Literature DB >> 19462169

Comparative study of the use of electromagnetic fields in patients with pseudoarthrosis of tibia treated by intramedullary nailing.

Juan L Cebrián1, Pilar Gallego, Alberto Francés, Piedad Sánchez, Elena Manrique, Fernando Marco, Luis López-Durán.   

Abstract

We made a comparative cohort study in patients suffering from tibial pseudoarthrosis, all of whom were treated by intramedullary nailing. We divided patients into two groups: one treated by intramedullary nailing only (control group) and the other by intramedullary nailing combined with pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMFs). The study included 57 cases of tibial pseudoarthrosis in 57 patients from February 1987 to February 2002. Pseudoarthrosis was treated surgically in all cases (Grosse-Kempf dynamic intramedullary nailing). This was combined with PEMFs in 22 cases. The average age was 38.3 years (range 14-89 years) and the average duration of follow-up was 27.2 months (range 12-48 months). Forty-nine fractures (86%) healed and eight (14%) did not. Of the group treated with PEMFs, 20 (91%) healed and two (9%) did not; from the group that did not receive PEMF (35), 29 (83%) healed compared to six (17%) that did not. The relationship between union and use of PEMFs, and between time to union and use of PEMFs was clinically relevant. PEMFs are useful when treating tibial pseudoarthrosis. Its noninvasive nature means that there are more complication-free unions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19462169      PMCID: PMC2899307          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-009-0806-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  22 in total

Review 1.  Stimulation of growth factor synthesis by electric and electromagnetic fields.

Authors:  Roy K Aaron; Barbara D Boyan; Deborah McK Ciombor; Zvi Schwartz; Bruce J Simon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Up-regulation of bone morphogenetic proteins in cultured murine bone cells with use of specific electric fields.

Authors:  Zhenyu Wang; Charles C Clark; Carl T Brighton
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Piezoelectric properties of dry and wet bone.

Authors:  J C Anderson; C Eriksson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-08-01       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Treatment of nonunion of the tibia with a capacitively coupled electrical field.

Authors:  C T Brighton; S R Pollack
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1984-02

5.  Treatment of nonunion of the tibia with constant direct current (1980 Fitts Lecture, A.A.S.T.).

Authors:  C T Brighton
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1981-03

6.  Modification of fracture repair with selected pulsing electromagnetic fields.

Authors:  C A Bassett; M G Valdes; E Hernandez
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Electrical treatment of tibial non-union: a prospective, randomised, double-blind trial.

Authors:  R B Simonis; E J Parnell; P S Ray; J L Peacock
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.586

8.  Bioelectric potentials after fracture of the tibia in rats.

Authors:  L López-Duran Stern; J Yageya
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1980-08

9.  Nonunion treatment with pulsed electromagnetic fields.

Authors:  J D Heckman; A J Ingram; R D Loyd; J V Luck; P W Mayer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1981 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Treatment of ununited tibial diaphyseal fractures with pulsing electromagnetic fields.

Authors:  C A Bassett; S N Mitchell; S R Gaston
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Coupling of pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF) therapy to molecular grounds of the cell.

Authors:  Richard Hw Funk
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 4.060

Review 2.  Electrical stimulation-based bone fracture treatment, if it works so well why do not more surgeons use it?

Authors:  Mit Balvantray Bhavsar; Zhihua Han; Thomas DeCoster; Liudmila Leppik; Karla Mychellyne Costa Oliveira; John H Barker
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2019-04-06       Impact factor: 3.693

3.  The effect of an intramedullary implant with a static magnetic field on the healing of the osteotomised rabbit femur.

Authors:  Nuri Aydin; Murat Bezer
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-01-09       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Stimulation of Bone Healing and Joint Preservation: Cellular Mechanisms of Skeletal Response.

Authors:  Ruggero Cadossi; Leo Massari; Jennifer Racine-Avila; Roy K Aaron
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2020-05

5.  Addition of shock wave therapy to nail dynamization increases the chance of long-bone non-union healing.

Authors:  Josef Stolberg-Stolberg; Thomas Fuchs; Moritz F Lodde; Steffen Roßlenbroich; Patric Garcia; Michael Raschke; Jens Everding
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2022-01-08
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.