Literature DB >> 27599150

Assessment of the Sampling Performance of Multiple-Copy Dynamics versus a Unique Trajectory.

Juan J Perez1, M Santos Tomas2, Jaime Rubio-Martinez3.   

Abstract

The goal of the present study was to ascertain the differential performance of a long molecular dynamics trajectory versus several shorter ones starting from different points in the phase space and covering the same sampling time. For this purpose, we selected the 16-mer peptide Bak16BH3 as a model for study and carried out several samplings in explicit solvent. These samplings included an 8 μs trajectory (sampling S1); two 4 μs trajectories (sampling S2); four 2 μs trajectories (sampling S3); eight 1 μs trajectories (sampling S4); 16 0.5 μs trajectories (sampling S5), and 80 0.1 μs trajectories (sampling S6). Moreover, the 8 μs trajectory was further extended to 16 μs to have reference values of the diverse properties measured. The diverse samplings were compared qualitatively and quantitatively. Among the former, we carried out a comparison of the conformational profiles of the peptide using cluster analysis. Moreover, we also gained insight into the interchange among these structures along the sampling process. Among the latter, we computed the number of new conformational patterns sampled with time using strings defined from the conformations attained by each of the residues in the peptide. We also compared the locations and depths of the obtained minima on the free energy surface using principal component analysis. Finally, we also compared the helical profiles per residue at the end of the sampling process. The results suggest that a few short molecular dynamics trajectories may provide better sampling than one unique trajectory. Moreover, this procedure can also be advantageous to avoid getting trapped in a local minimum. However, caution should be exercised since short trajectories need to be long enough to overcome local barriers surrounding the starting point and the required sampling time depends on the number of degrees of freedom of the system under study. An effective way to gain insight into the minimum MD trajectory length is to monitor the convergence of different structural features, as shown in the present work.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27599150     DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00347

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  5 in total

1.  Oxidation State Dependent Conformational Changes of HMGB1 Regulate the Formation of the CXCL12/HMGB1 Heterocomplex.

Authors:  Enrico M A Fassi; Jacopo Sgrignani; Gianluca D'Agostino; Valentina Cecchinato; Maura Garofalo; Giovanni Grazioso; Mariagrazia Uguccioni; Andrea Cavalli
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 7.271

2.  Molecular-dynamics-simulation-guided membrane engineering allows the increase of membrane fatty acid chain length in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Jeroen M Maertens; Simone Scrima; Matteo Lambrughi; Samuel Genheden; Cecilia Trivellin; Leif A Eriksson; Elena Papaleo; Lisbeth Olsson; Maurizio Bettiga
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  EZH2-induced lysine K362 methylation enhances TMPRSS2-ERG oncogenic activity in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Marita Zoma; Laura Curti; Dheeraj Shinde; Domenico Albino; Abhishek Mitra; Jacopo Sgrignani; Sarah N Mapelli; Giada Sandrini; Gianluca Civenni; Jessica Merulla; Giovanna Chiorino; Paolo Kunderfranco; Alessia Cacciatore; Aleksandra Kokanovic; Andrea Rinaldi; Andrea Cavalli; Carlo V Catapano; Giuseppina M Carbone
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Modeling and subtleties of K-Ras and Calmodulin interaction.

Authors:  Eduardo Garrido; Juan Lázaro; Montserrat Jaumot; Neus Agell; Jaime Rubio-Martinez
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 5.  Computational Modeling as a Tool to Investigate PPI: From Drug Design to Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Juan J Perez; Roman A Perez; Alberto Perez
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2021-05-20
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.