Literature DB >> 18060979

Relationship among surgical complexity, short-term morbidity, and overall survival in primary surgery for advanced ovarian cancer.

Giovanni D Aletti1, Sean C Dowdy, Karl C Podratz, William A Cliby.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Advanced ovarian cancer (OC) is associated with impaired performance status and comorbidities for many patients. These factors have an impact on the decision to perform extended surgical cytoreduction. However, the trade-off between short-term morbidity and overall survival is complex, and few data are available analyzing the combined effects of these variables.
PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the impact of patients' age and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) and surgical complexity score (SCS) on short-term morbidity and overall survival. STUDY
DESIGN: Presurgical patient characteristics, surgical procedures performed, and outcomes were assessed in a cohort of consecutive primary OC patients. An SCS from 1 to 3 was developed to adjust for the extent of surgery (simple to complex, respectively). Primary outcomes were 30 day major morbidity (sepsis, thromboembolic, cardiac, or reoperation), 3 month mortality, and overall survival (OS).
RESULTS: Two hundred nineteen consecutive patients with stage IIIC-IV OC were included. We observed a correlation between ASA and both short-term morbidity (P = .006) and 3 month mortality (P = .006). Age was independently associated with both short-term morbidity (P = .010) and 3 month mortality (P = .005). SCS correlated directly with morbidity (P < .001) but was not correlated with mortality (P = .266). The independent predictors of morbidity (ASA, age, and SCS) were used to develop risk prediction categories: risk of expected complications ranged from 2.5% to 67.6%, depending on category. Despite the increased risk of complications, however, more complex surgery carried a survival benefit in all the risk groups, owing to the observation that residual disease (RD) and SCS held a prognostic significance independent of age and ASA (P < .001 and P = .001, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Because of the survival benefit from lower RD, a less aggressive surgical effort results in poorer OS. However, the risk of complications are substantial for complex surgeries in the highest-risk patients: risk stratification should be used to help plan perioperative care and consider optimal treatment planning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18060979     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.10.495

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  84 in total

1.  Does aggressive surgery improve outcomes? Interaction between preoperative disease burden and complex surgery in patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer: an analysis of GOG 182.

Authors:  Neil S Horowitz; Austin Miller; Bunja Rungruang; Scott D Richard; Noah Rodriguez; Michael A Bookman; Chad A Hamilton; Thomas C Krivak; G Larry Maxwell
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Incidence and predictors of venous thromboembolism after debulking surgery for epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Bahareh Mokri; Andrea Mariani; John A Heit; Amy L Weaver; Michaela E McGree; Janice R Martin; Maureen A Lemens; William A Cliby; Jamie N Bakkum-Gamez
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.437

3.  The impact of perioperative packed red blood cell transfusion on survival in epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Lindsay L Morgenstern Warner; Sean C Dowdy; Janice R Martin; Maureen A Lemens; Michaela E McGree; Amy L Weaver; Karl C Podratz; Jamie N Bakkum-Gamez
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.437

Review 4.  The role of biomarkers in the management of epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Wei-Lei Yang; Zhen Lu; Robert C Bast
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 5.225

5.  Predictive value of the Age-Adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index on perioperative complications and survival in patients undergoing primary debulking surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Rudy S Suidan; Mario M Leitao; Oliver Zivanovic; Ginger J Gardner; Kara C Long Roche; Yukio Sonoda; Douglas A Levine; Elizabeth L Jewell; Carol L Brown; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Mary E Charlson; Dennis S Chi
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-05-31       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  Incidence of and risk factors for postoperative ileus in women undergoing primary staging and debulking for epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  Jamie N Bakkum-Gamez; Carrie L Langstraat; Janice R Martin; Maureen A Lemens; Amy L Weaver; Sumer Allensworth; Sean C Dowdy; William A Cliby; Bobbie S Gostout; Karl C Podratz
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 7.  Review of methodological challenges in comparing the effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus primary debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer in the United States.

Authors:  Ashley L Cole; Anna E Austin; Ryan P Hickson; Matthew S Dixon; Emma L Barber
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Impact of implementation of an enhanced recovery program in gynecologic surgery on healthcare costs.

Authors:  Ross F Harrison; Yao Li; Alexis Guzman; Brandelyn Pitcher; Andrea Rodriguez-Restrepo; Katherine E Cain; Maria D Iniesta; Javier D Lasala; Pedro T Ramirez; Larissa A Meyer
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Less guessing, more evidence in identifying patients least fit for cytoreductive surgery in advanced ovarian cancer: A triage algorithm to individualize surgical management.

Authors:  Deepa Maheswari Narasimhulu; Amanika Kumar; Amy L Weaver; Carrie L Langstraat; William A Cliby
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 5.482

10.  Role of CT scan-based and clinical evaluation in the preoperative prediction of optimal cytoreduction in advanced ovarian cancer: a prospective trial.

Authors:  G Ferrandina; G Sallustio; A Fagotti; G Vizzielli; A Paglia; E Cucci; A Margariti; L Aquilani; G Garganese; G Scambia
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-09-08       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.