Literature DB >> 27602694

In Silico Prediction of Volume of Distribution in Humans. Extensive Data Set and the Exploration of Linear and Nonlinear Methods Coupled with Molecular Interaction Fields Descriptors.

Franco Lombardo1, Yankang Jing1.   

Abstract

We present three in silico volume of distribution at steady state (VDss) models generated on a training set comprising 1096 compounds, which goes well beyond the conventional drug space delineated by the Rule of 5 or similar approaches. We have performed a careful selection of descriptors and kept a homogeneous Molecular Interaction Field-based descriptor set and linear (Partial Least Squares, PLS) and nonlinear (Random Forest, RF) models. We have tested the models, which we deem orthogonal in nature due to different descriptors and statistical approaches, with good results. In particular we tested the RF model, via a leave-class-out approach and by using a set of 34 additional compounds not used for training. We report comparable results against in vivo scaling approaches with geometric mean-fold error at or below 2 (for a set of 60 compounds with animal data available) and discuss the predictive performance based on the ionization states of the compounds. Lastly, we report the findings using a two-tier approach (classification followed by regression) based on VDss ranges, in an attempt to improve the prediction of compounds with very high VDss. We would recommend, overall, the RF model, with 33 descriptors, as the primary choice for VDss prediction in humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27602694     DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  7 in total

1.  How effective are ionization state-based QSPKR models at predicting pharmacokinetic parameters in humans?

Authors:  Anish Gomatam; Blessy Joseph; Poonam Advani; Mushtaque Shaikh; Krishna Iyer; Evans Coutinho
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2022-10-11       Impact factor: 3.364

2.  Machine Learning in Drug Discovery: A Review.

Authors:  Suresh Dara; Swetha Dhamercherla; Surender Singh Jadav; Ch Madhu Babu; Mohamed Jawed Ahsan
Journal:  Artif Intell Rev       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 9.588

3.  Structure‒tissue exposure/selectivity relationship (STR) correlates with clinical efficacy/safety.

Authors:  Wei Gao; Hongxiang Hu; Lipeng Dai; Miao He; Hebao Yuan; Huixia Zhang; Jinhui Liao; Bo Wen; Yan Li; Maria Palmisano; Mohamed Dit Mady Traore; Simon Zhou; Duxin Sun
Journal:  Acta Pharm Sin B       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 14.903

4.  ADME-Space: a new tool for medicinal chemists to explore ADME properties.

Authors:  Giovanni Bocci; Emanuele Carosati; Philippe Vayer; Alban Arrault; Sylvain Lozano; Gabriele Cruciani
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Prediction of pKa Values for Neutral and Basic Drugs based on Hybrid Artificial Intelligence Methods.

Authors:  Mengshan Li; Huaijing Zhang; Bingsheng Chen; Yan Wu; Lixin Guan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  On modeling and utilizing chemical compound information with deep learning technologies: A task-oriented approach.

Authors:  Sangsoo Lim; Sangseon Lee; Yinhua Piao; MinGyu Choi; Dongmin Bang; Jeonghyeon Gu; Sun Kim
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 6.155

7.  Predicting Total Drug Clearance and Volumes of Distribution Using the Machine Learning-Mediated Multimodal Method through the Imputation of Various Nonclinical Data.

Authors:  Hiroaki Iwata; Tatsuru Matsuo; Hideaki Mamada; Takahisa Motomura; Mayumi Matsushita; Takeshi Fujiwara; Kazuya Maeda; Koichi Handa
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 6.162

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.