Literature DB >> 2760076

Intramedullary nailing with reaming to treat non-union of the tibia.

S L Sledge1, K D Johnson, M B Henley, J T Watson.   

Abstract

The records of fifty-one patients who were treated by intramedullary nailing with reaming for non-union of the tibia were retrospectively reviewed. The fractures had been treated initially by closed reduction and immobilization in a cast, external fixation followed by immobilization in a cast, fixation by pins incorporated in a plaster cast, minimum internal fixation and immobilization in a cast, dynamic compression plating, or intramedullary nailing with or without reaming. After the initial treatment had failed, intramedullary nailing with reaming was done to gain union. Although closed nailing of the tibia was preferred, in thirty-three patients, the site of the non-union was opened to improve alignment by performing an osteotomy or to remove failed hardware. Bone grafts from the iliac crest were used in ten patients, and a fibular ostectomy or osteotomy was done in thirty-three. Of thirty-four open fractures (fourteen grade I, seven grade II, and thirteen grade III), eight were infected at the time of intramedullary nailing. The average time of the diagnosis of a non-union was 9.6 months; the average length of follow-up after nailing was twenty months. In forty-nine (96 per cent) of the fifty-one patients, tibial union occurred at an average of seven months postoperatively. Complications included persistent infection (three patients), acquired infection after intramedullary nailing with reaming (three patients), fracture of the nail that necessitated an additional operation (two patients), shortening of more than one centimeter (two patients), malrotation of more than 15 degrees (one patient), peroneal palsy (one patient), and amputation (one patient). When used to treat non-union of the tibia, intramedullary nailing with reaming can produce union as effectively as other alternatives, while enabling the patient to function more normally without external immobilization or walking aids.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2760076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  6 in total

1.  Exchange reamed nailing compared to augmentation compression plating leaving the inserted nail in situ in the treatment of aseptic tibial non-union: a two-centre study.

Authors:  Atesch Ateschrang; Georgios Karavalakis; Christoph Gonser; Ulrich Liener; Thomas Freude; Ulrich Stöckle; Matthias Walcher; Derek Zieker
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 1.704

2.  Interlocking intramedullary nailing for the treatment of tibial fractures.

Authors:  J O'Beirne; P Seigne; J P McElwain
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  Comparative study of the use of electromagnetic fields in patients with pseudoarthrosis of tibia treated by intramedullary nailing.

Authors:  Juan L Cebrián; Pilar Gallego; Alberto Francés; Piedad Sánchez; Elena Manrique; Fernando Marco; Luis López-Durán
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Induction of periosteal bone formation by intraosseous BMP-2 injection in a mouse model of osteogenesis imperfecta.

Authors:  T L Cheng; L C Cantrill; A Schindeler; D G Little
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 1.548

Review 5.  Computational modeling of bone fracture non-unions: four clinically relevant case studies.

Authors:  Aurélie Carlier; Johan Lammens; Hans Van Oosterwyck; Liesbet Geris
Journal:  In Silico Cell Tissue Sci       Date:  2015-12-18

6.  Bone transport for the management of severely comminuted fractures without bone loss.

Authors:  Mootaz F Thakeb; Mahmoud A Mahran; El-Hussein M El-Motassem
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2016-02-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.