; Faye L Lopez; Michael J Blaha; Salim S Virani; Josef Coresh; Christie M Ballantyne; Aaron R Folsom
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 10.190

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.