Literature DB >> 27601552

Use and Effectiveness of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Treatment of Ovarian Cancer.

Larissa A Meyer1, Angel M Cronin1, Charlotte C Sun1, Kristin Bixel1, Michael A Bookman1, Mihaela C Cristea1, Jennifer J Griggs1, Charles F Levenback1, Robert A Burger1, Gina Mantia-Smaldone1, Ursula A Matulonis1, Joyce C Niland1, David M O'Malley1, Alexi A Wright1.   

Abstract

Purpose In 2010, a randomized clinical trial demonstrated noninferior survival for patients with advanced ovarian cancer who were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) compared with primary cytoreductive surgery (PCS). We examined the use and effectiveness of NACT in clinical practice. Patients and Methods A multi-institutional observational study of 1,538 women with stages IIIC to IV ovarian cancer who were treated at six National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers. We examined NACT use in patients who were diagnosed between 2003 and 2012 (N = 1,538) and compared overall survival (OS), morbidity, and postoperative residual disease in a propensity-score matched sample of patients (N = 594). Results NACT use increased from 16% during 2003 to 2010 to 34% during 2011 to 2012 in stage IIIC disease ( Ptrend < .001), and from 41% to 62% in stage IV disease ( Ptrend < .001). Adoption of NACT varied by institution, from 8% to 30% for stage IIIC disease (P < .001) and from 27% to 61% ( P = .007) for stage IV disease during this time period. In the matched sample, NACT was associated with shorter OS in stage IIIC disease (median OS: 33 v 43 months; hazard ratio [HR], 1.40; 95% CI, 1.11 to 1.77) compared with PCS, but not stage IV disease (median OS: 31 v 36 months; HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.89 to 1.52). Patients with stages IIIC and IV disease who received NACT were less likely to have ≥ 1 cm postoperative residual disease, an intensive care unit admission, or a rehospitalization (all P ≤ .04) compared with those who received PCS treatment. However, among women with stage IIIC disease who achieved microscopic or ≤ 1 cm postoperative residual disease, NACT was associated with decreased OS (HR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.01 to 2.18; P = .04). Conclusion Use of NACT increased significantly between 2003 and 2012. In this observational study, PCS was associated with increased survival in stage IIIC, but not stage IV disease. Future studies should prospectively consider the efficacy of NACT by extent of residual disease in unselected patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27601552      PMCID: PMC5477982          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2016.68.1239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  28 in total

1.  Does aggressive surgery improve outcomes? Interaction between preoperative disease burden and complex surgery in patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer: an analysis of GOG 182.

Authors:  Neil S Horowitz; Austin Miller; Bunja Rungruang; Scott D Richard; Noah Rodriguez; Michael A Bookman; Chad A Hamilton; Thomas C Krivak; G Larry Maxwell
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Does neoadjuvant chemotherapy increase optimal cytoreduction rate in advanced ovarian cancer? Meta-analysis of 21 studies.

Authors:  Sokbom Kang; Byung-Ho Nam
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group.

Authors:  R B D'Agostino
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 4.  New paradigms in the surgical and adjuvant treatment of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  M Hodeib; R N Eskander; R E Bristow
Journal:  Minerva Ginecol       Date:  2014-04

5.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

6.  Explaining geographic variations. The enthusiasm hypothesis.

Authors:  M R Chassin
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  The impact of bulky upper abdominal disease cephalad to the greater omentum on surgical outcome for stage IIIC epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer.

Authors:  Oliver Zivanovic; Eric L Eisenhauer; Qin Zhou; Alexia Iasonos; Paul Sabbatini; Yukio Sonoda; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Richard R Barakat; Dennis S Chi
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  Relationship among surgical complexity, short-term morbidity, and overall survival in primary surgery for advanced ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Giovanni D Aletti; Sean C Dowdy; Karl C Podratz; William A Cliby
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Prognostic factors for stage III epithelial ovarian cancer treated with intraperitoneal chemotherapy: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

Authors:  Lisa M Landrum; James Java; Cara A Mathews; Grainger S Lanneau; Larry J Copeland; Deborah K Armstrong; Joan L Walker
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 5.482

10.  Spatial and temporal heterogeneity in high-grade serous ovarian cancer: a phylogenetic analysis.

Authors:  Roland F Schwarz; Charlotte K Y Ng; Susanna L Cooke; Scott Newman; Jillian Temple; Anna M Piskorz; Davina Gale; Karen Sayal; Muhammed Murtaza; Peter J Baldwin; Nitzan Rosenfeld; Helena M Earl; Evis Sala; Mercedes Jimenez-Linan; Christine A Parkinson; Florian Markowetz; James D Brenton
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  34 in total

1.  Age-Associated Risk of 90-Day Postoperative Mortality After Cytoreductive Surgery for Advanced Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Alexander Melamed; Alexandra S Bercow; Katherine Bunnell; J Alejandro Rauh-Hain; Jason D Wright; Laurel W Rice; Marcela G Del Carmen
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 14.766

2.  Cost effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval cytoreductive surgery versus primary cytoreductive surgery for patients with advanced stage ovarian cancer during the initial treatment phase.

Authors:  Arthur-Quan Tran; Daniel O Erim; Stephanie A Sullivan; Ashley L Cole; Emma L Barber; Kenneth H Kim; Paola A Gehrig; Stephanie B Wheeler
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Survival outcome and perioperative complication related to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel for advanced ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hiroko Machida; Hideki Tokunaga; Koji Matsuo; Noriomi Matsumura; Yoichi Kobayashi; Tsutomu Tabata; Masanori Kaneuchi; Satoru Nagase; Mikio Mikami
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 4.424

4.  Variation in neoadjuvant chemotherapy utilization for epithelial ovarian cancer at high volume hospitals in the United States and associated survival.

Authors:  Emma L Barber; Stacie B Dusetzina; Karyn B Stitzenberg; Emma C Rossi; Paola A Gehrig; John F Boggess; Joanne M Garrett
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Economic Analysis of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Versus Primary Debulking Surgery for Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Using an Aggressive Surgical Paradigm.

Authors:  Ashley L Cole; Emma L Barber; Anagha Gogate; Arthur-Quan Tran; Stephanie B Wheeler
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 3.437

6.  National trends in bowel and upper abdominal procedures in ovarian cancer surgery.

Authors:  Joseph A Dottino; Weiguo He; Charlotte C Sun; Hui Zhao; Shuangshuang Fu; Jose Alejandro Rauh-Hain; Rudy S Suidan; Karen H Lu; Sharon H Giordano; Larissa A Meyer
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 3.437

7.  Optimal primary management of bulky stage IIIC ovarian, fallopian tube and peritoneal carcinoma: Are the only options complete gross resection at primary debulking surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy?

Authors:  Vasileios D Sioulas; Maria B Schiavone; David Kadouri; Oliver Zivanovic; Kara Long Roche; Roisin O'Cearbhaill; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Douglas A Levine; Yukio Sonoda; Ginger J Gardner; Mario M Leitao; Dennis S Chi
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  Video-assisted thoracic surgery in the primary management of advanced ovarian carcinoma with moderate to large pleural effusions: A Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Team Ovary Study.

Authors:  Thomas Boerner; Olga T Filippova; Andrew J Chi; Alexia Iasonos; Qin C Zhou; Kara Long Roche; Oliver Zivanovic; Bernard J Park; James Huang; David R Jones; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Ginger Gardner; Yukio Sonoda; Dennis S Chi
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  Concordance of a laparoscopic scoring algorithm with primary surgery findings in advanced stage ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Jean M Hansen; Anil K Sood; Robert L Coleman; Shannon N Westin; Pamela T Soliman; Pedro T Ramirez; Bryan M Fellman; Kathleen M Schmeler; Nicole D Fleming
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 5.482

10.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in elderly women with ovarian cancer: Rates of use and effectiveness.

Authors:  Larissa A Meyer; Weiguo He; Charlotte C Sun; Hui Zhao; Alexi A Wright; Rudy S Suidan; Joseph Dottino; J Alejandro Rauh-Hain; Karen H Lu; Sharon H Giordano
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 5.482

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.