Literature DB >> 27601305

Solubilized extracellular matrix bioscaffolds derived from diverse source tissues differentially influence macrophage phenotype.

Jenna L Dziki1,2, Derek S Wang1, Catalina Pineda1,2, Brian M Sicari1,3, Theresa Rausch1, Stephen F Badylak1,2,3.   

Abstract

The host response to biomaterials is a critical determinant of their success or failure in tissue-repair applications. Macrophages are among the first responders in the host response to biomaterials and have been shown to be predictors of downstream tissue remodeling events. Biomaterials composed of mammalian extracellular matrix (ECM) in particular have been shown to promote distinctive and constructive remodeling outcomes when compared to their synthetic counterparts, a property that has been largely attributed to their ability to modulate the host macrophage response. ECM bioscaffolds are prepared by decellularizing source tissues such as dermis and small intestinal submucosa. The differential ability of such scaffolds to influence macrophage behavior has not been determined. The present study determines the effects of ECM bioscaffolds derived from eight different source tissues upon macrophage surface marker expression, protein content, phagocytic capability, metabolism, and antimicrobial activity. The results show that macrophages exposed to small intestinal submucosa (SIS), urinary bladder matrix (UBM), brain ECM (bECM), esophageal ECM (eECM), and colonic ECM (coECM) express a predominant M2-like macrophage phenotype, which is pro-remodeling and anti-inflammatory (iNOS-/Fizz1+/CD206+). In contrast, macrophage exposure to dermal ECM resulted in a predominant M1-like, pro-inflammatory phenotype (iNOS+/Fizz1-/CD206-), whereas liver ECM (LECM) and skeletal muscle ECM (mECM) did not significantly change the expression of these markers. All solubilized ECM bioscaffold treatments resulted in an increased macrophage antimicrobial activity, but no differences were evident in macrophage phagocytic capabilities, and macrophage metabolism was decreased following exposure to UBM, bECM, mECM, coECM, and dECM. The present work could have important implications when considering the macrophage response following ECM implantation for site-appropriate tissue remodeling.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 105A: 138-147, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biologic scaffold; bioscaffold; extracellular matrix; host response; macrophages

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27601305     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.35894

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A        ISSN: 1549-3296            Impact factor:   4.396


  47 in total

Review 1.  Advances in Biomaterials for Drug Delivery.

Authors:  Owen S Fenton; Katy N Olafson; Padmini S Pillai; Michael J Mitchell; Robert Langer
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 30.849

Review 2.  Extracellular Matrix-Based Strategies for Immunomodulatory Biomaterials Engineering.

Authors:  Andrew T Rowley; Raji R Nagalla; Szu-Wen Wang; Wendy F Liu
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 9.933

Review 3.  Regenerative Scar-Free Skin Wound Healing.

Authors:  Mehri Monavarian; Safaa Kader; Seyedsina Moeinzadeh; Esmaiel Jabbari
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 6.389

Review 4.  Extracellular Matrix Bioscaffolds as Immunomodulatory Biomaterials<sup/>.

Authors:  Jenna L Dziki; Luai Huleihel; Michelle E Scarritt; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 3.845

5.  Matrix-Bound Nanovesicles Recapitulate Extracellular Matrix Effects on Macrophage Phenotype.

Authors:  Luai Huleihel; Joseph G Bartolacci; Jenna L Dziki; Tatiana Vorobyov; Brooke Arnold; Michelle E Scarritt; Catalina Pineda Molina; Samuel T LoPresti; Bryan N Brown; Juan Diego Naranjo; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 3.845

6.  Distinct macrophage populations and phenotypes associated with IL-4 mediated immunomodulation at the host implant interface.

Authors:  Daniel Hachim; Samuel T LoPresti; Rahul D Rege; Yuta Umeda; Aimon Iftikhar; Alexis L Nolfi; Clint D Skillen; Bryan N Brown
Journal:  Biomater Sci       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 6.843

7.   Extracellular Matrix-Based Biomaterials and Their Influence Upon Cell Behavior.

Authors:  Madeline C Cramer; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 8.  Biomaterial strategies for generating therapeutic immune responses.

Authors:  Sean H Kelly; Lucas S Shores; Nicole L Votaw; Joel H Collier
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 15.470

9.  Differential degradation rate and underlying mechanism of a collagen/chitosan complex in subcutis, spinal cord and brain tissues of rat.

Authors:  Feng Fu; Xiang Zhu; Zhe Qin; Jing-Jing Wang; Chao Xu; Li-Na Wang; Yue Tu; Sai Zhang; Rui-Xin Li; Xiao-Hong Li; Ming-Liang Zhao
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 3.896

10.  Effect of Source Animal Age upon Macrophage Response to Extracellular Matrix Biomaterials.

Authors:  Samuel T LoPresti; Bryan N Brown
Journal:  J Immunol Regen Med       Date:  2018-04-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.