Nicholas F McMahon1, Michael D Leveritt2, Toby G Pavey3. 1. School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD, Australia. n.mcmahon2@uq.edu.au. 2. School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD, Australia. 3. School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, QLD, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent research into the use of dietary nitrates and their role in vascular function has led to it becoming progressively more popular amongst athletes attempting to enhance performance. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this review was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature to evaluate the effect of dietary nitrate (NO3-) supplementation on endurance exercise performance. An additional aim was to determine whether the performance outcomes are affected by potential moderator variables. DATA SOURCES: Relevant databases such as Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, Ovid, Scopus and Web of Science were searched for the following search terms 'nitrates OR nitrate OR beetroot OR table beet OR garden beet OR red beet AND exercise AND performance' from inception to October 2015. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were included if a placebo versus dietary nitrate-only supplementation protocol was able to be compared, and if a quantifiable measure of exercise performance was ≥30 s (for a single bout of exercise or the combined total for multiple bouts). STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS: The literature search identified 1038 studies, with 47 (76 trials) meeting the inclusion criteria. Data from the 76 trials were extracted for inclusion in the meta-analysis. A fixed-effects meta-analysis was conducted for time trial (TT) (n = 28), time to exhaustion (TTE) (n = 22) and graded-exercise test (GXT) (n = 8) protocols. Univariate meta-regression was used to assess potential moderator variables (exercise type, dose duration, NO3- type, study quality, fitness level and percentage nitrite change). RESULTS: Pooled analysis identified a trivial but non-significant effect in favour of dietary NO3- supplementation [effect size (ES) = -0.10, 95 % Cl = -0.27 to 0.06, p > 0.05]. TTE trials had a small to moderate statistically significant effect in favour of dietary NO3- supplementation (ES = 0.33, 95 % Cl = 0.15-0.50, p < 0.01). GXT trials had a small but non-significant effect in favour of dietary NO3- supplementation in GXT performance measures (ES = 0.25, 95 % Cl = -0.06 to 0.56, p > 0.05). No significant heterogeneity was detected in the meta-analysis. No statistically significant effects were observed from the meta-regression analysis. CONCLUSION: Dietary NO3- supplementation is likely to elicit a positive outcome when testing endurance exercise capacity, whereas dietary NO3- supplementation is less likely to be effective for time-trial performance. Further work is needed to understand the optimal dosing strategies, which population is most likely to benefit, and under which conditions dietary nitrates are likely to be most effective for performance.
BACKGROUND: Recent research into the use of dietary nitrates and their role in vascular function has led to it becoming progressively more popular amongst athletes attempting to enhance performance. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this review was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature to evaluate the effect of dietary nitrate (NO3-) supplementation on endurance exercise performance. An additional aim was to determine whether the performance outcomes are affected by potential moderator variables. DATA SOURCES: Relevant databases such as Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, Ovid, Scopus and Web of Science were searched for the following search terms 'nitrates OR nitrate OR beetroot OR table beet OR garden beet OR red beet AND exercise AND performance' from inception to October 2015. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were included if a placebo versus dietary nitrate-only supplementation protocol was able to be compared, and if a quantifiable measure of exercise performance was ≥30 s (for a single bout of exercise or the combined total for multiple bouts). STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS: The literature search identified 1038 studies, with 47 (76 trials) meeting the inclusion criteria. Data from the 76 trials were extracted for inclusion in the meta-analysis. A fixed-effects meta-analysis was conducted for time trial (TT) (n = 28), time to exhaustion (TTE) (n = 22) and graded-exercise test (GXT) (n = 8) protocols. Univariate meta-regression was used to assess potential moderator variables (exercise type, dose duration, NO3- type, study quality, fitness level and percentage nitrite change). RESULTS: Pooled analysis identified a trivial but non-significant effect in favour of dietary NO3- supplementation [effect size (ES) = -0.10, 95 % Cl = -0.27 to 0.06, p > 0.05]. TTE trials had a small to moderate statistically significant effect in favour of dietary NO3- supplementation (ES = 0.33, 95 % Cl = 0.15-0.50, p < 0.01). GXT trials had a small but non-significant effect in favour of dietary NO3- supplementation in GXT performance measures (ES = 0.25, 95 % Cl = -0.06 to 0.56, p > 0.05). No significant heterogeneity was detected in the meta-analysis. No statistically significant effects were observed from the meta-regression analysis. CONCLUSION: Dietary NO3- supplementation is likely to elicit a positive outcome when testing endurance exercise capacity, whereas dietary NO3- supplementation is less likely to be effective for time-trial performance. Further work is needed to understand the optimal dosing strategies, which population is most likely to benefit, and under which conditions dietary nitrates are likely to be most effective for performance.
Authors: A P Verhagen; H C de Vet; R A de Bie; A G Kessels; M Boers; L M Bouter; P G Knipschild Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 1998-12 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Kevin G Thompson; Louise Turner; Jonathon Prichard; Fiona Dodd; David O Kennedy; Crystal Haskell; James R Blackwell; Andrew M Jones Journal: Respir Physiol Neurobiol Date: 2013-12-31 Impact factor: 1.931
Authors: Stephen J Bailey; Richard L Varnham; Fred J DiMenna; Brynmor C Breese; Lee J Wylie; Andrew M Jones Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2015-04-09
Authors: Anni Vanhatalo; Stephen J Bailey; Jamie R Blackwell; Fred J DiMenna; Toby G Pavey; Daryl P Wilkerson; Nigel Benjamin; Paul G Winyard; Andrew M Jones Journal: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol Date: 2010-08-11 Impact factor: 3.619
Authors: Scott K Ferguson; Daniel M Hirai; Steven W Copp; Clark T Holdsworth; Jason D Allen; Andrew M Jones; Timothy I Musch; David C Poole Journal: J Physiol Date: 2012-10-15 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: James Kelly; Jonathan Fulford; Anni Vanhatalo; Jamie R Blackwell; Olivia French; Stephen J Bailey; Mark Gilchrist; Paul G Winyard; Andrew M Jones Journal: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol Date: 2012-11-21 Impact factor: 3.619
Authors: Charles Affourtit; Stephen J Bailey; Andrew M Jones; Miranda J Smallwood; Paul G Winyard Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2015-07-29 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: Georgina L Kent; Brian Dawson; Gregory R Cox; Chris R Abbiss; Kurt J Smith; Kevin D Croft; Zi Xiang Lim; Annette Eastwood; Louise M Burke; Peter Peeling Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2018-01-22 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Oliver Michael Shannon; Matthew John Barlow; Lauren Duckworth; Emily Williams; Georgina Wort; David Woods; Mario Siervo; John Paul O'Hara Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2017-03-01 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Andrew R Coggan; Susan B Racette; Dakkota Thies; Linda R Peterson; Robert E Stratford Journal: Pharm Res Date: 2020-11-02 Impact factor: 4.200
Authors: Keely A Shaw; Gordon A Zello; Brian Bandy; Jongbum Ko; Leandy Bertrand; Philip D Chilibeck Journal: Nutrients Date: 2021-06-11 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Rosa M Keller; Laura M Beaver; Patrick N Reardon; Mary C Prater; Lisa Truong; Matthew M Robinson; Robyn L Tanguay; Jan F Stevens; Norman G Hord Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2021-05-27