Literature DB >> 27600874

Agreement and precision of periprosthetic bone density measurements in micro-CT, single and dual energy CT.

Bo Mussmann1,2, Søren Overgaard2,3, Trine Torfing1,2, Peter Traise4, Oke Gerke5,6, Poul Erik Andersen1,2.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to test the precision and agreement between bone mineral density measurements performed in micro CT, single and dual energy computed tomography, to determine how the keV level influences density measurements and to assess the usefulness of quantitative dual energy computed tomography as a research tool for longitudinal studies aiming to measure bone loss adjacent to total hip replacements. Samples from 10 fresh-frozen porcine femoral heads were placed in a Perspex phantom and computed tomography was performed with two acquisition modes. Bone mineral density was calculated and compared with measurements derived from micro CT. Repeated scans and dual measurements were performed in order to measure between- and within-scan precision. Mean density difference between micro CT and single energy computed tomography was 72 mg HA/cm3 . For dual energy CT, the mean difference at 100 keV was 128 mg HA/cm3 while the mean difference at 110-140 keV ranged from -84 to -67 mg HA/cm3 compared with micro CT. Rescanning the samples resulted in a non-significant overall between-scan difference of 13 mg HA/cm3 . Bland-Altman limits of agreement were wide and intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.29 to 0.72, while 95% confidence intervals covered almost the full possible range. Repeating the density measurements for within-scan precision resulted in ICCs >0.99 and narrow limits of agreement. Single and dual energy quantitative CT showed excellent within-scan precision, but poor between-scan precision. No significant density differences were found in dual energy quantitative CT at keV-levels above 110 keV.
© 2016 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 35:1470-1477, 2017. © 2016 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Keywords:  bone loss; bone mineral density; hip; micro CT; quantitative CT

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27600874     DOI: 10.1002/jor.23417

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  4 in total

1.  Role of coronal high-resolution diffusion-weighted imaging in acute optic neuritis: a comparison with axial orientation.

Authors:  Ping Lu; Yan Sha; Hailin Wan; Feng Wang; Guohong Tian
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Intra- and inter-observer agreement and reliability of bone mineral density measurements around acetabular cup: a porcine ex-vivo study using single- and dual-energy computed tomography.

Authors:  Bo Mussmann; Søren Overgaard; Trine Torfing; Morten Bøgehøj; Oke Gerke; Poul Erik Andersen
Journal:  Acta Radiol Open       Date:  2017-07-14

3.  Measurement Uncertainty in Spine Bone Mineral Density by Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry.

Authors:  Ae-Ja Park; Jun-Il Yoo; Jee-Hye Choi; Kyun Shik Chae; Chang Geun Kim; Dal Sik Kim
Journal:  J Bone Metab       Date:  2017-05-31

4.  Three-Dimensional Micro-Computed Tomography of the Adult Mouse Ovary.

Authors:  Giulia Fiorentino; Annapaola Parrilli; Silvia Garagna; Maurizio Zuccotti
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2020-10-19
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.